Originally posted by Genesis-Soldier
so should we all agree to put him on our ignore list and see in if works?i respectfully disagree to idea of goku losing to kent
Yes. It would be a nice experiment. I have him on ignore since some months now and never regrettet it, suddenly most threads were enjoyable 😉.
You are not alone, and since this is just us fans, it can go either way. ^^ Noting wrong with disagreeing.
Originally posted by Genesis-SoldierIt looks better off than Jango Fett's armor since Kenobi was hurting in it but later hurt himself kicking Grievous.
and how e3ffective is there body armor? what are the standard damage/ wear and tear it can deal with?power and frequency are 2 diffrent things
I never said they were the same. Power wise Khan's gun is hands down more powerful than anything Connor has tanked.
Originally posted by quanchi112
It looks better off than Jango Fett's armor since Kenobi was hurting in it but later hurt himself kicking Grievous.I never said they were the same. Power wise Khan's gun is hands down more powerful than anything Connor has tanked.
but does it have the frequency to destroy the nanites
solid projectiles couldnt destroy the nanites on any levels
Originally posted by Genesis-SoldierSo you admit raw power plays a factor thus undermining your earlier point completely.
the death star has a high frequency ionised fieldthat would kill him Duh
that and the fact that its a Planet level destroying weapon just makes things funnier
Khan wins with contemptuous ease.
Originally posted by Genesis-SoldierYou already admitted raw power plays a factor thus undermining your own point. You are defeated as is Connor here against Khan.
does khan have access to this raw power on a planetary level... NO!?
Connor still wins and you have now defined the round capacity nor origin of the boolean gun shots so quite dodging
Originally posted by Genesis-SoldierYou need to prove the resistance then based off what Connor has resisted. Your claim so back it up, boy.
correction you pleb i said the power and frequency are the keys to destroying the nanitesthe boolean gun doesnt have the power nor the frequency to distrupe of destroy the nanites
and since you havent tried to prove when composes a boolean shot you can go cry somewhere else
your the one who claimed a boolean gun could hurt John's nanites
i quoted the movie saying and explaining you need a frequency of a distruptive nature in terms of electronic equipment and that the power must be substantial enough to absolutely destroy the matter of the nanites
you have not proven a boolean gun is capable of this
connors resistance has been shown to improve over dealt damage
at first a standard shotgun took him down for about 14 seconds in the hospital parking lot, he later got up and started the fight
we later see the same shotgun becoming less and less effective as the visible damage starts to lessen, the example of this is john managing to walk foward during the piont blank shots instead of being previously blown off his feet
this is also shown in the emp shotgun shells, they are very effective the first time they are used but eventually their effect became weaker over time and a EMP lancer was used against john
the quote by pops in the bunker armoury "these weapons will cause minimal damage to connor.../" also corroborates the fact theat the shotgun and even 50 cal weaponry would be useless against john
Originally posted by Genesis-SoldierDue to your claims it's simple. Prove he can resist the Boolean gun or admit you made a baseless claim out of personal bias. None of the weaponry used against Connor in the film is similar to the Boolean gun.
your the one who claimed a boolean gun could hurt John's nanitesi quoted the movie saying and explaining you need a frequency of a distruptive nature in terms of electronic equipment and that the power must be substantial enough to absolutely destroy the matter of the nanites
you have not proven a boolean gun is capable of this
connors resistance has been shown to improve over dealt damage
at first a standard shotgun took him down for about 14 seconds in the hospital parking lot, he later got up and started the fight
we later see the same shotgun becoming less and less effective as the visible damage starts to lessen, the example of this is john managing to walk foward during the piont blank shots instead of being previously blown off his feetthis is also shown in the emp shotgun shells, they are very effective the first time they are used but eventually their effect became weaker over time and a EMP lancer was used against john
the quote by pops in the bunker armoury "these weapons will cause minimal damage to connor.../" also corroborates the fact theat the shotgun and even 50 cal weaponry would be useless against john
according to my search the boolean gun has an energy field based on the Klingon Haevy Disruptor but is more focused then the "kill setting" allowing to go through hulls and soldiers
the boolean gun is a direct energy weapon ( http://en.memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Boolean_gun) but has no claim of frequency, just direct energy that can apparently "vapourise" but that a very emotive and bias word so to vaporise is to be questioned
direct energy weapons (in reality) use heavy energy ions
not electro magnetic fields
I.E. connor can resist and possibly adapt in durability and resistance to the boolean gun
Originally posted by Genesis-SoldierSo you ignore your own evidence and show clear bias. Khan wins.
according to my search the boolean gun has an energy field based on the Klingon Haevy Disruptor but is more focused then the "kill setting" allowing to go through hulls and soldiersthe boolean gun is a direct energy weapon ( http://en.memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Boolean_gun) but has no claim of frequency, just direct energy that can apparently "vapourise" but that a very emotive and bias word so to vaporise is to be questioned
direct energy weapons (in reality) use heavy energy ions
not electro magnetic fieldsI.E. connor can resist and possibly adapt in durability and resistance to the boolean gun