Goku vs Superman Death Battle-Discuss

Originally posted by juggerman
1. There is a translation error
2. We see with our own eyes the South galaxy is not one shotted
3. If he did one shot it (he didn't) why were slaves alive and their planet intact? Or New Vegeta? Or that comet?

He laid ruins to one which is pretty got darn close. Example. A planet exploding and pieces being left over doesn't mean the planet wasn't destroyed. We see the Galaxy being annihilated. Some parts were left over but what we do know is, he ruined a Galaxy.

Think about it like this...

Here we see Surfer destroying a small planet...

But there were chunks of it still left...

http://smg.photobucket.com/user/mrfuc/media-full//annihilationsilversurfekt9.jpg.html

Would you still consider this planet busting?

Originally posted by carver9
He laid ruins to one which is pretty got darn close. Example. A planet exploding and pieces being left over doesn't mean the planet wasn't destroyed. We see the Galaxy being annihilated. Some parts were left over but what we do know is, he ruined a Galaxy.

Think about it like this...

Here we see Surfer destroying a small planet...

But there were chunks of it still left...

http://smg.photobucket.com/user/mrfuc/media-full//annihilationsilversurfekt9.jpg.html

Would you still consider this planet busting?

Originally posted by BeyonderGod
Didn't one shot a galaxy regardless of your scans.
He went planet to planet overtime

Prove that he went planet to planet. We see a Galaxy disappear. Nothing was hinted at him moving around when doing this. It vanishes right then. Convince me that he flew around destroying parts of a Galaxy. Scans or video clips please. No one takes you serious concerning dragonball bro.

Here is the scene if you need it.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=W7jEiiT5RDo

Originally posted by juggerman
1. There is a translation error
2. We see with our own eyes the South galaxy is not one shotted
3. If he did one shot it (he didn't) why were slaves alive and their planet intact? Or New Vegeta? Or that comet?

It was explained a dozen times. They are just tards. Give up, it's pointless, the blind fanboys see what they wish to see. Neither reason nor truth will make them see.

Originally posted by carver9
Prove that he went planet to planet. We see a Galaxy disappear. Nothing was hinted at him moving around when doing this. It vanishes right then. Convince me that he flew around destroying parts of a Galaxy. Scans or video clips please. No one takes you serious concerning dragonball bro.

If you actually notice the planets started to disappear OVERTIME in your own video so please stop you need to consider actually watch before typing. Because you debunked your own statement just by posting that video.

1 shoting a galaxy would be what beyonder did in secret wars Broly did nothing like that.

Originally posted by Prof. T.C McAbe
It was explained a dozen times. They are just tards. Give up, it's pointless, the blind fanboys see what they wish to see. Neither reason nor truth will make them see.

Originally posted by carver9
He laid ruins to one which is pretty got darn close. Example. A planet exploding and pieces being left over doesn't mean the planet wasn't destroyed. We see the Galaxy being annihilated. Some parts were left over but what we do know is, he ruined a Galaxy.

Think about it like this...

Here we see Surfer destroying a small planet...

But there were chunks of it still left...

http://smg.photobucket.com/user/mrfuc/media-full//annihilationsilversurfekt9.jpg.html

Would you still consider this planet busting?

I'm glad you agree Broly didn't one shot a galaxy.

Now as I said earlier, there is a translation error. In the original version Broly was stated to be terrorizing the galaxy or something like that. Far from him having destroyed it. Besides Broly is non canon. He could have farted and destroyed the multiverse and it would have zero reflection on the canon characters.

Broly is somewhere near the Cell tier. Some argue higher and some argue lower but it's clear he is around that level. Cell is *only* a solar system buster. To argue Broly is wayyyyy beyond that in a lower powered form is asinine man.

Originally posted by BeyonderGod
K dont care about others because they can't prove anything other than dbz wanking.....

If you actually notice the planets started to disappear OVERTIME in your own video so please stop you need to consider actually watch before typing. Because you debunked your own statement just by posting that video.

1 shoting a galaxy would be what beyonder did in secret wars Broly did nothing like that.

Lol...the Galaxy disappear within a second. Him destroying it within the amount of time we seen it disappear would mean Broly is trillions of times faster than light. What we saw is the Galaxy disappear. That's all that needs to be said. You said he destroyed it planet by planet (even though there are more than just planets in a Gakaxy), so prove it.

Originally posted by juggerman
I'm glad you agree Broly didn't one shot a galaxy.

Now as I said earlier, there is a translation error. In the original version Broly was stated to be terrorizing the galaxy or something like that. Far from him having destroyed it. Besides Broly is non canon. He could have farted and destroyed the multiverse and it would have zero reflection on the canon characters.

Broly is somewhere near the Cell tier. Some argue higher and some argue lower but it's clear he is around that level. Cell is *only* a solar system buster. To argue Broly is wayyyyy beyond that in a lower powered form is asinine man.

Never said he one shot it or it was canon. I did say he annihilated one though, and he did. I would put him above Cell though. People only put him on Cell level due to his performance against Gohan but people fail to realize is, Broly was weakened during the second movie.

Originally posted by Prof. T.C McAbe
It was explained a dozen times. They are just tards. Give up, it's pointless, the blind fanboys see what they wish to see. Neither reason nor truth will make them see.

Dude. No one with DBZ credibility is replying or commenting on your posts. It's being skipped over. Just stop.

Originally posted by carver9
Never said he one shot it or it was canon. I did say he annihilated one though, and he did. I would put him above Cell though.

But we don't know how long it took

Originally posted by carver9
Broly was weakened during the second movie.

No he wasn't

YouTube video

Here is a nice explanation.

And damn Goku is an idiot, seriously now wonder he attracts the majority of the tards...

At least the show has cool guys like Piccolo, Tien and Roshi.

Originally posted by juggerman
But we don't know how long it took

No he wasn't

How long the video showed us it took. Why are you making things complicated? Lol.

Yes he was. The injury Goku gave him was still in effect.

Originally posted by carver9
How long the video showed us it took. Why are you making things complicated? Lol.

Yes he was. The injury Goku gave him was still in effect.

Give me one feat that we actually see the shows Broly can do something on that scale that fast and I'll concede. Either an insane speed feat or a power output feat that shows he can either galaxy bust or move around and bust chunks like that. Just one. Without it we use common sense

Where was that shown or stated?

Originally posted by juggerman
Give me one feat that we actually see the shows Broly can do something on that scale that fast and I'll concede. Either an insane speed feat or a power output feat that shows he can either galaxy bust or move around and bust chunks like that. Just one. Without it we use common sense

Where was that shown or stated?

Why would I name another ft when we have the one Broly did already? I wasn't expecting him to bust two Galaxies in one movie. You're adding time to something that was already shown. Why say something lasted for yrs or months when we see a Galaxy disappearing within the blink of an eye. Really?

Wasn't it mentioned that he was weakened in the movie (Broly)?

Originally posted by carver9
Why would I name another ft when we have the one Broly did already? I wasn't expecting him to bust two Galaxies in one movie. You're adding time to something that was already shown. Why say something lasted for yrs or months when we see a Galaxy disappearing within the blink of an eye. Really?

Wasn't it mentioned that he was weakened in the movie (Broly)?

We don't see him doing anything. We see lights and planets disappearing. So again unless you have a feat that we can SEE him doing something in, we can't just assume it happened in that time frame when literally EVERYTHING else tells us otherwise

Not that I recall. If anything, he was stronger

Originally posted by juggerman
We don't see him doing anything. We see lights and planets disappearing. So again unless you have a feat that we can SEE him doing something in, we can't just assume it happened in that time frame when literally EVERYTHING else tells us otherwise

Not that I recall. If anything, he was stronger

How else would he have done what he did unless it was done with a kai blast? The Galaxy was destroyed within a second. We do not need to add anything to this. Why would I provide evidence to something that was already supported?

I think it was. I will rewatch it just to be on the safe side.

Originally posted by carver9
How else would he have done what he did unless it was done with a kai blast? The Galaxy was destroyed within a second. We do not need to add anything to this. Why would I provide evidence to something that was already supported?

I think it was. I will rewatch it just to be on the safe side.

We do when the original text is different and implies action over time rather than something that happened in an instant. That's why we say it didn't happen as quickly as you want it to

Let me know what you find

Originally posted by juggerman
I never said it was an attack. You basically tried to use your higher post count to prove a point like posting more makes you better or more knowledgeable for some reason. All I did was point out that it makes no sense.

Only one jumping to conclusions here is you bud

No, I didn't. 😂 That's the jumping to conclusions that I'm talking about. I said it because for someone who didn't feel like he was "new" and was so offended by it, he didn't have many posts to prove otherwise. Turns out, he's actually posted quite a bit. So he was right. Pointing out my own was to show the contrast of activity despite his registration date. Not to prove that I'm knowledgeable or better, as you jumped to on your own, and I didn't imply.

It's okay to be wrong, but hiding from it or trying to go around it like you are, is embarrassing. So stop.