Goku vs Superman Death Battle-Discuss

You mad already? New record.

Who's mad?

Am just asking why you posted such a useless scan?

"Such a useless scan". Oh yes, you mad.

Because it is a useless scan, what happened when DD and Kal clashed at the end of the story?

You love using low showings to try and make Superman look bad for some reason.

😂

Cry more. That's the only thing you're good for these days.

Originally posted by SquallX
Because it is a useless scan, what happened when DD and Kal clashed at the end of the story?

You love using low showings to try and make Superman look bad for some reason.

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
😂

Cry more. That's the only thing you're good for these days.

Dude, you're ****ing pathetic.

Originally posted by bbrem123
Just like some are using the ring showing against Goku? Even when it is backed by specific context.

Am not one of those people.

All characters have low showing, comic books more than most because of there multiple writers, but to just use there low showings to prove a point is stupid.

True you are not one to lowball. I was referring to the others posting above.

Originally posted by Squallossus Big C
Dude, you're ****ing pathetic.

Look who's talking 😂

haermm2

I did see your argument on Goku getting hit by that laser. Which you think is a low showing.

In reality it is not. It is just how the DBZverse works. Low to no ki means very vulnerable. Pretty straight forward.

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW

haermm2

So you're using Aquaman has a low showing? Do you even know how powerful Arthur can be if written right?

Pre 52, in one battle, Arthur almost kill off the human population with his tp.

Originally posted by bbrem123
I did see your argument on Goku getting hit by that laser. Which you think is a low showing.

In reality it is not. It is just how the DBZverse works. Low to no ki means very vulnerable. Pretty straight forward.

My point exactly, using low showing is a bad way to debate. If low showings is all were using against one character, yet using the other character highest showing, then what's the point of even debating then.

Superman has 70 yrs of feats under his belt, but the fact that all I see here are his low showings, that shows something doesn't it?

This is hilarious.

Originally posted by SquallX
My point exactly, using low showing is a bad way to debate. If low showings is all were using against one character, yet using the other character highest showing, then what's the point of even debating then.

Superman has 70 yrs of feats under his belt, but the fact that all I see here are his low showings, that shows something doesn't it?

They think Goku wins. Why are they obligated to find Superman's best feats? What they're doing is no different than picking out the high end feats while ignoring the low showings. I don't think any of them really believe on average that Supes can be knocked out by a branding iron.

Originally posted by AuraAngel
They think Goku wins. Why are they obligated to find Superman's best feats? What they're doing is no different than picking out the high end feats while ignoring the low showings. I don't think any of them really believe on average that Supes can be knocked out by a branding iron.

👆

Originally posted by SquallX
So you're using Aquaman has a low showing? Do you even know how powerful Arthur can be if written right?

Pre 52, in one battle, Arthur almost kill off the human population with his tp.

His tp has nothing to do with what happened.

You're a typical Superman zombie fanboy. Hating on Bats, trolling the forum, never wanting to admit when Supes is outclassed.

😖hifty:

Originally posted by carver9
This is hilarious.

No you are.