The case of Sandra Bland

Started by riv66723 pages

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
she was arrested for resisting arrest. if you support that then you piss on the bill of rights and support a police-state. /fact

Haha, no.

Originally posted by riv6672
Haha, no.

I agree with riv, some of the people that support it are just racist. But those are the only two options.

Haha, no.

But I said I agree with you, so you are directly disagreeing with yourself, make up your mind, man!

Haha, okay.

Originally posted by riv6672
Haha, no.

Originally posted by riv6672
Haha, no.

Originally posted by riv6672
Haha, okay.

that's nice dear.

You can call me what you want, i 'll call what you are: wrong.

not interested in your substance-free antagonistic posturing spam. *ignored*

Thats nice dear.

Of coarse this guy never gets wanted for shit posting.

So she apparently said she was suicidal while being processed and the police let her get into her cell with a plastic bag large/strong enough to support a grown woman's weight, when they typically take away your belt and shoelaces to prevent suicides?

Yeah, sounds reasonable.

Originally posted by Robtard
So she apparently said she was suicidal while being processed and the police let her get into her cell with a plastic bag large/strong enough to support a grown woman's weight, when they typically take away your belt and shoelaces to prevent suicides?

Did they?

Originally posted by riv6672
Did they?

Yes and clearly. The death of ethnic minorities in western countries, particularly Blacks shouldn't shock us anymore intellectually....... and perhaps it doesn't but as fellow humans they still make anyone right thinking disgusted on all levels.

Originally posted by Knife
Yes and clearly. The death of ethnic minorities in western countries, particularly Blacks shouldn't shock us anymore intellectually....... and perhaps it doesn't but as fellow humans they still make anyone right thinking disgusted on all levels.

Its no use to respond to him, you made his troll "ignore list" on his profile.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Its no use to respond to him, you made his troll "ignore list" on his profile.

I've hardly spoken to the guy, that's a weird thing to have. I see you're on it too. Weird behaviour. Anyway, thanks for the heads up, I won't reply to him anymore.

Originally posted by Knife
I've hardly spoken to the guy, that's a weird thing to have. I see you're on it too. Weird behaviour. Anyway, thanks for the heads up, I won't reply to him anymore.

I said Sentry/gladiator was a Superman Rip off, and he went ballistic, I called him out, and he put me on there. Ironic coming from him who has a bunch of Superman fanboy stuff in his profile.

Here so you can see.
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f48/t604450.html

You can't reason with a troll.

A little story from social media:

A mural of Sandra Bland was put up

Within 24 hours it was defaced by writing 'All Lives Matter' on top of it (note, it originally had no text, so... yeeea), and within a few hours it was fixed again.

Thats both sad and or funny (depending on where you fall on the topic) for many reasons.

Originally posted by Q99
A little story from social media:

A mural of Sandra Bland was put up

Within 24 hours it was defaced by writing 'All Lives Matter' on top of it (note, it originally had no text, so... yeeea), and within a few hours it was fixed again.

Oh well, all lives do matter, now what?

Originally posted by tru-marvell
1) The cop initiated the stop by quickly driving up behind her...as she clearly states on video...she moved over to allow him to pass as anyone would do...she didn't signal because NO ONE signals before moving out of the way of a speeding police car-you just get out of the way

2) The cop has NO business asking her to put out her cigarette...it's funny how some say that we are turning into a police state but then say that "they" need to do whatever the cop tells "them" to do.

3) He places her under arrest for "resisting arrest"... that makes absolutely no since. Especially considering the initial report was that she "assaulted" the cop which is a blatant LIE. It's clear that he enjoys his "power" and looses control when that authority is challenged.

4)Why would he take her out of camera range?

Did she kill herself? It's impossible for me to speculate...but it is very clear that the cop was wrong from the very beginning-from the bogus initial stop to escalating rather than deescalating the situation.

And I dare anyone to state that he/she would be all smiles and giggles if/when a cop improperly confronts you. I am one of the most carefree-laid back people you would ever meet and I will tell you from personal experience that you will loose your cool when a cop tries to step on you.

And the bullshit about her having had been in trouble with the law before is just a smoke screen. Most of the adults today would be locked away if we are using that bullshit argument, so please just stop with that.

This is all well and good, but what was being said was that the things that people are told to do in order to avoid getting messed over by cops do not work for black people. I pointed out in this case she did NOT behave in a way that is suggested.

Also doesn't a cop have to take a person out of the range of the dash cam in order to actually put them in the car? Am I just not getting how a dash cam works? Can it see front and back?