Originally posted by Digi
I'd make OV a dirty smear. Er, wait. I'd ruin his campaign with my dirty smear? My long dirty policy positions would siphon your smear?I'm a bit confused. But either way, it ends with OV needing counseling.
Your shitty policies would become his shitty policies by way of theft, by which he would effectively lead himself to ruin.
Originally posted by Sacred Fire
DDM, just know, whenever you run, I'm voting for you (probably)! 👆
You had better. Because I'm going to win and don't you want the satisfaction of knowing you voted for a winner? estahuh
Originally posted by Omega Vision
I'll run against DDD and ruin him with a dirty smear campaign.
TL - DR
You'd try to run a smear campaign but then fail horribly as I provide evidence that shows you just a smearer. It's nice having a Federal Security Clearance: it's like a ready-made-resume for why I'm clean as a whistle. peaches I could go into details but, basically, I could even go as far as to provide my internet browsing history and still not fear negative backlash. I'm clean as a whistle in my private life.
Originally posted by psmith81992
Dadumon, why are you against the death penalty?
Did you read my words? You came to the opposite conclusion of what I stated.
I'll quote it for you, again:
Originally posted by dadudemon
2. Support the death penalty. (Sep 2004) - Disagree. Death penalty should only be used in cases where a criminal refuses rehabilitation and is 100% guilty (overwhelming evidence that they are guilty). Cold-blooded gang-bangers and mass murders are some of the types that would fit this case IF caught with absurdly convincing evidence.
2. Support the death penalty. (Sep 2004) - Disagree. Death penalty should only be used in cases where a criminal refuses rehabilitation and is 100% guilty (overwhelming evidence that they are guilty). Cold-blooded gang-bangers and mass murders are some of the types that would fit this case IF caught with absurdly convincing evidence.
Originally posted by psmith81992
I skimmed through it, but I get it now. My problem is with offering a criminal rehabilitation. I'm not interested in rehabilitating murders, much less those who commit first degree/capital murder.
Then you're a barbarian who can find company among people from the Middle Ages that burned widows for being witches. 👆
Originally posted by dadudemon
Then you're a barbarian who can find company among people from the Middle Ages that burned widows for being witches. 👆
Originally posted by psmith81992
I skimmed through it, but I get it now. My problem is with offering a criminal rehabilitation. I'm not interested in rehabilitating murders, much less those who commit first degree/capital murder.
Originally posted by Omega Visioni think those that commit first degree/capital murder should not be redeemed. And i don't understand why you're glad i don't write the laws when i simply agree with current death penalty.statutes. Furthermore, what kind of naive, asinine nonsense is "those who don't seek rehab", dadumon? What does that even mean? Explain that before you look like an emotional fool calling someone else a barbarian. That just makes me laugh.
👆Do you assume that all murderers are going to be depraved and irredeemable, such that you're not even willing to work on those who could be reformed? I'm glad you're not writing our criminal laws.
NBC Survey Monkey polls:
Trump on both!
Fiorina demonstrates it's better to be the winner of the second tier poll, than just ok in the first.
It'll be interesting to see how the polling from the big pollsters shows. What with Fiornia being pushed as the 'winner' of the second tier ones a lot, I bet she'll get bumped up.
Originally posted by Omega VisionWhen you cease advocating ignorant and naive statements, as well as looking foolish giving thumbs up to a statement that somehow compares me to witch burning(one of dumbest things ever saif here), I'll use different words, preferably ones you can understand.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/Please learn new words.
Originally posted by psmith81992
i think those that commit first degree/capital murder should not be redeemed. And i don't understand why you're glad i don't write the laws when i simply agree with current death penalty.statutes. Furthermore, what kind of naive, asinine nonsense is "those who don't seek rehab", dadumon? What does that even mean? Explain that before you look like an emotional fool calling someone else a barbarian. That just makes me laugh.
👆
Originally posted by dadudemon
Then you're a barbarian who can find company among people from the Middle Ages that burned widows for being witches. 👆
"Barbarian", my ass. I guess you don't have the slightest phucking clue what the words "fitting justice" means huh? Doesn't surprise me one bit. Giving a cold-blooded murderer 3 square meals a day, cable tv, a cozy cell, and let them live out their lives and die in a non-violent manner is not justice.