Find this story to be hilarious; why I'm not surprised in the least that Trump would be his own PR man under an alias, it's just something that screams Trump, why he's lying and denying it now decades later is weird.
http://gawker.com/who-leaked-the-tape-of-donald-trump-impersonating-a-pub-1776879557
TI shows up and talks about Hilary. So Rob shows his face and has to talk about Trump.
Pretty stupid on your part Rob. It's literally like you just look for me to post about Hilary so you can post "look what trump did."
So how does this unsubstantiated story compare with "bill is going to take care of the economy."
I don't think you can even wrap your head around the idea that she can't do the job herself and this is her way of Bill getting a third unelected term.
Originally posted by Robtard
Find this story to be hilarious; why I'm not surprised in the least that Trump would be his own PR man under an alias, it's just something that screams Trump, why he's lying and denying it now decades later is weird.http://gawker.com/who-leaked-the-tape-of-donald-trump-impersonating-a-pub-1776879557
Yeah but then one of the articles says Trump is the one who released this information. Which just seems odd.
Presidential candidates always speak about who they take as advisors. That's the way it should be. Disclosing that she would take economic advice from Bill Clinton is important, and gives the voters the agency to decide whether they approve of that choice or not and plan their voting decision accordingly.
Originally posted by Surtur
Yeah but then one of the articles says Trump is the one who released this information. Which just seems odd.
Hence the story being a big pile of shit.
So funny Rob wants to try and distract from Hilary saying "Bill will be in charge of the economy."
Means she is not up to the job, at all.
Originally posted by Bardock42
Presidential candidates always speak about who they take as advisors. That's the way it should be. Disclosing that she would take economic advice from Bill Clinton is important, and gives the voters the agency to decide whether they approve of that choice or not and plan their voting decision accordingly.
The first gentleman should never be in charge of the economy.
"Bill what should I do!?"
"Oh honey I'll take care of it, you just sign it into law, cause I'm not an elected official."
I like how all the ultra liberals are trying to spin this into a good thing.
I wonder what would happen if Trump said "My son is going to be in charge of the economy."
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
TI shows up and talks about Hilary. So Rob shows his face and has to talk about Trump.Pretty stupid on your part Rob. It's literally like you just look for me to post about Hilary so you can post "look what trump did."
So how does this unsubstantiated story compare with "bill is going to take care of the economy."
I don't think you can even wrap your head around the idea that she can't do the job herself and this is her way of Bill getting a third unelected term.
Sorry, is this not the election thread and is Trump not the presumptive nominee on the Right?
Well, that's people like you stretching what she said/meant to fit their agenda, which is to bash Clinton.
The Reality: For the first time ever a sitting POTUS would have the benefit of having a former POTUS as a potential advisor; it would be stupid not to tap into Bill's eight years of knowledge. Nay, it would be negligent not to.
This is part of the reason why I don't get the Hilary is evil meme.
Originally posted by Bardock42
That's a very negative reading of what was said. However I don't think you were a potential Clinton voter anyways, so no big loss for them. At any rate, Hillary Clinton had real influence on policy when she was the first lady, and Bill Clinton will obviously as well.
So good job Rob, ignoring and dodging Clinton not being up to the task on fixing the economy.
You haven't been here in 5 days and as soon as I post something about Hilary, you do the liberal "oh look at this unsubstantiated hit piece."
Fact is she's not up to the job herself and Bill will be president.
Her whole "women are equal" argument is null and void.
I neither ignored nor dodged, I directly responded to your question about Clinton.
Again, is this not the election thread? Complaining that I posted a story about Trump when you post repeatedly about Clinton is silly of you.
Trump's story 'hit piece' or not is true, we have Trump on tape pretending to be someone else and acting as his own PR man. It's effing hilarious.