General Primary Discussion Thread

Originally posted by MS Warehouse
Why don't you guys just admit that Trump's bankruptcies were just that. He had a few of them out of thousands of deals and he's responsible for those few. Case closed.

He can't admit he's a hypocrite.

Hence, it's bad for Trump to make money off something but ok for Hilary to acquire wealth through taking money from our enemies.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
It's ok though, as long as the govenment does it like the tax payer funded bailouts. If Trump does it, well it's evil and wrong. Hence why he hates capitalism.

http://nypost.com/2015/11/20/a-new-taxpayer-bailout-to-cover-up-obamacares-failure/

He looked the other way here.

You clearly went to wiki and used wiki's source politifact.com to hide the fact you went to Wikipedia.

Originally posted by Robtard
Politifact.com is now Wikipedia?

If I didn't point this out, you would be quoting wikis sources still instead of just using Wikipedia.

You're still using quotes as arguments instead of making your own arguments tho.

Originally posted by Robtard
The Trump Taj Mahal is ultimately owned by Icahn Enterprises.

Bankruptcy is being used to portray Trump as incompetent by shitty news websites Rob finds in Wikipedia articles under citation.

The reality is he negotiated his shares and came back stronger. Trump has never personally gone bankrupt and makes very good business decisions. Much better than Hilary's First Lady.

Originally posted by MS Warehouse
Why don't you guys just admit that Trump's bankruptcies were just that. He had a few of them out of thousands of deals and he's responsible for those few. Case closed.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
He can't admit he's a hypocrite.

Hence, it's bad for Trump to make money off something but ok for Hilary to acquire wealth through taking money from our enemies.

Did you not see that MS was talking to you and XYZ?

Can't discuss Clinton. Trump got bankrupt 4 times.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
He looked the other way here.

lol. TI and XYZ, Trump has 3-4 bankruptcies to his name. This is a fact. That does in no way negate the fact that he's an amazing businessman. I don't know why the two are mutually exclusive.

Originally posted by It's xyz!
You clearly went to wiki and used wiki's source politifact.com to hide the fact you went to Wikipedia.

If I didn't point this out, you would be quoting wikis sources still instead of just using Wikipedia.

You're still using quotes as arguments instead of making your own arguments tho.

Trump ultimately got his shares back and made money from a renegotiation he made with his company.

The story I posted was form Politifact, you dismissed it and used Wiki as a supposedly better source (page 172), not realizing even Wiki didn't support your claims which I was happy to point out. Next time actually ready what you're linking to. It will help you not look like a complete fool.

Once again you made a claim that wasn't true and now you're trying to spin it into something else. Trump Entertainment & Resorts own/manages the Trump Taj Mahal, but even that company was purchased by Icahn Enterprises due to a Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

Originally posted by MS Warehouse
lol. TI and XYZ, Trump has 3-4 bankruptcies to his name. This is a fact. That does in no way negate the fact that he's an amazing businessman. I don't know why the two are mutually exclusive.

Do you let Wikipedia citations form your opinion for you too?

I refuse to believe a negotiation of shares is classed as bankrupt.

Originally posted by It's xyz!
MS, please tell me you're not believing these were actual bankruptcies?

Do you let Wikipedia citations form your opinion for you too?

I refuse to believe a negotiation of shares is classed as bankrupt.

Originally posted by It's xyz!
weve read your biased article. Wikipedia goes into more depth.

Originally posted by MS Warehouse
lol. TI and XYZ, Trump has 3-4 bankruptcies to his name. This is a fact. That does in no way negate the fact that he's an amazing businessman. I don't know why the two are mutually exclusive.

You're attempting reason and logic, I suspect you'll fail too.

Originally posted by It's xyz!
MS, please tell me you're not believing these were actual bankruptcies?

Do you let Wikipedia citations form your opinion for you too?

I refuse to believe a negotiation of shares is classed as bankrupt.

Rob does not understand business, he is a employee not a business owner.

MS, please tell me you're not believing these were actual bankruptcies?

Rob does not understand business, he is a employee not a business owner.

Originally posted by Robtard
The story I posted was form Politifact, you dismissed it and used Wiki as a supposedly better source, not realizing even Wiki didn't support your claims which I was happy to point out. Next time actually ready what you're linking to. It will help you not look like a complete fool.

Once again you made a claim that wasn't true and now you're trying to spin it into something else. Trump Entertainment & Resorts own/manages the Trump Taj Mahal, but even that company was purchased by Icahn Enterprises due to a Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

I never said wiki was a better source. I figured, when in Rome, let's not bother using the citations. You managed to find sources quicker, btw.

Now you're repeating my insults back at me. Trump has never personally gone bankrupt. He's merely renegotiated shares. Politifact looks like pop political garbage that goes into no detail and is probably owned by Trump hating Jews anyway.

You made the claim that Trump went bankrupt 4 times because of a Wikipedia citation. I argued the semantics of the word bankrupt and it was clearly a renegotiation. Bankrupt means bankrupt.

Icahn own it due to a 2014 renegotiation (I mean bankruptcy), not because Trump lost it in 1991.

****ing hell, Trump got it back in 1998 in the Wikipedia article you failed to read!

When you declare for either Chapter 7, 11, or 13, you are declaring bankruptcy (for different purposes of course). There's no way to spin that.

Originally posted by MS Warehouse
Don't play this game with me. I know more about Trump and his business dealings than you could possibly hope to learn. He has declared bankruptcy at least 3 times from my memory, which I don't really have too much of a problem with.

Rob said so.

Originally posted by It's xyz!
It was 4.

Rob said so.

Originally posted by MS Warehouse
Don't play this game with me. I know more about Trump and his business dealings than you could possibly hope to learn. He has declared bankruptcy at least 3 times from my memory, which I don't really have too much of a problem with. It's a blip on a portfolio that's impressive in any sense of the word. My question is why you're trying to rationalize that the bankruptcies were anything but? Nobody is shitting on Trump for having said bankruptcies and nobody is discussing Hilary, who isn't even in the same stratosphere as Trump as far as business acumen is concerned.

I have no idea how one has to do with the other, and I doubt you're a business owner too. I however, am a business owner and I understand business very well, so all of this rationalizing is completely pointless. Trump had a few bankruptcies, deal with it.

I very much doubt you are a business owner as well, so that makes us equal. Deal with it.

I won't argue semantics with you.

It looks like good business to me anyway.

Originally posted by MS Warehouse
When you declare for either Chapter 7, 11, or 13, you are declaring bankruptcy (for different purposes of course). There's no way to spin that.

It's a great business, anyone who tells you real estate isn't a good business is a robtard.. I mean retard.