General Primary Discussion Thread

Started by Time-Immemorial212 pages

New polls show Clinton 5 point ahead of Trump. This was only 2 weeks ago when everyone said "oh trump isn't serious..."

It will come down to Capitalizm vs Socialism, and Sad to say for you but Trump will be the next president and steer America back in the direction it once sailed.

Not only that but well get rid of the excess fat and stop this anchor baby problem once and for all. It's absurd to think we know people wait at the border till ready to pop, cross illegally to have the kid and then they are just "Americans" as well as their family cause their family broke th law.

You should bet some money on Trump winning.

I don't know Digi, you might hear more about "social" issues in the news, but I've always held that economic issues win elections. Some people care about same sex marriage and other equality issues. Everybody cares about jobs, insurance, etc.

I think Clinton would be far better for the economy than Trump.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I think Clinton would be far better for the economy than Trump.

On the economy? I disagree. I think that's the one thing Trump has her beat on.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I think Clinton would be far better for the economy than Trump.

I'm with PSmith. That's probably the one thing that Trump will Trump her on, solidly.

Edit - Wait...maybe not. His tariff ideas may be bad.

http://money.cnn.com/2015/07/28/news/economy/donald-trump-polls-taxes-wages/

With Trump we will most likely get the other 15 GOP hopefuls as cabnier members and Carson as the VP.

Solid

I could also see Romey as Sec State. He could fix everything Hilary has done.

Whoever said Hilary would be better with the economy is a joke. She charges schools $100k to speak at them which is a burden on the school and students. Trump does not take money from anyone.

Hilary good on the economy is like saying Hilary was good with emails. If she can't run her email server to code, she can't run the country.

Isn't everyone here tired of the Cliton Controversy and the excuse "OH MY, I had no idea."

Why Romney as Secretary of State? He has literally zero foreign policy experience.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial

Whoever said Hilary would be better with the economy is a joke. She charges schools $100k to speak at them which is a burden on the school and students. Trump does not take money from anyone.

Trump charges the same or more for speaking engagements as Hillary Clinton

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Hilary good on the economy is like saying Hilary was good with emails. If she can't run her email server to code, she can't run the country.

Isn't everyone here tired of the Cliton Controversy and the excuse "OH MY, I had no idea."

So far it seems like she has not done anything wrong regarding her email server, we'll see how it develops, but currently it is a scandal without evidence of wrongdoing.

Reminds me of the time you said Iran deal is a good deal Omega, I see you bowed out of your own thread too.

Bardock you joking right? She lied and said she never sent or recorded classified documents, they have found over 60 already. But to you that's not breaking the law or wrong doing I guess.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Why Romney as Secretary of State? He has literally zero foreign policy experience.

So you are one of those people that thinks the only people that can run government is government 😂

Are you so lost in la la land with the Horrendous Iran deal and have forgotten "by the people and for the people."

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Bardock you joking right? She lied and said she never sent or recorded classified documents, they have found over 60 already. But to you that's not breaking the law or wrong doing I guess.

I'm not joking. You pretend like she has been committed of wrongdoing. When we really don't know anything yet. The 60 you bring up were flagged as potentially containing classified information (albeit at the lowest levels), even if they did definitely contain classified information that does not mean Clinton did anything wrong yet. So like I said, right know we know almost nothing about this "scandal", your condemnation of her just shows your politics, not any conviction to the case.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
So you are one of those people that thinks the only people that can run government is government 😂

Are you so lost in la la land with the Horrendous Iran deal and have forgotten "by the people and for the people."

Omega Vision just asked for what reasons you think Romney would be a good Secretary of State.

Petraus got fined and forced out for less Bardock. Don't play your stupid games with me.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Petraus got fined and forced out for less Bardock. Don't play your stupid games with me.

That's really hard to compare, especially since we don't actually know what Clinton did exactly (or Petraeus)...and one may argue that Director of the CIA is a different position than Secretary of State, and different standards apply.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
So you are one of those people that thinks the only people that can run government is government 😂

Are you so lost in la la land with the Horrendous Iran deal and have forgotten "by the people and for the people."


Thank you for not actually addressing my question with this non sequitir of a post.

I'm not really opposed to Romney getting a cabinet position, but why Secretary of State of all positions? That would seem to be the one job (outside of Sec Def) that he's least qualified for.

Originally posted by Bardock42
That's really hard to compare, especially since we don't actually know what Clinton did exactly (or Petraeus)...and one may argue that Director of the CIA is a different position than Secretary of State, and different standards apply.

😂

Keep excusing your side.

Typical liberal

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Thank you for not actually addressing my question with this non sequitir of a post.

I'm not really opposed to Romney getting a cabinet position, but why Secretary of State of all positions? That would seem to be the one job (outside of Sec Def) that he's least qualified for.

He has Charisma.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
😂

Keep excusing your side.

Typical liberal

I'm not excusing, I'm just not prematurely condemning.

Goddamn. Some of the liberals on this site can actually argue rationally while some conservatives here scream bias. Life is a trip.