I honestly don't think Trump pulling out will be seen as that big of a deal, especially compared to the other things Trump has said and done.
I'm also not sure if he ever said he would 100% do it. I had heard that he and Bernie were thinking about it and if they did it the proceeds were going to charity.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
You keep saying the same thing over and over again, thinking its going to stick? But you are grasping at staws. You plagiarized and posted some random commentary without adding a source or your own comments.Now you keep repeating yourself like a parrot.
"So, what are you thoughts on Trump going back on his word in debating Sanders?'
I guess Trump and Hilary are smarter then Sanders😂
That much is clear.
While it's obvious you're not going to comment honestly on the topic and that's fine, I didn't expect you to when Trump is the subject, please at least learn what plagiarism means.
Plagiarize: "to use the words or ideas of another person as if they were your own words or ideas" (taken from Merriam-Webster)
So you see, using quotes and naming the person after the quote like I did would be the opposite of plagiary.
Originally posted by Surtur
I honestly don't think Trump pulling out will be seen as that big of a deal, especially compared to the other things Trump has said and done.I'm also not sure if he ever said he would 100% do it. I had heard that he and Bernie were thinking about it and if they did it the proceeds were going to charity.
He really didn't pull out of anything, he never even committed to it. There was nothing even on the books.
Trump is just playing Hilary and Sanders against each other, its working great, what Rob is trying to do is turn it into something else cause he rtard and does not have any actual substance of a debate so he's going to try and construct these trolling statements like this.
"Trump pulled a Hillary and ran from Sanders."
What he is trying to do is do a reverse, but it failed miserable because he will be voting for Hilary.
Originally posted by Robtard
While it's obvious you're not going to comment honestly on the topic and that's fine, I didn't expect you to when Trump is the subject, please at least learn what plagiarism means.Plagiarize: "to use the words or ideas of another person as if they were your own words or ideas" (taken from Merriam-Webster)
So you see, using quotes and naming the person after the quote like I did would be the opposite of plagiary.
You got caught trying to construct stupid little one liners that did not pan out the way you thought they would..
Originally posted by Surtur
I would of advised Trump to do it, if for nothing else then for what it would do to Hilary.
What he actually did was better because he made Hilary look bad for not wanting to take Bernie on, who is her actual rival on the democratic side. Trump has no obligation what so ever to debate the person who is going to lose the primary. Hilary on the other hand does, and she refuses to. This is the person Rob will vote for.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
What he actually did was better because he made Hilary look bad for not wanting to take Bernie on, who is her actual rival on the democratic side. Trump has no obligation what so ever to debate the person who is going to lose the primary. Hilary on the other hand does, and she refuses to.
True, but I think people will try to frame it in a way that makes Trump seem like Hilary.
This is the person Rob will vote for.
If I was someone who would absolutely never vote for Trump I would either not vote at all or just write-in the name of someone else. I'd rather people do that as opposed to just choosing Hilary by default.
This was actually days old news, Rob is the only one actually talking about it.
It will not be framed that way, it actually was already framed that Trump playing Sanders and Hilary against each other, as it already was framed this way. How do I know this, I watched Wolf Blitzer laughing about it while talking about it. Trump is under no contractual of pre set agreement to debate Sanders, the loser of the primary process. The winner of the republican primary has never debated the loser of the opposite primary.
Just because rob is able to construct these little bashing/troll statements does not mean this is the way the story is going or how it was framed. He was doing nothing more then trying to troll.
Originally posted by Surtur
I honestly don't think Trump pulling out will be seen as that big of a deal, especially compared to the other things Trump has said and done.I'm also not sure if he ever said he would 100% do it. I had heard that he and Bernie were thinking about it and if they did it the proceeds were going to charity.
Yeah, will likely go away soon enough.
I posted the quote, he said he would do it and when it came down to start setting things in motion to make it a reality he backed out.
Originally posted by Robtard
Yeah, will likely go away soon enough.I posted the quote, he said he would do it and when it came down to start setting things in motion to make it a reality he backed out.
Are you unaware of the game of chess?
Where is Trumps obligation to debate the loser of the democratic primary?
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Are you unaware of the game of chess?Where is Trumps obligation to debate the loser of the democratic primary?
Trumpers claim everything Trump does is "strategy".
He absolutely has none, but again, no one forced him to make the claim that he would.
You got on Hillary's ass for not debating Sanders, but Trump going back on his own claim is "strategy". So why wasn't it strategy when Clinton did it?
He has no strategy😂
You are in total denial, he cleared 18 other seasoned political candidates out.
Read his books you rtroll.
It was you who got on Hilaries ass for not debating Sanders you baffoon.
You just said Hilary ran from Sanders, stop trying to play both sides because you got caught red handed.
Hilary has an obligation to the democrats to debate her rival, Trump has zero obligation to debate the loser of the democratic primary.
Originally posted by Robtard
Trumpers claim everything Trump does is "strategy".He absolutely has none, but again, no one forced him to make the claim that he would.
Lies
http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/07/politics/donald-trump-new-york-delegates/
http://www.wsj.com/articles/behind-donald-trumps-attack-strategy-1453685141
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/428700/donald-trump-campaign-strategy-turnout
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Lieshttp://www.cnn.com/2016/04/07/politics/donald-trump-new-york-delegates/
http://www.wsj.com/articles/behind-donald-trumps-attack-strategy-1453685141
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/428700/donald-trump-campaign-strategy-turnout
Just saying "lies" over and over means nothing, are you actually claiming that I lied about Trump saying he'd debate Sanders? Cos it's known he said it.
Originally posted by Robtard
Trumpers claim everything Trump does is "strategy".He absolutely has none, but again, no one forced him to make the claim that he would.
Lies
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...8198_story.html
http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/07/polit...york-delegates/
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/201...vention-n545231
http://www.wsj.com/articles/behind-...tegy-1453685141