Originally posted by DarkSaint85
8/10? 7/10?At least 5/10 just on pressure points alone, from what celey told me. Adding on his strength (which even Damborg acknowledges is greater than Thor's) gives him 2 more, and I'd give 1 more for greater durability (which you can argue about, I guess).
Be honest with me. Do you give Supes 10/10 here? No one posted scans of pressure points for Thor. You did though. What do you give him?
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
8/10? 7/10?At least 5/10 just on pressure points alone, from what celey told me. Adding on his strength (which even Damborg acknowledges is greater than Thor's) gives him 2 more, and I'd give 1 more for greater durability (which you can argue about, I guess).
For you people talking about the strength and durability edge, even if you buy into that, if you took two highly trained men and pitted them against each other, and one was 260 pounds of muscle and the other was 272 pounds of muscle, would you base your 10 fight prediction on their size and give 10 out of 10 to the 272 pound guy when you have all sorts of other data on the two combatants? That's what a lot of you are saying. I'm telling you that any difference is strength and durability is negligible at beast and wouldn't be the highest consideration. Thor is the better combatant IMO, thus, he wins.
Originally posted by carver9
How does Thor get two wins?
Originally posted by Stoic
With equalized speed and no powers except for strength, durability, and fighting skills. I think that Thor could at least pull 2-3/10.
Agreed.
Also, there aren't 10 fights here....
Also, BZ me. Everyone here can see that I have been challenging you. I even gave you an extra few days to think about your picks, and fought a BZ with Leo in the interim...
Originally posted by Blue Area Vet
Thor's durability is just as high as Superman's, it's just not "hard" durability. He can take anything Superman can take and vice versa.
Originally posted by Blue Area Vet
For you people talking about the strength and durability edge, even if you buy into that, if you took two highly trained men and pitted them against each other, and one was 260 pounds of muscle and the other was 272 pounds of muscle, would you base your 10 fight prediction on their size and give 10 out of 10 to the 272 pound guy when you have all sorts of other data on the two combatants? That's what a lot of you are saying. I'm telling you that any difference is strength and durability is negligible at beast and wouldn't be the highest consideration. Thor is the better combatant IMO, thus, he wins.
And Superman is considerably stronger and far more durable than Thor.
