Is God's moral above humans?

Started by Bentley8 pages

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
The Christian god was created by humans. Therefore god's morals are human in origin.

God's morals are equal with humans morals.

While your reasoning makes sense, I'd have to mention that fictional characters don't necessarily have the same morals than their creators. You could make a violent counter-argument such as this: "When non-human morals are interpreted by humans, they become human morals", but I don't think that assumption makes much sense for different reasons.

But maybe we are using a different meaning for the word "morals"?

Originally posted by Bentley
While your reasoning makes sense, I'd have to mention that fictional characters don't necessarily have the same morals than their creators. You could make a violent counter-argument such as this: "When non-human morals are interpreted by humans, they become human morals", but I don't think that assumption makes much sense for different reasons.

But maybe we are using a different meaning for the word "morals"?

True fictional Characters can have morals that are different then what is considered to be human morality. For example, the god of the old testament has a morality that would get a human arrested for mass murder.

Back in the day being a mass murderer could also make you into a national mythical hero 😉

Originally posted by Bentley
Back in the day being a mass murderer could also make you into a national mythical hero 😉

That seems to support my argument.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
That seems to support my argument.

Depends on what your point was (other than lightly poking christian posters 😛 ). I think we've agreed before that human morality is a thing that changes over time.

The Christian god was created by humans. Therefore god's morals are human in origin.

God's morals are equal with humans morals.


Prove the Christian God was created by humans. There, your entire argument just fell apart.

Prove the Abrahamic God is the real God and not a flawed man made interpretation.

Originally posted by Lestov16
Prove the Abrahamic God is the real God and not a flawed man made interpretation.

Cant shift the burden of proof on me right after i said that. This entire discussion is has been about an omnipotent being, which negates the idea of man creating him since man is fallible. Furthermore, asking me to prove a negative is amusing.

But you seem certain the Abrahamic God is the true interpretation. This thread is about whether God is infallible, but we are only using the Yahweh interpretation as a reference, as though it is impossible that it's not the real interpretation of Him.

If we're only arguing about the Abrahamic God and no possible ones, then the thread title should just be "Is the Christian God morally perfect?", because we aren't talking about the objectively real God, just the Abrabamic interpretation of Him. It's foolish to automatically assume the Christian God is absolutely 100% the real one and not one of many flawed interpretations.

Originally posted by psmith81992
Prove the Christian God was created by humans. There, your entire argument just fell apart.

The god of the bible comes from the bible, of course. Most of the bible is fiction, and that means the god of the bible is also fiction.

I suppose you want me to prove that the bible is fiction. Well here is a good start:
http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/

Lets take it from the beginning: The bible states that the Earth and universe was created in 6 days, however, we now know that the universe evolved over a very long time. Over 13 billion years ago, the universe changed to create the big bang which was nether big nor a bang. The Earth itself is over 4 1/2 billion years old. Therefore the story of Genesis is just a story and not fact. That also means that the god of Genesis is also fictional. The rest of the bible simply follows Genesis.

Calling the bible fiction begs proof. Saying the bible is fiction because pf the 6 day discrepancy means you have a child's understanding of the bible. The days aren't considered 24 hour days. There goes your argument again. Please have something substantial next time, not something coming from an adolescent.

Originally posted by psmith81992
Calling the bible fiction begs proof. Saying the bible is fiction because pf the 6 day discrepancy means you have a child's understanding of the bible. The days aren't considered 24 hour days. There goes your argument again. Please have something substantial next time, not something coming from an adolescent.

I don't know why you are so hostel. Perhaps its because my argument has more merit then you wish to admit.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I don't know why you are so hostel. Perhaps its because my argument has more merit then you wish to admit.
Your argument has zero merit. Your reasoning sounds like its the very first time you argued this in your life.

Originally posted by psmith81992
Your argument has zero merit. Your reasoning sounds like its the very first time you argued this in your life.

Why should I believe you?

My reasoning is perfectly sound.

Superman is in a comic called, Superman. The comic that superman is in is fiction, therefore, Superman is fiction.

So, if the god of the bible is part of a fictional story, then that god is also fiction.

We can tell that the bible is fiction by looking at its content and comparing it to what science knows today. Without a shadow of a doubt, the bible is mostly fictional. Therefore the god of the bible is also fictional. That means any morals attributed to god, are really a reflection of human morals.

IDK WTF everyone is getting riled up about. Of course the great God Zeus and the 12 Olympians are morally perfect. Blessed be to our true Gods, since based on Star's argument, we can't prove they don't exist.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Why should I believe you?

My reasoning is perfectly sound.

Superman is in a comic called, Superman. The comic that superman is in is fiction, therefore, Superman is fiction.

So, if the god of the bible is part of a fictional story, then that god is also fiction.

We can tell that the bible is fiction by looking at its content and comparing it to what science knows today. Without a shadow of a doubt, the bible is mostly fictional. Therefore the god of the bible is also fictional. That means any morals attributed to god, are really a reflection of human morals.

Simply saying your reasoning is sound and then claiming god is fictional because he didn't create the world in 6 days is absurd.

Originally posted by psmith81992
I'm not saying this is God's reasoning but you DO realize that the God we describe knows what everybody is going to do until they die, right? So babies are innocent as far as you understand.

You do realise you cut your head in order to save an arm, right?

1.) If god already knows everything that is going to happen before it happens and punishes someone for it before they commit the crime then there in no such thing as free will. I don't need to beat you in an argument, you do it yourself; like a typical theist.

2.) Let's examine the original sin that caused the downfall of man. As we all know Adam and Eve were commanded to not eat from the tree of knowledge, otherwise they would die.

But if we consider what you said and what christians belief then god has omniscience and if that much is true then god had knowledge of what Adam and Eve were going to do way before they even were created.

This means he purposefully put the tree in the middle of the garden in order for them to eat from the tree. This is morally grotesque and proves my original point.

Originally posted by psmith81992
That isn't context. You're essentially taking something you call context (it isn't), not delving deeper into any of it, then saying "god sucks". I realize going deeper into everything you criticize is going to kill your argument so I understand why you don't do it.

Are you serious? I've told you the context already. I'm not hiding anything and anyone that has read the bible can verify it.

Do you understand how quotation marks work? If you can't find the post where I state "god sucks" then concede and if you can I'll concede.
Anyways, just to move this debate forward, I'll gladly post the full context. But that's as far as I'm willing to go; I'm not going to post the whole bible.
[spoiler=Context] Adam and Eve
4 This is the account of the heavens and the earth when they were created, when the Lord God made the earth and the heavens.

5 Now no shrub had yet appeared on the earth[a] and no plant had yet sprung up, for the Lord God had not sent rain on the earth and there was no one to work the ground, 6 but streams[b] came up from the earth and watered the whole surface of the ground. 7 Then the Lord God formed a man[c] from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being.

8 Now the Lord God had planted a garden in the east, in Eden; and there he put the man he had formed. 9 The Lord God made all kinds of trees grow out of the ground—trees that were pleasing to the eye and good for food. In the middle of the garden were the tree of life and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.

10 A river watering the garden flowed from Eden; from there it was separated into four headwaters. 11 The name of the first is the Pishon; it winds through the entire land of Havilah, where there is gold. 12 (The gold of that land is good; aromatic resin[d] and onyx are also there.) 13 The name of the second river is the Gihon; it winds through the entire land of Cush.[e] 14 The name of the third river is the Tigris; it runs along the east side of Ashur. And the fourth river is the Euphrates.

15 The Lord God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to work it and take care of it. 16 And the Lord God commanded the man, “You are free to eat from any tree in the garden; 17 but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat from it you will certainly die.”

18 The Lord God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him.”

19 Now the Lord God had formed out of the ground all the wild animals and all the birds in the sky. He brought them to the man to see what he would name them; and whatever the man called each living creature, that was its name. 20 So the man gave names to all the livestock, the birds in the sky and all the wild animals.

But for Adam[f] no suitable helper was found. 21 So the Lord God caused the man to fall into a deep sleep; and while he was sleeping, he took one of the man’s ribs[g] and then closed up the place with flesh. 22 Then the Lord God made a woman from the rib[h] he had taken out of the man, and he brought her to the man.

23 The man said,

“This is now bone of my bones
and flesh of my flesh;
she shall be called ‘woman,’
for she was taken out of man.”
24 That is why a man leaves his father and mother and is united to his wife, and they become one flesh.

25 Adam and his wife were both naked, and they felt no shame.

The Fall
3 Now the serpent was more crafty than any of the wild animals the Lord God had made. He said to the woman, “Did God really say, ‘You must not eat from any tree in the garden’?”

2 The woman said to the serpent, “We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden, 3 but God did say, ‘You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die.’”

4 “You will not certainly die,” the serpent said to the woman. 5 “For God knows that when you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.”

6 When the woman saw that the fruit of the tree was good for food and pleasing to the eye, and also desirable for gaining wisdom, she took some and ate it. She also gave some to her husband, who was with her, and he ate it. 7 Then the eyes of both of them were opened, and they realized they were naked; so they sewed fig leaves together and made coverings for themselves.

8 Then the man and his wife heard the sound of the Lord God as he was walking in the garden in the cool of the day, and they hid from the Lord God among the trees of the garden. 9 But the Lord God called to the man, “Where are you?”

10 He answered, “I heard you in the garden, and I was afraid because I was naked; so I hid.”

11 And he said, “Who told you that you were naked? Have you eaten from the tree that I commanded you not to eat from?”

12 The man said, “The woman you put here with me—she gave me some fruit from the tree, and I ate it.”

13 Then the Lord God said to the woman, “What is this you have done?”

The woman said, “The serpent deceived me, and I ate.”

14 So the Lord God said to the serpent, “Because you have done this,

“Cursed are you above all livestock
and all wild animals!
You will crawl on your belly
and you will eat dust
all the days of your life.
15 And I will put enmity
between you and the woman,
and between your offspring[a] and hers;
he will crush[b] your head,
and you will strike his heel.”
16 To the woman he said,

“I will make your pains in childbearing very severe;
with painful labor you will give birth to children.
Your desire will be for your husband,
and he will rule over you.”
17 To Adam he said, “Because you listened to your wife and ate fruit from the tree about which I commanded you, ‘You must not eat from it,’

“Cursed is the ground because of you;
through painful toil you will eat food from it
all the days of your life.
18 It will produce thorns and thistles for you,
and you will eat the plants of the field.
19 By the sweat of your brow
you will eat your food
until you return to the ground,
since from it you were taken;
for dust you are
and to dust you will return.”
20 Adam[c] named his wife Eve,[d] because she would become the mother of all the living.

21 The Lord God made garments of skin for Adam and his wife and clothed them. 22 And the Lord God said, “The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil. He must not be allowed to reach out his hand and take also from the tree of life and eat, and live forever.” 23 So the Lord God banished him from the Garden of Eden to work the ground from which he had been taken. 24 After he drove the man out, he placed on the east side[e] of the Garden of Eden cherubim and a flaming sword flashing back and forth to guard the way to the tree of life.[/spoiler]

Originally posted by psmith81992
Simply saying your reasoning is sound and then claiming god is fictional because he didn't create the world in 6 days is absurd.

That's not what he said.

What he actually said:

Originally posted by Shakyamunison

Lets take it from the beginning: The bible states that the Earth and universe was created in 6 days, however, we now know that the universe evolved over a very long time. Over 13 billion years ago, the universe changed to create the big bang which was nether big nor a bang. The Earth itself is over 4 1/2 billion years old. Therefore the story of Genesis is just a story and not fact. That also means that the god of Genesis is also fictional. The rest of the bible simply follows Genesis.

I agree with his post but it's a common argument that theologians and theist easily brush aside by either saying it was a mistranslation (it means something else) it is a metaphor. Both equally insane.

A better argument as to why science goes against the bible is by using this quote:

"1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 2 Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.

3 And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. 4 God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night.” And there was evening, and there was morning—the first day."

According to the bible god first created Earth and the heavens and then he created light (stars). But it is clear that stars were first formed and then the planets.

Of course, theist like to point out the metaphoric parts of the bible that are somewhat compatible with science, but neglect these quotes.

You do realise you cut your head in order to save an arm, right?

1.) If god already knows everything that is going to happen before it happens and punishes someone for it before they commit the crime then there in no such thing as free will. I don't need to beat you in an argument, you do it yourself; like a typical theist.

I'm consistently making you look bad and then you post something even dumber. God knowing everything doesn't negate free will, because WE don't know all. Therefore we have free will or the illusion of free will. I mean it's cute that you keep trying but it just keeps getting dumber and dumber.

Dealing with simple minded atheists is simple.

Originally posted by psmith81992
Simply saying your reasoning is sound and then claiming god is fictional because he didn't create the world in 6 days is absurd.

You really don't contribute to the conversation.

If we are talking about the man made god of the bible, then it is not absurd.