European Migration Crisis

This entire situation is basically just full of fail now. They helped out some refugee's at the expense of some of their own citizens.

I wonder if Merkel thinks history will look back at her fondly for this?

They helped out over a million refugees. Your usage of the word "some" is misleading.

So my usage of the word at the expense of "some" of their citizens, misleading too right?

Originally posted by Surtur
So my usage of the word at the expense of "some" of their citizens, misleading too right?

Not comparatively. Your usage of the word "some" when it comes to migrants who are helped is something like THREE magnitudes larger than your usage of the word "some" when it comes to the expense paid in crime.

Okay but again, not comparing it, but is or is not the statement I said true? It's either a yes or no.

Of course we both know the answer, don't we?

Originally posted by Surtur
Okay but again, not comparing it, but is or is not the statement I said true? It's either a yes or no.

It's not. Your usage of "some" when it comes to migrant makes your statement false.

Okay so you obviously can't answer a simple question, but f*ck it, we both know the answer anyways. I might as well be asking you what 1+1 is.

This is the same thing Bardock did in the thread about the Supreme Court.

Originally posted by Surtur
Okay so you obviously can't answer a simple question, but f*ck it, we both know the answer anyways. I might as well be asking you what 1+1 is.

Are you ****ing kidding me? You asked me "Is the statement I made true?" and I answered "It's not", and then explained why. How much simpler do you want me to answer your question?

No, I flat out asked you then if my statement about them helping people at the expense of some of their citizens was true. Then you danced around it like f*cking Ali. I specifically asked you about the part about it being done at the expense of the citizens. You then got f*cking hung up on the word "some".

So yeah like I said, at this point you don't need to answer..the answer is apparent.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Are you ****ing kidding me? You asked me "Is the statement I made true?" and I answered "It's not", and then explained why. How much simpler do you want me to answer your question?

That's all he does is dance on the Internet cause I'm real life he would crush a person.

Originally posted by Surtur
So my usage of the word at the expense of "some" of their citizens, misleading too right?

Right here, right f*cking here. I didn't argue your point about the "millions not equating to some" part, and asked this.

What is so hard to comprehend? Either they helped out refugee's at the expense of some of their citizens or they didn't.

Originally posted by Slay
He would like you to answer ''Yes, it is''.

I want a yes or no answer to a yes or no question. I think I made it pretty clear that I was focusing on the part about it being done at the expense of citizens. Even if you want to say "it's justified because they helped out a lot" that doesn't actually negate what I was saying.

Let me ask you: did you understand what I was asking?

Originally posted by Surtur
So my usage of the word at the expense of "some" of their citizens, misleading too right?

Yes.

Explanation:
It's misleading in the context because of the complete different magnitudes in your statement.

Aside:
If your statement had only been "Germany helped the refugees at the expense of some of its citizens" then it would not be misleading. (that's a fancy way of saying that in that case it would be "No" as an answer)

Is this answer comprehensible for you, you buffoon?

Originally posted by Bardock42
Is this answer comprehensible for you, you buffoon?

I would've gone for simpleton internet tough guy, but nice one. 👆

Originally posted by Bardock42
[b]Yes. [/B]

There, was that so hard?

Originally posted by Slay
I would've gone for simpleton internet tough guy, but nice one. 👆

Internet tough guys are the best kinds of tough guys. I always love it when I see posters behaving in the exact same manner they bash other posters for behaving.

Originally posted by Surtur
There, was that so hard?

Internet tough guys are the best kinds of tough guys. I always love it when I see posters behaving in the exact same manner they bash other posters for behaving.

I'd ask you whether reading my initial answer and understanding it was hard, but then you completely failed to and needed it spelled out, so I suppose it was.

Again, you talking to others about their reading comprehension? Classic. Please, tell me more.

Originally posted by Bardock42
[b]Yes.

Explanation:
It's misleading in the context because of the complete different magnitudes in your statement.

Aside:
If your statement had only been "Germany helped the refugees at the expense of some of its citizens" then it would not be misleading. (that's a fancy way of saying that in that case it would be "No" as an answer)

Is this answer comprehensible for you, you buffoon? [/B]

Before you call people a Baffoon have you looked in the mirror or the scale lately?