14 year old boy makes a clock - Is arrested by Police

Started by long pig39 pages

Originally posted by Q99
True in some cases, but even so, they didn't even react like they thought he had a bomb. And acknowledge he wasn't trying to make a mock bomb.

They didn't act accordingly, I agree. People responsible for the oversight will be punished for not acting quicker to remove him.

They didnt know what exactly he made. The way he was acting(literally... He was coached), his religion raised even more suspicion. They had to remove him.

The media came in their pants and couldn't wait to show the world how racist the white man is and how oppressed the muzzies are.
The useful idiots ate it up.

Originally posted by red g jacks
you only need one reason when you think about it... muslim

3 is just overkill


Its enough to be suspicious.

Originally posted by long pig
Lol, bombs arent big round and black with a fuse stickiing out. It looked close enough to a homemade bomb, he was Muslim and he was acting strange about it. All three reasons are good enough to call the cops.

Putting a clock display in a homemade bomb is a lot of effort for something you take time to build. If I was planning to bomb something that'd seem like a hassle.

But they get to be amateurish I guess.

You put the clock display on it to give the Bomb Disposal a false sense of security as to how long they have to defuse the bomb.

If i made a bomb I'd hang truck nutts on it.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]You put the clock display on it to give the Bomb Disposal a false sense of security as to how long they have to defuse the bomb. [/B]

Why not have it explode before the Bomb Disposal team arrives?

At this point I'm overthinking this awesr

Originally posted by marwash22
i'm also not about to read 12 pages of this, but I'll throw in my two cents.

I wholeheartedly believe that this kid intentionally caused a stir just to get his 15 minutes and go viral. I don't at all put it past a 14yo to be aware enough of the climate and his ethnicity, and think it would be a funny prank to do this during the week of 9/11.

If you wholeheartedly believe something without any evidence, you're a ****ing idiot.

So it's painfully obvious long pig is too ****ing stupid and/or stubborn to actually provide any evidence of his claim. He was too dumb to do so when he said most serial killers are black, so I had to prove his claim for him. I'm not doing it again though.

Originally posted by long pig
Lol, bombs arent big round and black with a fuse stickiing out. It looked close enough to a homemade bomb, he was Muslim and he was acting strange about it. All three reasons are good enough to call the cops.
"looked close enough to a homemade bomb" to retards who have no conception of explosives or how they work... sure

anyone who thinks that a circuit board hooked to a digital display with nothing else might be a 'bomb' has no business teaching any sort of engineering oriented field... also their right to vote/breed should be revoked

I do have a question though, people have called this racial profiling and all that stuff and it probably was.

My question would be has racial profiling ever helped save a lot of people? As in..a bomb was thwarted because someone saw a Muslim and got nervous and it turned out the person had a bomb.

I guess I'm wondering if it ever helps a situation or if racial profiling does nothing but hinder.

Originally posted by Surtur
I do have a question though, people have called this racial profiling and all that stuff and it probably was.

My question would be has racial profiling ever helped save a lot of people? As in..a bomb was thwarted because someone saw a Muslim and got nervous and it turned out the person had a bomb.

I guess I'm wondering if it ever helps a situation or if racial profiling does nothing but hinder.


In the same way that general extreme paranoia has, yes, I'm sure, but that doesn't mean we should encourage either.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
In the same way that general extreme paranoia has, yes, I'm sure, but that doesn't mean we should encourage either.

Lets say you have the power to magically make it so nobody is ever racially profiled again. Yet you also know that perhaps maybe 1 out of 100 times..the profiling might save a whole bunch of lives.

What do you do?

Originally posted by NemeBro
If you wholeheartedly believe something without any evidence, you're a ****ing idiot.

So it's painfully obvious long pig is too ****ing stupid and/or stubborn to actually provide any evidence of his claim. He was too dumb to do so when he said most serial killers are black, so I had to prove his claim for him. I'm not doing it again though.


Common sense should be enough to figure out what happened. Also, you'll never find a husband is you're angry all the time. Cheer up!

Originally posted by red g jacks
"looked close enough to a homemade bomb" to retards who have no conception of explosives or how they work... sure

anyone who thinks that a circuit board hooked to a digital display with nothing else might be a 'bomb' has no business teaching any sort of engineering oriented field... also their right to vote/breed should be revoked


Close enough to fulfill the zero tolerance protocol for calling the police. That's all that really matters.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lets say you have the power to magically make it so nobody is ever racially profiled again. Yet you also know that perhaps maybe 1 out of 100 times..the profiling might save a whole bunch of lives.

What do you do?

Let's say you have a 5% percent rate of violent crimes in a year. Let's then say that randomly lynching a guy each semester makes it fall to 1%. What do you do?

Originally posted by Bentley
Let's say you have a 5% percent rate of violent crimes in a year. Let's then say that randomly lynching a guy each semester makes it fall to 1%. What do you do?

But you're talking about guaranteed murder. Murder would have to happen for the crime rate to fall.

You might say murder could happen as a result of racial profiling, but it wouldn't be guaranteed.

Originally posted by Surtur
But you're talking about guaranteed murder. Murder would have to happen for the crime rate to fall.

You might say murder could happen as a result of racial profiling, but it wouldn't be guaranteed.

My post was meant to be an hypothetical scenario emulating the one you proposed.

i do think racial profiling is a legit police tactic tbh

profiling is inherent in criminal justice... so saying that particular characteristics are off limits for building a profile for the sake of 'civil rights,' while probably well intentioned, is counter productive and irrational. also it will really come down to a cop's discretion.. so there's no real strategy for enforcing the rule that racial profiling not be used

Originally posted by long pig
Close enough to fulfill the zero tolerance protocol for calling the police. That's all that really matters.
i assume the zero tolerance policy you refer to is "zero tolerance for muslims", amirite?

Originally posted by red g jacks
i do think racial profiling is a legit police tactic tbh

profiling is inherent in criminal justice... so saying that particular characteristics are off limits for building a profile for the sake of 'civil rights,' while probably well intentioned, is counter productive and irrational. also it will really come down to a cop's discretion.. so there's no real strategy for enforcing the rule that racial profiling not be used

We can argue specifics about profiling in a separate thread, since it could be interesting. But I am under the impression that debating here would pollute the discussion quickly.

Originally posted by red g jacks
i do think racial profiling is a legit police tactic tbh

profiling is inherent in criminal justice... so saying that particular characteristics are off limits for building a profile for the sake of 'civil rights,' while probably well intentioned, is counter productive and irrational. also it will really come down to a cop's discretion.. so there's no real strategy for enforcing the rule that racial profiling not be used
i assume the zero tolerance policy you refer to is "zero tolerance for muslims", amirite?


Devout muslims or the mythical "moderate" Muslim?

is that a question? it has a question mark but it doesn't feel like you're actually asking me anything.

Originally posted by red g jacks
is that a question? it has a question mark but it doesn't feel like you're actually asking me anything.

Don't let your feelings distort reality. The question mark exists, therefore you should respond accordingly.
I believe in you.