Look at his goody, the parents won't even cooperate.
“Under Texas law, a person is guilty of possessing a hoax bomb if he possesses a device that is intended to cause anyone to be alarmed or a reaction of any type by law enforcement officers,†said Irving police Chief Larry Boyd.
And then here is the sister admitting suspension for bomb threat, 3 years earlier.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
You claimed that the daily beast falsified its report is a failure and now you trying to lie about their motives.You still failed to provide any proof on your claim that "corporations don't give to charity."
Where are you on that btw?
I never claimed their interview was false. If you thought I was implying that you are completely wrong. I was clearly just showing that her quote from that interview was being distorted by your articles.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
And then here is the sister admitting suspension for bomb threat, 3 years earlier.
LOL that links back to the Daily Beast interview as well. Do you have any articles that have sources that aren't just distortions of the girls quote from TDB interview? Doesn't seem you do.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Look at his goody, the parents won't even cooperate.“Under Texas law, a person is guilty of possessing a hoax bomb if he possesses a device that is intended to cause anyone to be alarmed or a reaction of any type by law enforcement officers,†said Irving police Chief Larry Boyd.
Yes, the problem is it's incredibly difficult to prove someone's intention.
You mention a person's history is viable in court. Yes, but you are not talking about his history, you are talking about his sister's history. If you present your argument of "Well, I believe a member of his family did something wrong, and so that means he DEFINITELY did" in court you'd get laughed out of it.
And of course the parents aren't cooperating, they have no reason to.
Your whole argument is so far fetched, you seem to be implying that the kid is some kind of magical fortune teller who can see into the future, who knew all this would happen as a result of bringing a gutted clock to school.
I don't need to be a moral authority in order to know what proof is. Proof is proof, you can prove something on the internet, absolutely. Just because you aren't smart enough to doesn't mean it's impossible.
Originally posted by BackFire
Yes, the problem is it's incredibly difficult to prove someone's intention.You mention a person's history is viable in court. Yes, but you are not talking about his history, you are talking about his sister's history. If you present your argument of "Well, I believe a member of his family did something wrong, and so that means he DEFINITELY did" in court you'd get laughed out of it.
And of course the parents aren't cooperating, they have no reason to.
Your whole argument is so far fetched, you seem to be implying that the kid is some kind of magical fortune teller who can see into the future, who knew all this would happen as a result of bringing a gutted clock to school.
I don't need to be a moral authority in order to know what proof is. Proof is proof, you can prove something on the internet, absolutely. Just because you aren't smart enough to doesn't mean it's impossible.
You haven't proved anything, so I guess you are not smart enough either. Your not very good at this are you.
Originally posted by Lestov16
LOL that links back to the Daily Beast interview as well. Do you have any articles that have sources that aren't just distortions of the girls quote from TDB interview? Doesn't seem you do.
Do you have any sources that prove that corporations don't give to charity? Doesn't seem you do.
Re: 14 year old boy makes a clock - Is arrested by Police
Originally posted by Bardock42
http://www.theverge.com/2015/9/16/9335965/ahmed-mohamed-14-year-old-arrested-clock-hoax-bombThis is spot on. This is exactly what racists (like some people on this board) cause, a culture where minorities are attacked and dissuaded, even if they are exceptionally talented and gifted.
Where is it proven that this was racism btw?
Originally posted by Lestov16
So you admit you have no legitimate sources verifying your claim of this girl.
So you admit you have no legitimate sources for your claim as well, and you made them up without even posting anything from any website to substantiate your claim.
Also nothing I posted about the sister came from the daily beast and the daily beast does not refer to her sister at all, so you are a liar.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
You haven't proved anything, so I guess you are not smart enough either. Your not very good at this are you.
I already explained to you that my stance doesn't necessitate proof. I'm not assuming his guilt. You are. I'm not claiming proof. You are. I'm simply engaging in a discussion, where as you are attempting to end the discussion by lying about having proven something that you are mentally incapable of proving.
Originally posted by BackFire
I already explained to you that my stance doesn't necessitate proof. I'm not assuming his guilt. You are. I'm not claiming proof. You are. I'm simply engaging in a discussion, where as you are attempting to end the discussion by lying about having proven something that you are mentally incapable of proving.
Insulting your way to a win wont work, post proof or deal with it. I lied about nothing, I posted my sources, nice try bucko.
Originally posted by Lestov16
Stop trying to throw the thread off topicDo you have any sources for your claims of the sister that are not distortions of TDB interview?
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
So you admit you have no legitimate sources for your claim as well, and you made them up without even posting anything from any website to substantiate your claim.Also nothing I posted about the sister came from the daily beast and the daily beast does not refer to her sister at all, so you are a liar.