Originally posted by BackFire
She doesn't have to admit it, but there has to be proof beyond what is currently available, which is little/nothing. Actual documentation of some kind.But regardless, her guilt/innocence has nothing to do with what her brother did.
Her guilt 100% relates to what her brother did. It shows how he was raised. If his sister does alarming things, he most likely is also inclined to. His sister has been recorded showing hostility and a lack of respect for the school.
Originally posted by Omega Vision
Seems to be a recurrent tactic of conservatives to whitewash racism and police brutality/overreaction by trying to dig up any scrap of evidence that the victimized minority is anything less than an absolute saint.
Originally posted by long pig
Like how the left dug up and personally attacked the lady refusing to marry gays?
Libbos are the ones know for evil tactics.
Originally posted by Omega Vision
Let's just cut to the chase: even if Ahmed is a shitty little troublemaker looking to make a media firestorm (I don't think he is, at all), the teachers and cops played right into his plans by being terrible racists.Either way you look at it: there was some serious racial profiling going on.
Originally posted by long pig
What more do you want? A recording? I'm not being sarcastic.Her guilt 100% relates to what her brother did. It shows how he was raised. If his sister does alarming things, he most likely is also inclined to. His sister has been recorded showing hostility and a lack of respect for the school.
As I said, documentation would be nice. A recording would be fine. Of course such a thing won't exist.
It absolutely does not. Brothers and sisters can be very different from one another, they can have completely different personalities. Which is why you see any number of successful celebrities who have screwed up siblings with drug/alcohol problems.
Have you spoken to a teenager before? Showing respect is often not a strong point of theirs.
Originally posted by Omega Vision
Some people did that, but it wasn't necessary. Her refusing to do her job and trying to force her religious views on other people was sufficient cause to disapprove of her. Nice try though.
Anytime anyone disagree with libbos, they get attacked. Its what you people do.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
There is proof she did it, so there is no getting out of that one😂
There is no proof. Her getting suspended for something in itself is not proof that she's a little terrorist. The school could simply be wrong, or it could be right. The point is not enough information is known for it to be worth worrying about.
Even if we assume she did do it, it was when she was in middle school, it could be chalked up to a kid saying something stupid out of anger and without thinking, as kids (and some adults on this site) often do.
Originally posted by long pig
Some did it, none tried to stop it. Same happened with the store who refused to make a gay cake.Anytime anyone disagree with libbos, they get attacked. Its what you people do.
Originally posted by BackFire
There is no proof. Her getting suspended for something in itself is not proof that she's a little terrorist. The school could simply be wrong, or it could be right. The point is not enough information is known for it to be worth worrying about.Even if we assume she did do it, it was when she was in middle school, it could be chalked up to a kid saying something stupid out of anger and without thinking, as kids (and some adults on this site) often do.
Do you **** with me on purpose or are you just a god damn elawyer playing games with me, do you want me bend over and believe this one as well😂
HE KNEW WHAT HE WAS DOING!!!!!!!!
Originally posted by BackFire
As I said, documentation would be nice. A recording would be fine. Of course such a thing won't exist.It absolutely does not. Brothers and sisters can be very different from one another, they can have completely different personalities. Which is why you see any number of successful celebrities who have screwed up siblings with drug/alcohol problems.
Have you spoken to a teenager before? Showing respect is often not a strong point of theirs.
Obviously brothers and sisters aren't identical. But logic dictates they are generally brought up the same and given the same values. We've seen their parents are SJW dbags. We know their religion is anti western.
Its OK to judge.
Originally posted by Omega Vision
Here's the thing about Kim Davis: that she'd gotten divorced several times despite her particular sect forbidding divorce and remarriage showed that she didn't really have much in the way of religious principle, so it was ridiculous claiming that religious principle prevented her from handing out marriage licenses to gay couples.
Originally posted by Omega Vision
Here's the thing about Kim Davis: that she'd gotten divorced several times despite her particular sect forbidding divorce and remarriage showed that she didn't really have much in the way of religious principle, so it was ridiculous claiming that religious principle prevented her from handing out marriage licenses to gay couples.
What on earth does this have to do with the clock maker? She wasn't bringing fake bombs to work, so what relevance is this?
Originally posted by long pig
You're being irrational.Obviously brothers and sisters aren't identical. But logic dictates they are generally brought up the same and given the same values. We've seen their parents are SJW dbags. We know their religion is anti western.
Its OK to judge.
No, I'm being extremely rational.
Their values can also be different, a big part of growing up happens outside of the home and doesn't involve the parents. Friends are a big part of it, and someone's personality directly involves what kind of values may stick and may not stick. Just because two people grow up in the same house absolutely does not mean they share identical world views or share eachother's guilt.
Their religion can be anti western, it can also not be anti western.
TI, I don't care about you or what you believe. I'm simply telling you that there is no actual proof here, which made this instance of you trying to do a childish victory dance about how you won the thread particularly idiotic.
Its not about what I believe, that facts are his sister did the same thing, this kid knew this was going to cause controversy and he played games with the police. There was no project that day AT ALL for him to bring this clock in a breifcase looking like a bomb into the school
Can you prove those inaccurate?
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Its not about what I believe, that facts are his sister did the same thing, this kid knew this was going to cause controversy and he played games with the police.Can you prove those inaccurate?
The fact is not that his sister did the same thing, the fact is that she was suspended for something. That is not the same.
You are asking me to prove a negative, that's not how it works. You need prove yourself right, which you've not done. I know you think posting someone else's innane blog post filled with assumptions about his guilt somehow proves he did something wrong, but it doesn't.
The fact that there was no project that day proves nothing. Perhaps he was just excited to show people what he had done.