Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
[B]Funny you glossed over the mediocre and abysmal performance of the mods. They were rude, argumentative and straight unprofessional.
Uh, I made a whole separate post on how the mods sucked.
I mean, I haven't seen their horribleness, but even second-hand they sound the worst of the four.
Should I keep going?
No, you illustrated your point 'Time will repeat anything that's anti-Clinton no matter how ridiculous.'
Orgy Island? Really? The 'random website makes something obviously fictional up and Time buys into it because he's an idiot' bait one? That;s the kind of one I'd add to a list to point out the kind of ridiculous stuff you've bought into before.
And the pedophile one, lesse, what was that? Ah yea, they went to parties of someone who invited tons of influential people to parties- including, Iirc, Trump- were not close to the guy, had no idea what he did, and then something like a decade later the truth came out. But 'had casual contact with a pedo unbeknownst to them, a decade before the facts came out' just doesn't sound as damning, does it?
Some of 'em are real but exaggerated and not career-sinking big to state the obvious, some of 'em are obvious lies that you are knowingly spreading because you like lying about Hillary, but none of 'em are what you want them to be.
Now, since we were talking debates, there's only two that came up in 'em:
Benghazi: Republican-lead panel found squat, tried 11 hours of grilling and admitted they failed to find wrongdoing after that, and multiple high-rank Republican people have admitted it's a hatchet job., including a major who quit the panel for that reason. Also? Hillary was never in charge of security, received no requests for more security, and a number of people trying to accuse her of such have been caught out in lying. In the debate, Hillary brushed it off, and then soon after, came out of a full-day live hearing looking good. Because the Republicans, launching investigations that cost tens of millions of dollars, spent all their effort trying to find this horrible thing she did involve Benghazi, and failed to do so.
So, when you've got Republicans both in charge of investigations that fail to find anything, and admitting it's a hatchet job... yea, it's a hatchet job.
E-mails: Not actually near the security breach claimed, not actually made classified or illegal til *after* she quit, messages were to authorized people anyway, and even going through the e-mails, the Republicans have found no smoking gun. The point it came up in the debate was Bernie, pointing out that the e-mails don't matter in comparison to the issues.
So, debate wise, also came out fine.
Look, end of the day, if you have to lie to attack someone's reputation? Then it's your reputation that comes out damaged.
I don't know why you keep on insisting every exaggeration, misrepresentation, and flat-out entirely made up story (Heh, orgy island), must be true. It'd be one thing if you believed some but admitted others were false, but no matter the actual level of evidence, every *has* to be real, true, and horrible and the only reason for not thinking so is liberal bias, even if the Republican party itself can't prove it.
It's like an admission that you don't think the facts are damning.
Though, I guess that really is the reason: You don't trust in the truth to get what you want, so you embrace lie.
You can keep going if you really want, but considering my point was, "Time will pass anything negative against Hillary even if it's known false, he won't admit to anything that doesn't make her look bad," adding more spin-jobs and made up stories just adds to the point, don't you think.