Originally posted by Time-ImmemorialAll 3 sources produce a page not found error
Aw too bad for youhttp://www.judicialwatch.org/press-...effrey-epstein/
Originally posted by Time-ImmemorialAll 3 sources produce a page not found error
Aw too bad for youhttp://www.judicialwatch.org/press-...effrey-epstein/
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
I think you have lost it along the way. The fact that you can even call Hilary honest shows how small your brain is and how easy you can be manipulated, but you are a sheep, not a pig.
The one who fact-checks and searches out third-party confirmation: Me.
(Here, fact-check site. Give it a whirl)
The person who passes off everything he likes without a second thought: You.
See, the stereotype of sheep behavior more fits with your lack-of-checking...
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Aw too bad for you
Yea, all three of those say, in short, "This one person said....". Second hand, no less.
With no evidence or independent confirmation. And they're clickbait sites repeating the same story, from a tabloid, all with the same lack of substance or confirmation.
Why do you think repeating the same obvious fake makes it less fake?
Hello, you are using no critical thinking and are repeating obviously made-up trasj.
This is what I mean. You're so willing to swallow anything anti-Clinton that you're lying in a very obvious fashion.
Originally posted by Q99
The one who fact-checks and searches out third-party confirmation: Me.(Here, fact-check site. Give it a whirl)
The person who passes off everything he likes without a second thought: You.
See, the stereotype of sheep behavior more fits with your lack-of-checking...
Yea, all three of those say, in short, "This one person said....". Third hand, no less.
With no evidence or independent confirmation. And they're clickbait sites repeating the same story, all with the same lack of substance or confirmation.
Why do you think repeating the same obvious fake makes it less fake?
Hello, you are using no critical thinking and are repeating obviously made-up trasj.
This is what I mean. You're so willing to swallow anything anti-Clinton that you're lying in a very obvious fashion.
And you are so willing to to ignore everything, what are we even talking about, you are so full of the Clintons they could kill your grandmother and you would still vote for them.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
And you are so willing to to ignore everything, what are we even talking about, you are so full of the Clintons they could kill your grandmother and you would still vote for them.
"Ignore everything?"
You are posting a literal tabloid story- not figurative tabloid, literal one- that has no evidence in it to begin with, and two places repeating the tabloid story, and that's 'ignoring everything' 😆
See, this is what I mean. Because it's anti-Clinton, it must be true and my taking the slightest credulousness to anything anti-Clinton must 'obviously' mean I'm slavishly following every last thing they say- even though you're literally the one ignoring evidence on so many of their stories like the actual results of investigations with Benghazi and the e-mails.
I mean, just how hollow your argument is! It is literally a tabloid printing second-hand hearsay and we're all horrible for not buying into it 😄 This is hilarious!
Could it be that I'm overly harsh on calling you a liar, and just underestimating how gullible you are?
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
So this didn't happen and you seem to be hypocritical because you rant and whine and come apart here daily.All Cruz did was point out the obvious, which the crowd picked up on.
Run along now Rob, let the adults talk.
You seem mightily defensive over me commenting on Cruz's rant. Very odd, but calm down.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
So lets see here, what about what Hilary said in her awful debate trumps what Trump or Rubio or Christie said?I bet you cant even name two things. You are not a critical thinker and you just want Hilary to win, but you don't know why. Its kind of sad actually.
Be your own man.
This response of yours is EXTREMELY weird. I point out that if 5-6 don't drop out soon, it will harm the final few, which is true, as the Iowa caucus is approaching and no one can really shine when you have eleven candidates. You respond with a bunch of non sequitur anger and personal attacks. Tell me, are you having another bad moment or something?
Originally posted by Q99
"Ignore everything?"You are posting a literal tabloid story- not figurative tabloid, literal one- that has no evidence in it to begin with, and two places repeating the tabloid story, and that's 'ignoring everything' 😆
See, this is what I mean. Because it's anti-Clinton, it must be true and my taking the slightest credulousness to anything anti-Clinton must 'obviously' mean I'm slavishly following every last thing they say- even though you're literally the one ignoring evidence on so many of their stories like the actual results of investigations with Benghazi and the e-mails.
I mean, just how hollow your argument is! It is literally a tabloid printing second-hand hearsay and we're all horrible for not buying into it 😄 This is hilarious!
Could it be that I'm overly harsh on calling you a liar, and just underestimating how gullible you are?
Oh and were you not the guy saying Trumped raped his life from the tabloids?
Hypocrite.
Originally posted by Robtard
You seem mightily defensive over me commenting on Cruz's rant. Very odd, but calm down.This response of yours is EXTREMELY weird. I point out that if 5-6 don't drop out soon, it will harm the final few, which is true, as the Iowa caucus is approaching and no one can really shine when you have eleven candidates. You respond with a bunch of non sequitur anger and personal attacks. Tell me, are you having another bad moment or something?
So Cruz speaking the truth is a rant now? So basically you are mad he called them out, and you crying about it.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
So Cruz speaking the truth is a rant now? So basically you are mad he called them out, and you crying about it.
He embarrassed himself, actually. He was asked a legitimate question and instead of answering, he went on a minute long tirade about blaming the media. Seemed to be the norm in yesterday's debate, can't answer a question = shift on the media. Yes, "you mad". Another good retort.
Anyhow, what the hell was your rant about me pointing out the obvious concerning the eleven candidates and no one dropping out?
Originally posted by Robtard
He embarrassed himself, actually. He was asked a legitimate question and instead of answering, he went on a minute long tirade about blaming the media. Seemed to be the norm in yesterday's debate, can't answer a question = shift on the media. Yes, "you mad". Another good retort.Anyhow, what the hell was your rant about me pointing out the obvious concerning the eleven candidates and no one dropping out?
Ok, not only did he call them out, but so did everyone else, so you are wrong. And since you can't recognize the mod's being complete asshats, I see why your political beliefs are bogus.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Ok, not only did he call them out, but so did everyone else, so you are wrong. And since you can't recognize the mod's being complete asshats, I see why your political beliefs are bogus.
Except of course the mods were not being "asshats", they basically kowtowed to the more aggressive candidates and let themselves be bullied into submission for the most of the debate. The candidates ran that debate. Seriously, what did you watch?
I take it you're not going to answer about your weird attack rant. Oh well.
Originally posted by Robtard
Except of course the mods were not being "asshats", they basically kowtowed to the more aggressive candidates and let themselves be bullied into submission for the most of the debate. Seriously, what did you watch?
I can tell you didn't watch the debate, Im not going to talk to you anymore about it. Even Q99 acknowledged they were out of line.
Originally posted by RobtardJust because his opinion differs from yours that doesn't mean he didn't watch it. Respect a difference of opinion do not attack it.
Except of course the mods were not being "asshats", they basically kowtowed to the more aggressive candidates and let themselves be bullied into submission for the most of the debate. Seriously, what did you watch?I take it you're not going to answer about your weird attack rant. Oh well.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Its like you didn't even watch it, or the coverage after, CNN this morning was saying how out of line the mods were.So am I supposed to believe your false idea that what happened didn't actually happen?
No, you're welcome to not agree with my assessment, the personal attacks are uncalled for.