Originally posted by Star428
LOL. Apparently you missed my post where I said that a person appointed as Secretary of the Army who is gay concerns me when you take into account what else Obama has done. Gay people have low morals as I've already mentioned. I don't want someone like that in charge of our army because any oath he took to protect the American people probably means very little to someone like him.
I'm not going to respond to the content of this, as I doubt I'd still be a mod afterwards.
...So do you have anything related to his actual performance that says he shouldn't be Secretary of the Army?
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Hilary started the birthers and Bill called Obama a thug from Chicago.Nuff said
One of Hillary's people mistakenly thought picking up an attack that one of Obama's democrat opponents in his senate race has used, and neither Clinton decided sticking with that was remotely wise or reasonable. They've also, clearly reconciled what differences they had.
I don't know why you think that excuses/erasing a large group picking up on it, running with it, having candidates publicly endorse it, and over a third of the party believing it.
Originally posted by Star428
Oh yeah, I left out a very important one. He also weakens us by making friends and bad deals with our longtime enemies (Iran and Cuba) while turning his back on our longtime allies (Israel); he also does it when he gives up 4 or 5 terrorists for 1 traitor.
Cuba? I don't see a narrative in which blocking Cuba from the last ten years or so makes much sense.
Originally posted by Star428
My point is that Cuba has always been our enemy in the same way Iran always has. Although it's true that Cuba doesn't hate us as much as Iran does, of course.
I don't see changing policies with historical enemies as necessarily a bad thing, for obvious reasons. Which doesn't mean I think it's something self-evident nor riskfree, I understand the wariness towards Iran.