The Pope Bows to Obama

Started by Bardock426 pages
Originally posted by psmith81992
I don't know where TI gets his material but he needs to work on it. First I was a democrat now I'm catholic. For the millionth time, I'm a conservative/republican Jew.

Yeah, but that's exactly what you'd say if you were a Catholic liberal democrat, isn't it?

Originally posted by Bardock42
Yeah, but that's exactly what you'd say if you were a Catholic liberal democrat, isn't it?

What the **** is wrong with those two? (Star and TI, not Obama and the Pope)

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
I noticed no one cares when he said transgendered are like nuclear weapons.

I am personally glad the pope has decided to address the horrors radiation can cause. I know I see a trans-gender person and think "just being near you is quite literally lethal to me good sir/madam/however you self identify".

Originally posted by Emperordmb
What the **** is wrong with those two? (Star and TI, not Obama and the Pope)

We're actually awake and know a little bit about what the Bible says about a "one-world government". Unlike people like you who walk around with their head in the sand.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
See why you have to put this moron on ignore?

I noticed the photo he posted along with his entire post is gone. I didn't realize a person (except for a mod) could remove an entire post and make it seem like he never posted.

Ush removed it.

For all the people ignorant of what bible says about "one-world government":

http://www.endtime.com/new-world-order/

http://www.gotquestions.org/one-world-government.html

The Bible never actually says the words"one-world government" but to anyone who understands even just a little bit about bible prophecy it's clear that's what it's talking about. Anyone who denies this is either ignorant or, like the pope, trying to intentionally deceive people.

Then again the bible just plain has a lot of stupid shit in it.

Just because the Bible says the Anti-Christ would rule all nations as a one-world government doesn't inherently make any one-world government bad. If some evil dude takes over the world, obviously he's going to do so in a government that spans the entire world. This doesn't make any one-world government inherently evil however.

Also, if any dumbass actually thinks that the Pope is the Anti-Christ, there are numerous other reasons why this idea is retarded, but he won't live long enough for such a shift in government to even happen, so he can hardly be the Anti-Christ that rules some evil one-world government, as it's simply not something that can take place in the rest of his lifespan.

Even taking everything Star provided at face value, it still doesn't mean nearly what he's trying to imply it means.

It'd be awesome if the pope WAS the anti-Christ because then we could literally send an infant to kill the anti-Christ if need be. Or just like a strong gust of wind really.

It would also mean the anti-Christ was hilariously inept at his job. I mean as far as crimes against humanity..Miley Cyrus has probably done more damage.

Originally posted by Surtur
It'd be awesome if the pope WAS the anti-Christ because then we could literally send an infant to kill the anti-Christ if need be. Or just like a strong gust of wind really.
Obama will save us.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
He did just compare transgender people to nuclear weapons, but that's one blackmark against lots of gold stars so I'll let it slide...sort of.
i agree

as someone who is a big fan of nuclear weapons i was very offended by the comparison. you couldn't even blow up a small village using a transgender person... compared to nukes they're just about useless.

i suppose technically a trans person could be the one firing the nukes... but then again they'd probably just get us preemptively nuked by some other country by issuing a trigger warning before pressing the button.

Originally posted by Surtur
It'd be awesome if the pope WAS the anti-Christ because then we could literally send an infant to kill the anti-Christ if need be. Or just like a strong gust of wind really.

It would also mean the anti-Christ was hilariously inept at his job. I mean as far as crimes against humanity..Miley Cyrus has probably done more damage.

how would an infant murder a grown man?

or do you mean you'd infect the infant with aids and then sell him to pope as a sex slave?

Originally posted by red g jacks
i suppose technically a trans person could be the one firing the nukes... but then again they'd probably just get us preemptively nuked by some other country by issuing a trigger warning before pressing the button.
lol 👆

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Just because the Bible says the Anti-Christ would rule all nations as a one-world government doesn't inherently make any one-world government bad. If some evil dude takes over the world, obviously he's going to do so in a government that spans the entire world. This doesn't make any one-world government inherently evil however.

Also, if any dumbass actually thinks that the Pope is the Anti-Christ, there are numerous other reasons why this idea is retarded, but he won't live long enough for such a shift in government to even happen, so he can hardly be the Anti-Christ that rules some evil one-world government, as it's simply not something that can take place in the rest of his lifespan.

Even taking everything Star provided at face value, it still doesn't mean nearly what he's trying to imply it means.

Also, one of the defining features of the False Prophet/Anti-Christ, is not believing in Christ. And overtly speaking against God.

Daniel 7:25 “He shall speak pompous words against the Most High, shall persecute the saints of the Most High, and shall intend to change times and law. Then the saints shall be given into his hand for a time and times and half a time.”

That fits no Popes- even Popes one doesn't like. It also fits no US Presidents, living or dead, who are all professed Christians.

does it fit marx?

Originally posted by red g jacks
does it fit marx?

Yeah, but I think he has the being dead issue, so it's probably not him either

Mm, arguable. He did say religion is the opiate of the masses, but is that pompous? I'd expect something a lot more self-inflating and directly against god specifically.

Originally posted by red g jacks
does it fit marx?

He wasn't much of a powerful man during his lifetime.