Pope meets Kim Davis

Started by Bashar Teg4 pages

Vatican said nothing about it being over homosexuality.

onsignor Kryzstof Charamsa announced this weekend that he is gay and in a relationship with another man. Charamsa, who is Polish, told reporters he is happy and proud to be gay.

If his partner was a woman it all would have applied. This reeks of media spin horseshit and some unethical priest trying to blackmail and smear his boss in the name of progressive activism.

So it's strictly over being in a relationship? If that was the only reason why were they bringing up the timing of the announcement and how it was done before an event, as if that made what he did especially bad?

No. The priest dictated the timing with his own announcement and got fired. There seems to be no evidence that the vatican had a specifically anti homosexual agenda here, yet every media outlet just ran with it.

I never said the priest didn't dictate the timing, rather just that the timing was brought up as a reason what he did was wrong.

Just because it was mentioned does not make it the reason. Catholic priests are not allowed in an intimate relationship, he went public breaking the rules, and he got canned. Its a non story on maximum spin cycle

👆