Bibi just Honeybadgered the UN

Started by Star4286 pages

LOL. He's not losing it. I guess you're another one of those who have a clear hatred of Israel. I bet you think the Iran deal was a good one too, huh? LOL. Anything that increases the chance that Israel will be wiped-off the map you and your pathetic liberal kind are all for. Now go ahead and threaten me with a ban because I told the truth. LMAO.

He sure is. He's resorted to name calling and spamming phony reports to try and kill the discussion because he has nothing of value to say, much like yourself.

I'm not in favor of any nation being wiped off the map. Are you?

And who keeps shooting the rockets into Palestine, actually killing people? Who stops humanitarian aid from reaching these Ghettos? Who has refused for years to negotiate without excessive conditions? Who is working against Palestine even getting a voice in the UN at all?

Who keeps shooting ketusha rockets into Israel? Who keeps massacring their own citizens? Who keeps using women and children as shields? It's telling that you desperately want to tell one side of the story. Also, I don't know why you keep mentioning a two state solution.

https://electronicintifada.net/content/survey-70-percent-palestinians-support-one-state-solution/6773

http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.601938

http://nypost.com/2015/03/20/who-wants-a-two-state-solution-anyway/

Let me know when Palestinians want anything other than Israel's destruction.

Originally posted by psmith81992
Who keeps shooting ketusha rockets into Israel? Who keeps massacring their own citizens? Who keeps using women and children as shields? It's telling that you desperately want to tell one side of the story. Also, I don't know why you keep mentioning a two state solution.

https://electronicintifada.net/content/survey-70-percent-palestinians-support-one-state-solution/6773

http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.601938

http://nypost.com/2015/03/20/who-wants-a-two-state-solution-anyway/

Let me know when Palestinians want anything other than Israel's destruction.

The problem is that Israel is the big, US funded, bully. It's always easy to ask the oppressed, weak people to play by the rules, but really, it's understandable why they use whatever they have at their disposal. It doesn't excuse that kind of behaviour, but to pretend that there is equal blame, or worse, like TI and Star, that Palestine is solely to blame is wrong.

OH, so because Israel is being funded by the U.S. it automatically means that they're in the wrong and they have no right to defend themselves or be proactive in defending themselves. 🙄

That's typical retarded liberal logic for ya I guess. LOL.

Originally posted by Star428
OH, so because Israel is being funded by the U.S. it automatically means that they're in the wrong and they have no right to defend themselves or be proactive in defending themselves. 🙄

That's liberal logic for ya I guess. LOL.

No, it means that they have to act like a first world country, rather than a military regime bent on human rights violations.

The problem is that Israel is the big, US funded, bully. It's always easy to ask the oppressed, weak people to play by the rules, but really, it's understandable why they use whatever they have at their disposal. It doesn't excuse that kind of behaviour, but to pretend that there is equal blame, or worse, like TI and Star, that Palestine is solely to blame is wrong.

See, you're calling it a bully because it's bigger, and you're using double standards here. If we're going by who started it, and who has committed more atrocities, the Palestinians win out. You can say Israel needs to be held to a higher standard because they are bigger but to say they deserve more blame than the Palestinians is also wrong.

No, it means that they have to act like a first world country, rather than a military regime bent on human rights violations.

You REALLY want to compare who has been responsible for more human rights violations?

Originally posted by psmith81992
See, you're calling it a bully because it's bigger, and you're using double standards here. If we're going by who started it, and who has committed more atrocities, the Palestinians win out. You can say Israel needs to be held to a higher standard because they are bigger but to say they deserve more blame than the Palestinians is also wrong.

I suppose we can argue about what happened 60 years ago, the Islamic countries did behave extremely badly then, I totally agree. But if we talk about the Palestinian people, if we talk about the last couple decades, they've been kept down by Israel in extremely poor conditions. If we were in the 60s sure, but at some point, 3 generations down, people have suffered enough for mistakes they may or may not have even done.

Originally posted by psmith81992

You REALLY want to compare who has been responsible for more human rights violations?

Are you saying Palestine has been responsible for more or are you referring to my countries past (only asking cause it's been a theme lately)?

Pound for pound yes. Now i will agree that israel definitely needs to tone it down as being the bigger opponent.

Originally posted by BackFire
Stop spamming bogus reports simply because you are frustrated that you're losing an argument. Bardock said nothing wrong in that post.

In fact, the only thing against the rules in that post is his quote from you, calling him a name.

I reported him once or twice, I don't consider that spamming.

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/wap/Item.aspx?type=0&item=201369

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
You are anti semitic and a biggot.

It says right in the article what I was talking about, you are being a moron and a biggot.

"I am prepared to immediately resume direct peace negotiations with the Palestinian Authority without any preconditions whatsoever," Netanyahu said in a speech before the U.N. General Assembly on Thursday.

"Unfortunately, President Abbas said yesterday that he is not prepared to do this," he said Thursday. "Well, I hope he changes his mind, because I remain committed to a vision of two states, two peoples in which a demilitarized Palestinian state recognizes the Jewish state."


Disapproving of Israeli policy is not antisemitism, and it's incredibly poor form to conflate the two.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Disapproving of Israeli policy is not antisemitism, and it's incredibly poor form to conflate the two.

And yet its always RACISIM that is the cause for when people disagree with Prez Oboomba.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]And yet its always RACISIM that is the cause for when people disagree with Prez Oboomba. [/B]

👆

....or "sexism" when they disagree with Hillary (LOL).

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]And yet its always RACISIM that is the cause for when people disagree with Prez Oboomba. [/B]

I don't think I've ever accused anyone here of racism just for disapproving of Obama.

Try a little harder

Marco Rubio makes it crystal clear how he feels about Israel:

https://twitter.com/marcorubio/status/651747248192094210

Rubio is a good man.