Originally posted by Bardock42
It's interesting how they couldn't help themselves making it about the shooter in the second part again. At any rate, it's great to read about heroes in these situations, and glad he survived being shot 7 times, that's crazy.
Guy's a beast surviving that. Pic reminds me a little of BF.
Originally posted by SurturWho knows if they will or won't... Like you said it's hard to know if they would even have been able to stop the shooter and I highly doubt they would have been able to stop the shooter before they had killed at least 2-3 people.
I wonder if they'll change their mind about having an armed guard now?
Originally posted by Star428
You know, psmith, I refrained from putting you on ignore when you trolled me in the religion forum concerning the pope recently despite TI's insistence that I should. But now, I see his point and I don't think you're actually a conservative, either. Otherwise, you wouldn't have a hard-on for Obama's muslim-loving ass. This is the last we'll ever talk. Shame too.You're on ignore.
Yes we all get it, you're stupid. Anyone who disagrees with you has a hard on for Obama's "muslim loving ass", and isn't just arguing rationally regardless of political leanings..
I did find this comment by someone about the armed guard interesting:
"When I need to answer a plumbing question, I call a plumber. When I have a wiring question, I call an electrician. But.. when a liberal has a gun question, they propose answers based on their own stunning lack of knowledge on the subject instead of asking a gun expert. This is what comes of it. Exceptionally poor reasoning based on their liberal narratives rather than facts. Had they asked a gun expert, he/she would have quickly dispelled all of the incorrect points in their thesis and recommended they implement an armed guard."
Do people think this comment is correct?
Originally posted by SurturI don't think that's comparable. Plumbers being asked about plumbing related stuff isn't threatining their job (or in many gun experts cases, hobbies) as the final result.
I did find this comment by someone about the armed guard interesting:"When I need to answer a plumbing question, I call a plumber. When I have a wiring question, I call an electrician. But.. when a liberal has a gun question, they propose answers based on their own stunning lack of knowledge on the subject instead of asking a gun expert. This is what comes of it. Exceptionally poor reasoning based on their liberal narratives rather than facts. Had they asked a gun expert, he/she would have quickly dispelled all of the incorrect points in their thesis and recommended they implement an armed guard."
Do people think this comment is correct?
Originally posted by Surtur
I did find this comment by someone about the armed guard interesting:"When I need to answer a plumbing question, I call a plumber. When I have a wiring question, I call an electrician. But.. when a liberal has a gun question, they propose answers based on their own stunning lack of knowledge on the subject instead of asking a gun expert. This is what comes of it. Exceptionally poor reasoning based on their liberal narratives rather than facts. Had they asked a gun expert, he/she would have quickly dispelled all of the incorrect points in their thesis and recommended they implement an armed guard."
Do people think this comment is correct?
True, they view the NRA or anyone who knows anything about guns as gun nuts. The only reason we have America is because of guns and people standing up and using them.
Originally posted by Parmaniac
I don't think that's comparable. Plumbers being asked about plumbing related stuff isn't threatining their job (or in many gun experts cases, hobbies) as the final result.
Okay, but don't you think they should of consulted an expert on guns or armed guards when making this decision? Since if these people really have no idea what they are talking about it would be impossible for them to make an informed decision.
Originally posted by Surtur
I did find this comment by someone about the armed guard interesting:"When I need to answer a plumbing question, I call a plumber. When I have a wiring question, I call an electrician. But.. when a liberal has a gun question, they propose answers based on their own stunning lack of knowledge on the subject instead of asking a gun expert. This is what comes of it. Exceptionally poor reasoning based on their liberal narratives rather than facts. Had they asked a gun expert, he/she would have quickly dispelled all of the incorrect points in their thesis and recommended they implement an armed guard."
Do people think this comment is correct?
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it!"
Originally posted by SurturActually I'd like to have a conversation like this with lots of "experts" from all different types of areas like gun lobby, schools, police officers etc. backed by actual numbers/statistics etc.
Okay, but don't you think they should of consulted an expert on guns or armed guards when making this decision? Since if these people really have no idea what they are talking about it would be impossible for them to make an informed decision.
And not retarded shit like you're 100% pro guns and attack every thought of regulation or 100% con guns and want to ban absolutely everything.
Originally posted by Surtur
I did find this comment by someone about the armed guard interesting:"When I need to answer a plumbing question, I call a plumber. When I have a wiring question, I call an electrician. But.. when a liberal has a gun question, they propose answers based on their own stunning lack of knowledge on the subject instead of asking a gun expert. This is what comes of it. Exceptionally poor reasoning based on their liberal narratives rather than facts. Had they asked a gun expert, he/she would have quickly dispelled all of the incorrect points in their thesis and recommended they implement an armed guard."
Do people think this comment is correct?
I'm not sure why you would ask a "gun expert", it seems the question posed could best be answered by an expert in security.
So it seems like that was just another angry poorly thought out rant at "liberals".
Originally posted by SurturMy issue with this comment is that it assumes a liberal does not or can not have gun knowledge or that a gun expert can not have liberal views on the subject of gun ownership or gun safety.
I did find this comment by someone about the armed guard interesting:"When I need to answer a plumbing question, I call a plumber. When I have a wiring question, I call an electrician. But.. when a liberal has a gun question, they propose answers based on their own stunning lack of knowledge on the subject instead of asking a gun expert. This is what comes of it. Exceptionally poor reasoning based on their liberal narratives rather than facts. Had they asked a gun expert, he/she would have quickly dispelled all of the incorrect points in their thesis and recommended they implement an armed guard."
Do people think this comment is correct?
I was raised around guns all my life. I've fired gun, been given guns, taught the rules of responsible gun ownership by my father who is an army vet.
But I also realize that simply having an armed guard does not negate the possibility of these events happenings.
Also gun facts often don't support what extreme conservative gun owners want it to... that more guns equals more safety. We often find the opposite to be true. England, Australia, states with higher gun controls laws tend to have lower crime rates involving firearms.
This comment to me screams of a politically biased person trying to push off their agenda as expertise.