Poll
35%
65%
Originally posted by TheLordofMurderactually I gave a lower bound ratio. The supremum is unknown. Diana is several orders faster and more responsive than Morg in combat. Thus she can hit him more than 3 times, on average, for every 1 time he hits her. Being significantly more skilled will add more than a hit to the ratio.
What quantifiable equation lead to those ratios?
Originally posted by h1a8
actually I gave a lower bound ratio. The supremum is unknown. Diana is several orders faster and more responsive than Morg in combat. Thus she can hit him more than 3 times, on average, for every 1 time he hits her. Being significantly more skilled will add more than a hit to the ratio.
Post your formula...
As well as the feats that support your numbers...
Originally posted by Star428yet you can't defeat my argument.
Agreed. WW is the most seriously overrated character on this forum. Morg 10/10.
C1. She will hit him far more times than he hits her.
C2. She can lasso him at any time for the win.
C2 gives her the majority by itself.
Originally posted by StoicNow I understand. You are using faulty ABC logic. Morg has no defense against being lassoed. That tactic alone gives her the majority. Am I right?
Morg destroys her. There is no way that WW could have all of those Heralds running for their lives. She'd have her hands full with Frankie Raye alone never mind the guy that killed her, and lol at the thought of any herald of Galactus being slow or having slow reaction speeds.