Lol Dooku's accomlishments as a duelist are well known. What has Revan ever done with a saber that even suggests he is comparable? You do realize that its the pretender that needs to show his worth. In other words, should I make arguments that Dooku can defeat Starkiller in a duel or is Starkiller a much less renowned duelist that needs to show his worth. Same with Revan.
I understand a lot of people really really like Revan but they need to grasp the reality that he's not a duelist that can defeat Maul or Kenobi for a majority in a sabers fight, no matter people in Dooku's league
GG. 👆
Originally posted by XSUPREMEXSKILLZThis is exactly the same way he'd debate on the movie versus. He wouldn't debate but would troll just like he's doing here.
Even S66 would admit he didn't humiliate Ant, lol. Your refusal to argue that Dooku>Revan is what's up, here. Nobody cares how "entitled" or "worthy" Dooku is, lmfao. If you can't argue Dooku being Revan's superior in sabers, why would someone like Ant care about Kenobi?
Pi
Originally posted by XSUPREMEXSKILLZ
Even S66 would admit he didn't humiliate Ant, lol. Your refusal to argue that Dooku>Revan is what's up, here. Nobody cares how "entitled" or "worthy" Dooku is, lmfao. If you can't argue Dooku being Revan's superior in sabers, why would someone like Ant care about Kenobi?
Lol "worthy" might not be the best choice of words. Yet, Dooku's dueling accomplishments are well established while Revan's are almost a mystery..
From what I've seen I don't even think Revan can defeat someone like Kenobi in a duel.
So, to paraphrase you, why would I even care debating Dooku vs. Revan, when Kenobi takes Revan down in a duel.
Inability to grasp this shows how much Revan wank clouded your vision.(and not only yours, but all SWTORians, of course)