Originally posted by Darth ThorNo, it isn't. We see Maul operating much faster against Sidious in clone wars and look more impressive than Luke who was awful in esb. He lacked training.
Luke's super fast leap in ESB is faster than anything we've seen from Maul.So ESB Luke > Maul. And Vader battered ESB Luke.
Therefore Vader >> Maul.
Abc logic does not compute. Maul crushes esb Luke and beats Vader into the dirt. He's too slow.
😂
Originally posted by quanchi112
No, it isn't. We see Maul operating much faster against Sidious in clone wars and look more impressive than Luke who was awful in esb. He lacked training.Abc logic does not compute. Maul crushes esb Luke and beats Vader into the dirt. He's too slow.
😂
And so the double standards continue.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2?
And so the double standards continue.
Originally posted by Darth ThorNot than Maul's attacks which are more relevant to combat than leaping ability. We also see Luke easily dumbfounded as to how to react to the very slow tk attack employed by Darth Vader.
No we didn't.@ 1:55
?v=C-DeI3ohVbY
Luke's leap was still faster.
The acceleration in that straight up vertical leap was amazing
Nice try though.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Not at all. We see Luke can't even mount a defense against Vader's tk defense and the film make it clear that Luke isn't even ready or finished with his training.
Maul also has no defence against Vader's TK either.
Vader crushes a frigging AT-AT. So yeah he'll defo Tk crush TCW Maul same as Sidious did.
Originally posted by Rebel95There isn't any if Maul is faster. The evidence from the films definitely proves it. Nah. Maul took on his master who was far more powerful than Vader ever was and had better feats. Maul wins.
The two aren't even comparable. And even if Maul was faster, Vader's strength, force and TK skills far outclass Maul's, it's not even close.
Originally posted by Darth ThorYes, he does with his own tk.
Maul also has no defence against Vader's TK either.Vader crushes a frigging AT-AT. So yeah he'll defo Tk crush TCW Maul same as Sidious did.
So destroying an at at somehow means what to Maul ? Look at his Maul's feat while being fired at from multiple angles and directions in clone wars. Much quicker while under duress. Vader wasn't under the same duress and we see many words spoken showing it took a while. Maul's feat was amazing while under the duress of combat.
Sidious didn't force kill Maul and he's superior to Vader.
Originally posted by quanchi112
There isn't any if Maul is faster. The evidence from the films definitely proves it. Nah. Maul took on his master who was far more powerful than Vader ever was and had better feats. Maul wins.