Kyle Katarn vs. ROTJ Luke Skywalker

Started by carthage2 pages

Kyle Katarn vs. ROTJ Luke Skywalker

Kyle as of Fury

Force, sabers, all out

Luke crushes him instantly.

Luke for 'Sabers, and all-out. I'm pretty torn on the Force, though. Luke has more raw power and intrinsic aptitude - but Katarn has a wider range of Force abilities to draw upon such Force Lightning, and Darkshear.

What are his lightning feats?

Prolly killing Stormtroopers and shit.

Originally posted by Deronn_solo
Luke for 'Sabers, and all-out. I'm pretty torn on the Force, though. Luke has more raw power and intrinsic aptitude - but Katarn has a wider range of Force abilities to draw upon such Force Lightning, and Darkshear.
ROTJ Luke was Vaders most powerful opponent in every aspect.

LAL@ Luke being more powerful than Galen and Starkiller. Luke could barely hold up an AT-ST; Starkiller was busting frigates and Galen was redirecting the descent of a falling Imperial Star Destroyer.

Skywalker frankly, doesn't compare. 😬

Originally posted by Deronn_solo
LAL@ Luke being more powerful than Galen and Starkiller. Luke could barely hold up an AT-ST; Starkiller was busting frigates and Galen was redirecting the descent of a falling Imperial Star Destroyer.

Skywalker frankly, doesn't compare. 😬

Implying that Force Unleashed was canon is stupid.

It is for Legends....which is the versions we're using. 😬

Don't get into, DC; you'll regret it.

Originally posted by Deronn_solo
It is for Legends....which is the versions we're using. 😬
The Force Unleashed isn't part of the timeline. Jaden and Kyle Katarn are, thats how it was before Disney bought the license, thats how it is now.

Proof Disney retconned TFU from Legends canon, pls.

Originally posted by Deronn_solo
Proof Disney retconned TFU from Legends canon, pls.
The movies themselves are canon.

Movies 1-6 are STILL canon.

TFU was never, ever canon, and just because Legends are also not canon, does not mean TFU is now canon to Legends.

I do agree that Galen Marek is more powerful then Luke Skywalker as of ROTJ though.

Proof TFU was never, ever canon pls. 'Cause by simply opening up a Star Wars novel, and viewing the timeline you can see it's listed in the continuity.

Originally posted by Deronn_solo
Proof TFU was never, ever canon pls. 'Cause by simply opening up a Star Wars novel, and viewing the timeline you can see it's listed in the continuity.
Because it completely contradicts the movies.

Vader never had an apprentice, Vader was never defeated by his imaginary non-canon apprentice.

Kind of like how Vader leading and training a bunch of Inquisitors contradicts the movies. 👆...No wait, neither of those things do that at all.

Hmm, so using your logic, Ahsoka isn't canon either? 'Cause I don't recall Anakin having an apprentice/padawan, or Tano being in the movies, or even mentioned there either.

Of course, this is just one of the flaws in your logic.

Originally posted by FreshestSlice
Kind of like how Vader leading and training a bunch of Inquisitors contradicts the movies. 👆...No wait, neither of those things do that at all.
Except in TFU, Marek is literally the inspiration for the Rebel Alliance :/.

No, scratch that, he is the founder, and the inspiration for the Rebel Alliance, that contradicts the movies because he is never mentioned.

What about the Starkiller clone? Should he be canon too? Because, y'know, Vader getting captured and such, bunch of Starkiller clones. Luke near the middle of TFU should already have been off on his adventure with Ben Kenobi and such.

OH, what about him? Why isn't Ben Kenobi mentioned? Or Yoda? Why only Rahm Kota?

Also, Vader himself says that Luke as of ESB was the greatest opponent he'd ever faced.