Originally posted by Deronn_soloShes canon because shes in Rebels.
Hmm, so using your logic, Ahsoka isn't canon either? 'Cause I don't recall Anakin having an apprentice/padawan, or Tano being in the movies, or even mentioned there either.Of course, this is just one of the flaws in your logic.
But TFU is a different timeline.
con·tra·dict
ˌkäntrəˈdikt/Submit
verb
1. deny the truth of (a statement), especially by asserting the opposite.
2. assert the opposite of a statement made by (someone).
3. be in conflict with.
Go ahead and show me which definition of contradict you're actually using, and I'll be here to laugh at how retarded you're being. By the way, not being mentioned doesn't correlate with any of those definitions.
Except you completely ignored practically all my other points in that argument, dumbass.
It's in conflict with that because it's literally impossible Vader was dealing with Luke and Starkiller at the same time, one is conflicted with the other, no matter how you look at it.
Luke was part of the Rebel Alliance. The Rebel Alliance had already been around a very long time.
TFU is like, what, 19 years into the Life of Darth Vader as a sith lord.
Luke was 19-20 at the most when he went off on his journey, so thats all fine and dandy. That means that TFU being canon is possible, right?
Wrong, Luke would've been TFU II if that were the case, if TFU is canon, so is TFU II, its also safe to assume that its been a year AT LEAST since the events of TFU.
Starkiller, in his own story, is essentially Luke.
Luke would've heard about Vader getting captured by some random Starkiller clone, and taken to a Rebel Base.
So why didn't he?
Because Starkiller is basically Luke in his timeline.
Guarantee you if they one day release a Force Unleashed 3, it will be about taking down The Emperor.
Except Luke and Leia both exist in TFU as Luke and Leia the children of Anakin Skywalker.
Originally posted by Jmanghan
Except you completely ignored practically all my other points in that argument, dumbass.
It's in conflict with that because it's literally impossible Vader was dealing with Luke and Starkiller at the same time, one is conflicted with the other, no matter how you look at it.
Luke was part of the Rebel Alliance. The Rebel Alliance had already been around a very long time.
TFU is like, what, 19 years into the Life of Darth Vader as a sith lord.Luke was 19-20 at the most when he went off on his journey, so thats all fine and dandy. That means that TFU being canon is possible, right?
Wrong, Luke would've been TFU II if that were the case, if TFU is canon, so is TFU II, its also safe to assume that its been a year AT LEAST since the events of TFU.
Now, if you have any more retarded points to bring up without at least having the decency to use Wookieepedia and Google, I'll get to them tomorrow.