Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
And your are just full of excuses and you lie about everything.
Ah yes, 'excuses' like 'the evidence really, actually doesn't exist, as confirmed by even the person's enemies.' The definition of 'sufficient evidence' is not 'agrees with your preconceived viewpoint.'
And you've actually been caught in repeating known-lies often (tell me, does Orgy Island still exist?), so.... I take your accusations of me lying with a giant grain of salt, since 'lie' in your book seems to be 'something that disagrees with your preconceived viewpoint,' not the traditional definition.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Like I said before, Hilary and Obama could murder these peoples parents and they would find and excuse for them. They don't break ranks.
Originally posted by Star428
Yeah, and then they would try to shift the blame onto Republicans for their deaths. LOL.
You two continue to pat yourselves on the back on being 'right' on Benghazi and how everyone else not being in the tank against Hillary for it is a sign that we'll write off anything they do.
... despite Republican probes finding squat, and no evidence suggesting her actions were responsible for the deaths even with 17 months and over ten million dollars of trying.
So, do you think the Republicans are incompetent, covering for Hillary, or what?
How do you square your sure-ness with the lack of evidence?
"Well, it's a bad accusation, and it's Hillary, so of course it's true," seems to be your entire thought process here.
Well if they want to talk about fairness and stuff and are upset with questions they get asked..how about we let the actual people they'll be serving ask the questions? No, I don't mean people who mod the things or work for networks, but the normal folk. Let them send in questions to ask the candidates.
The people should dictate which things are important, not the politicians.
Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Yes Star remember. You can only insult people on the Republicans side. Its the only fair thing to do. [/B]
Well, I think it's fair to say that no one needs to insult the dumbasscrats because they do that well enough since they're always making fools out themselves just like those lib mods did the other night.👆
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
We already went over this, she lied to the families, there is no denying this.
Except, one, that's not what you've accused her of, two, the Republicans have been lying to the public and the families for over a year on the exact same topic and you seem fine with that, and three, it was people under her, and it really does seem to be a case of crossed wires, because Republican commissions have spent 17 months failing to find purposeful deception.
Mind shutting up now?
Mind getting your facts straight and stop repeating known-lies?
You keep on insisting something must be true and everyone who disagrees must have unlimited bias that'll apply to anything no matter how heinous, but then when the actual known-facts of the situation are brought up, you either deflect or run to Star for assurances (or Star doing the same to you), as if Star's word mattered more than what investigations have actually shown.
Again, I'm not even taking Hillary or Democrat's word on this, I'm taking what a Republican investigation has uncovered, or rather, not uncovered. You seem to be unable to not blame Democrats even when it's your own side that has handled the investigations.
Originally posted by Surtur
Lets just agree both CNN and Fox are both shit. They are definitely two different manners of turds, but turds nonetheless.
Eh, CNN's done better debates so far, for both parties. Not being openly partisan and at least trying to present the image of serious journalism helps.
So far it looks to me, CNN > Fox > CNBC.
Oh, and CSPAN's was good too.
Originally posted by Surtur
But alright, I would vote we let Jon Stewart ask the questions. People should watch the videos on youtube on Stewart utterly ripping CNN a new one.
It sucks that he's retired and not interested.
Originally posted by Q99So far it looks to me, CNN > Fox > CNBC.
It sucks that he's retired and not interested.
I don't believe you really think this.
I think you see it like CNN>CNBC>MSNBC>Fox
CNN got caught deleting comments on their facebook about Sanders.
CNN should be last on your list now, but definitely not first.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
She lied to the family, get over it.
You seem to be actively dodging all the points. Like, say, an investigation not finding anything indicating there was any purposeful intent to deceive. Note that the misinformation came out at a level below hers.
Also, there's still the matter of the totally false accusations that she was responsible for the deaths, that people here and some Republicans still have no problem passing on, even though that's a total lie. Do you just give those lies a pass?
And I don't have a side here, there is right and wrong, and she was. You just won't accept the fact, and anything that comes out you immediately dismiss as a right wing conspiracy, as does Hilary, she has taught you well.
So now the Republican investigation is a right-wing conspiracy?
And the Republican people who admitted it was mostly pursued as a partisan attack are just made up?
See, you say 'there's right and wrong,' but you don't back up why your view is supposedly right, you dismiss any actual evidence as "You're just claiming there's a right-wing conspiracy," and you don't actually have evidence backing your side.
And when called on it, you resort to trying to accuse bias and straw-manning things, even when it's totally self-contradictory.
You're accusing me of accusing a right-wing conspiracy, when I am illustrating what the Republicans found out. The Republican investigation, that failed to find the evidence of your claims, while trying to prove your claims.
Do you ever get the slightest bit concerned about how you don't even bother to address facts and evidence that I bring up, or are you happy in your little sphere o' denial?