Originally posted by Q99
Eh, CNN's done better debates so far, for both parties. Not being openly partisan and at least trying to present the image of serious journalism helps.So far it looks to me, CNN > Fox > CNBC.
Hence why I said they aren't the same kind of turds, but turds nonetheless. Saying they are better then Fox and CNBC is like me saying I can run much faster then a guy with no legs. Such a statement would be as true as it is unimpressive.
Ehh, while they aren't perfect, and are a bit ratings-focused, CNN isn't *that* bad.
Though I do grant that none of the American networks are great. It'd be nice if we had something like the BBC over here.
I do also like the major newspapers more, too.
Originally posted by Star428
LOL. FOX is easily greater than all of those listed. Dems are so deluded.
If your judgement is based on who's most on your side, yes. This has little to do with accuracy in regard to facts.
If you only trust someone who agrees with your point of view, because they agree with your point of view, you can very easily be lead into blind alleys without knowing it.
Time-Immemorial
No, do you?
Well, considering I do address facts and evidence, I obviously care enough to double-check and look for reliable sources and preferably multiple ones with different viewpoints, so yes, I do like to check to make sure I'm not in a sphere o' denial.
Good to know you're at least open about not caring about the evidence. Kinda what I expected, but it doesn't hurt to check, y'know?