That wasn't even a question though, it was just yet another failure at baiting me, you're horrendous at this trolling and always have been. The intelligent thing to do on your part would just be to cease making an ass of yourself.
But hey me stating Kun > Vader when I have real sources to back that up with, is far more respectable than your asinine 'Surik sucks Revan's dick so therefore Revan > Nihilus is G-canon tier fact'.
Originally posted by AncientPower
when I have real sources to back that up with.
Do you just like to call people out at random or what oh and unless you have forgotten, their are two editions of TotJ one from 1996 and one from 2004 meant as a supplement to the KotOR CG, it was not its own book and infact is detailed under "adventures of Nomi Sunrider" oh by the way that KotOR CG has FOUR editions; the standard which is easy to find, the deluxe hardback, the Limited gloss print with foreward from Chris Avellone and the Limited Collector's Edition which has over a hundred extra pages dedicated to setting, it was only released in Canada and the U.K because thry failed to realease the Limited Edition in anywhere but the U.S.A.
Is this seriously the only thing you can do now, defecate the same three year old sh*t as a response?
The dark knowledge of the Sith teachings died with Kun, it is extremely unlikely that any records survive, either on Yavin IV or elsewhere (Keep in mind that even Darth Vader, himself a Dark Lord of the Sith, did not know all there is to know about Sith powers.)
- The Jedi Academy Sourcebook
So we know as a matter of fact, that Kun had more knowledge of the Sith and it's powers than Vader did and was thus a greater master of it. All of the other hype/accolades Kun has, that places him on a higher level than Vader simply backs that up.
What was your argument for Revan > Nihilus again? Wasn't it the opinion of one of Revan's most avid supporters? In the face of feats Revan can't hold a candle to? Would I be right?
*waits for yet another stale old trolling tactic to 'counter' with*
Originally posted by AncientPower
The dark knowledge of the Sith teachings died with Kun, it is extremely unlikely that any records survive, either on Yavin IV or elsewhere (Keep in mind that even Darth Vader, himself a Dark Lord of the Sith, did not know all there is to know about Sith powers.)
- The Jedi Academy SourcebookSo we know as a matter of fact, that Kun had more knowledge of the Dark Side than Vader did and was thus a greater master of it.
Why? That quote doesn't say Exar Kun had more knowledge nor that he was a greater master. Could one infer that from the quote? Sure, but it's certainly not fact.
It says the dark knowledge of the Sith teachings died with Exar Kun, e.g; the Dark Holocron, Naga Sadow's trove. 'Keeping in mind' that Vader doesn't know everything about Sith powers, in a statement comparing to Exar Kun's knowledge/teachings/power.
TLDR; Exar Kun knows everything about Sith powers unlike Darth Vader because that knowledge died with him.
I don't see how else you could logically make an inferrence from that statement.
Ant, care to point out how that source is retconned? Because that sounds like biased dismissal on your part to me.
Originally posted by AncientPower
Ant, care to point out how that source is retconned? Becaude that sounds like biased dismissal on your part to me.
Assuming the sourcebook guide of the novel follows the actual novel, it's going to base a lot off that revelation.
Naga Sadow's trove lived on with the Banite Sith though, courtesy of Bane finding Nadd's holocron. Unless that was lost with Gravid's twerking, but obviously either way Sadow's knowledge wasn't lost when Kun lost his body and became anchored to the temple. Unless that quote is referring to the knowledge being lost after Kun's spirit was vanquished, in which case it has no bearing on the Banite Sith line, since they were all already dead.
Edit: Dooku also had the Dark holocron at one point, so... that wasn't lost either.
Originally posted by AncientPower
It says the dark knowledge of the Sith teachings died with Exar Kun, e.g; the Dark Holocron, Naga Sadow's trove. 'Keeping in mind' that Vader doesn't know everything about Sith powers, in a statement comparing to Exar Kun's knowledge/teachings/power.TLDR; Exar Kun knows everything about Sith powers unlike Darth Vader because that knowledge died with him.
I don't see how else you could logically make an inferrence from that statement.
Ant, care to point out how that source is retconned? Because that sounds like biased dismissal on your part to me.
So you're extrapolating that to mean Exar Kun knew everything about the Sith Powers... Christ.
All it states is that the dark knowledge (And by this I assume they are referring o Sadow's teachings correct?) died with Kun. They then reinforce this by saying even Vader doesn't know all there is about Sith powers. That's why Vader is brought up; it's not a comparison to Kun but rather to show that knowledge has been lost.
Originally posted by AncientPower
Uh no lol, I own Dark Apprentice and the beginning doesn't state that. Whatever 'warped' means.
It's from the Publisher / Internal Flap. 👆 My .txt has it starting first, MB.