Blizzard's Overwatch

Started by Quincy27 pages

Yeah it just means you need to practice.

Lots of McCree players are miffed because now they have to AIM.

haermm 👆

It's not that her nerfs themselves were unreasonable (like I said, she's still pretty viable), just that I didn't see them as necessary like with McCree. shrug McCree was a different beast entirely that was OP in most situations, which the same can't really be said for Widowmaker, so I don't get why she's being lumped with him here.

Well I think the big issue was that even just random body shots against Zenyatta and Tracer were killing them

Originally posted by Ridley_Prime
It's not that her nerfs themselves were unreasonable (like I said, she's still pretty viable), just that I didn't see them as necessary like with McCree. shrug McCree was a different beast entirely that was OP in most situations, which the same can't really be said for Widowmaker, so I don't get why she's being lumped with him here.
They did most likely for competitive play. A Widowmaker with a decent team around her was counterable by another Widowmaker. And not only that but decent Widowmaker's could carry a team by themselves.

Reading rumors that the next Hero may be a Support/Sniper class. What a cool idea.

Originally posted by Ridley_Prime
It's not that her nerfs themselves were unreasonable (like I said, she's still pretty viable), just that I didn't see them as necessary like with McCree. shrug McCree was a different beast entirely that was OP in most situations, which the same can't really be said for Widowmaker, so I don't get why she's being lumped with him here.
Widowmaker was a powerful pick in like every situation lol. There was never a time when Widowmaker was a bad pick.

Furthermore, her ability to animation cancel her scoping to get two full-power shots off in less than a second was ****ing gay.

But aren't you gay?

The animation cancel exploit was the only thing that needed to be fixed with Widowmaker.
Anyhow if you played her without that exploit , then the nerf wasn't too bad. She basically still plays the same, save for body shots and her Ult taking longer to fill up.

I still see no-skill Hanzo players blindly shooting into crowds hoping to hit something. And of coarse they do because of those big fuqing arrow hitboxes.
Lets keep ignoring that shit isnt broken.

My 11 year old daughter really wants this game. Is it kid friendly?

Also, is the hype real? Game Informer gave this game a perfect 10, but Angry Joe awarded it a 7.

Originally posted by Nephthys
One thing that "just bugs me" is the meme of D.Va drinking Mountain Dew and eating Dorito's. It just annoys me, she's ****ing Korean you twits they don't have that shit over there, they have tons of unique local junk food. It's another case of nerds having no perception of things outside their own experience, like how Peridot in Steven Universe is a dorito as well despite looking nothing like one at all because shitty nerds are only aware of the crap they shovel into their stupid fat neckbeard mouths and can't see anything beyond that. Shes a ****ing angry slice of pie, they even say it on the goddamn mother****ing show! I hate the internet so much!

That just bothers me a little.

Chill out, retard.

Originally posted by Impediment
My 11 year old daughter really wants this game. Is it kid friendly?

Also, is the hype real? Game Informer gave this game a perfect 10, but Angry Joe awarded it a 7.

Everything in-game is fairly kid friendly. It's a FPS so there's obviously some violence but there's no dismemberment or anything. I'd be more worried about other players calling your daughter a whore/telling her to kill herself/asking her for nudes than the content in-game though, since it does have a heavy multiplayer focus.

I wouldn't call it a perfect 10 personally, but I'm an elitist **** who would refuse to give a game that is solely a multiplayer arena shooter a perfect score. It's really fun though.

On the console version of Overwatch, there's no in-game voice/text chat so the chances of your kid being exposed to the rude elements of online play are slim. I'd probably go with that one.

The hype is real

barker

https://gfycat.com/RawSaneDegus

fuq hanzo.

dey nerfin torbs turrets. 30# dmg nerf.

babies

Console version only, because shitty console controllers aren't accurate enough for players to snipe the turrets.

I know its for consoles. Its still dumb. I got no problem sniping turrets -_-

Originally posted by Inhuman
barker

https://gfycat.com/RawSaneDegus

Blame Blizzard for letting hitscan weapons in the game.

If projectile weapons had the same hitboxes as hitscan weapons, why would you play them?

Unless you're saying their overall damage should be buffed to compensate for the removal of the wider hitbox, so that Hanzo can one-shot squishy characters with a body shot?

Originally posted by NemeBro
Blame Blizzard for letting hitscan weapons in the game.

If projectile weapons had the same hitboxes as hitscan weapons, why would you play them?

Unless you're saying their overall damage should be buffed to compensate for the removal of the wider hitbox, so that Hanzo can one-shot squishy characters with a body shot?

Are you saying you are OK with Hanzo being able to kill people that are behind cover, inside buildings away from his line of sight with his bullshit arrows?
And I do blame Blizzard for not fixing this broken character yet.

Yeah nothing wrong with Killing people by hitting empty air.

I have no issue getting headshoted by Torbjorn's left click. That is a projectile, NOT a hitscan weapon. And it doesn't have the huge retarded hit boxes like Hanzos arrows do.

Make the hit boxes like Torb's left click. And , No I don't think that reducing the hit boxes means giving him some other EZ win training wheels buff.

I think Hanzo this way can be playable without being broken.