2000ft Destroyer vs FP Tyrant

Originally posted by h1a8
Mjolnir withstood attacks which were on the level of 1/5 of the universe destroying. Yet Destroyer still sliced through it. Also, energy projection durability has absolutely no bearing on cutting durability or blunt force durability. Galactus has been damaged by blunt force multiple times (even by Mjolnir). So clearly, Tyrant can be hacked up by the Odin Sword. And Destroyer sliced through Celestials with utmost ease. There was no resistance. This implies that it could have hacked through something 5 times more durable.

Tyrant has never been shown to be cut so the onus is on you. Big deal Destroyer wrecked Thor's hammer , it broke on Bor. Tyrants power dwarfs Bor so by your logic he would annihilate Thor's hammer and proving to be to powerful for the destroyer.

Fact remains Tyrant was equal to someone who beat several Celestials, The Destroyer wasn't.

Originally posted by Insane Titan
all impact is the same in comics , writers don't give a shit about the nonsense you're talking about.

Tyrant has never been shown to be cut so the onus is on you. Big deal Destroyer wrecked Thor's hammer , it broke on Bor. Tyrants power dwarfs Bor so by your logic he would annihilate Thor's hammer and proving to be to powerful for the destroyer.

Fact remains Tyrant was equal to someone who beat several Celestials, The Destroyer wasn't.

Lasers don't act like sledge hammers. Lasers burn, sledge hammers crush. You can't equate all durability as the same. Otherwise, we wouldn't have threads debating who has better cut force durability, who has better durability against blasts, blunt force, etc.

Anyway, Tyrant isn't cut proof just because he wasn't shown to be cut. That's a no limit fallacy. No one has ever tried to cut him. Galactus has been cut by far less and he is a peer to Tyrant.

Finally, you are picking and choosing what feats count and what feats don't count. This is trolling. I gave many examples of Galactus being hurt by far less than Destroyers attacks. Yet you are ignoring them. Only an idiot would believe that Destroyer can't slice Tyrant up if he let him. Then you are picking and choosing Mjolnir feats. Mjolnir breaking on Bor is proof to how durable Bor is, not the opposite.

Tyrant either gets hacked to pieces or he gets disintegrated.

Originally posted by h1a8
Lasers don't act like sledge hammers. Lasers burn, sledge hammers crush. You can't equate all durability as the same. Otherwise, we wouldn't have threads debating who has better cut force durability, who has better durability against blasts, blunt force, etc.

Anyway, Tyrant isn't cut proof just because he wasn't shown to be cut. That's a no limit fallacy. No one has ever tried to cut him. Galactus has been cut by far less and he is a peer to Tyrant.

Finally, you are picking and choosing what feats count and what feats don't count. This is trolling. I gave many examples of Galactus being hurt by far less than Destroyers attacks. Yet you are ignoring them. Only an idiot would believe that Destroyer can't slice Tyrant up if he let him. Then you are picking and choosing Mjolnir feats. Mjolnir breaking on Bor is proof to how durable Bor is, not the opposite.

Tyrant either gets hacked to pieces or he gets disintegrated.

Originally posted by Insane Titan
still waiting on proof of anything you just said. Cry more about the fact you can't handle by comparative showings Tyrant wins.

1. Tyrant is a peer to Galactus
2. Galactus on average will be cut by the Odin Sword and damaged with sufficient blunt force or concentrated energy projection.
3. Mjolnir durability feats matches or exceeds Tyrants feats and Galactus feats.
4. Galactus was afraid of Odin when he entered a normal sized Destroyer.
5. Destroyer sliced Mjolnir easily with weaker hand beams.
6. 2000ft Destroyer beams are vastly more powerful.

Galactus was amped on four planets when he fought celestials.

Tyrant wasn't equal to Galactus. He was beaten the first time and was getting thrashed the second time until Galactus used his energy converter.

Odinsword will slice him in half.

And how is Tyrant more powerful than Bor? He could've killed classic Thor in one hit.

Tyrant couldn't even ko a weakened BRB with one attack.

mmm

Originally posted by abhilegend

You done trolling?

Originally posted by Insane Titan
still waiting on proof of anything you just said.

Originally posted by h1a8
Well you will be waiting in vain.

.......

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
.......

Originally posted by h1a8

1. Tyrant is a peer to Galactus
2. Galactus on average will be cut by the Odin Sword and damaged with sufficient blunt force or concentrated energy projection.
3. Mjolnir durability feats matches or exceeds Tyrants feats and Galactus feats.
4. Galactus was afraid of Odin when he entered a normal sized Destroyer.
5. Destroyer sliced Mjolnir easily with weaker hand beams.
6. 2000ft Destroyer beams are vastly more powerful.

So your line about waiting in vain wasn't needed?

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
So your line about waiting in vain wasn't needed?

Irony of h1 accusing someone of ignoring something. Go cry claiming trolling when presented with facts you can't argue against.

Originally posted by h1a8
Lasers don't act like sledge hammers. Lasers burn, sledge hammers crush. You can't equate all durability as the same. Otherwise, we wouldn't have threads debating who has better cut force durability, who has better durability against blasts, blunt force, etc.

Anyway, Tyrant isn't cut proof just because he wasn't shown to be cut. That's a no limit fallacy. No one has ever tried to cut him. Galactus has been cut by far less and he is a peer to Tyrant.

Finally, you are picking and choosing what feats count and what feats don't count. This is trolling. I gave many examples of Galactus being hurt by far less than Destroyers attacks. Yet you are ignoring them. Only an idiot would believe that Destroyer can't slice Tyrant up if he let him. Then you are picking and choosing Mjolnir feats. Mjolnir breaking on Bor is proof to how durable Bor is, not the opposite.

Tyrant either gets hacked to pieces or he gets disintegrated.

The only time asgardian magic/force was used on tyrant was BRB when he hurled stormbreaker to absolutely zero effect.

And That was DP Tyrant.

That's the only Canon instance of any interaction between asgard and tyrant

Originally posted by Power Cosmic II
The only time asgardian magic/force was used on tyrant was BRB when he hurled stormbreaker to absolutely zero effect.

And That was DP Tyrant.

That's the only Canon instance of any interaction between asgard and tyrant

Storm breaker couldn't do any damage to Mjolnir, but a small Destroyer can

Originally posted by psycho gundam
It grew to that size cause Odin + all other Asgardians except Thor were powering it with their spirits. When it got slagged by the Celestials they all died as a result

Yeah. It was powered by all of Asgard, including Odin.

And Celestials of the time shrugged off attacks from an entire group of skyfathers. I can't see Galactus doing that, and FP Tyrant was about as strong as a well fed Big G..

If AD has the Odinsword, that would probably cut Tyrant in half.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Galactus was amped on four planets when he fought celestials.

Tyrant wasn't equal to Galactus. He was beaten the first time and was getting thrashed the second time until Galactus used his energy converter.

Odinsword will slice him in half.

And how is Tyrant more powerful than Bor? He could've killed classic Thor in one hit.

Tyrant couldn't even ko a weakened BRB with one attack.

mmm

So you're doing your moron routine again eh? Nice!!!!