Thor vs Hulk

Started by Robtard17 pages

Originally posted by quanchi112
Hulk's battle with Thor and Hulk's battle with the upgraded hulk buster Iron Man suit. Your turn.
Counter 1: Thor was holding back, as per his words and actions. He didn't want to harm Hulk (an ally) and he didn't want to bring down the helicarrier

Counter 2: Hulk was KO'd when he fought IM-HB.

Now that you've properly been bent over and "countered", here's the killing stoke:

-Thor surviving the massive Bi-Frost explosion at ground zero unharmed shows he durability towards great force

-Thor's superior H2H skills, he dodged and ducked some of Hulk's attacks. He's a trained warrior with possibly a few centuries of experience

-Thor's greater versatility, lighting and tornadoes attacks

-Thor having to be gimped here of a few abilities to even make this a fight

Wasn't even remotely hard, quanboy. LoL!

Originally posted by Robtard
Counter 1: Thor was holding back, as per his words and actions. He didn't want to harm Hulk (an ally) and he didn't want to bring down the helicarrier

Counter 2: Hulk was KO'd when he fought IM-HB.

Now that you've properly been bent over and "countered", here's the killing stoke.

-Thor surviving the massive Bi-Frost explosion at ground zero unharmed shows he durability towards great force

-Thor's superior H2H skills, he dodged and ducked some of Hulk's attacks. He's a trained warrior

-Thor's greater versatility, lighting and tornadoes attacks

-Thor having to be gimped here of a few abilities to even make this a fight

Wasn't even remotely hard, quanboy. LoL!

Thor was losing. Prove him going all out would significantly matter here.

He tore through many different suits in a far superior IronMan than Thor fought. Did Thor tear through his inferior suit ?

What does that have to do with the Hulk ? We see the Hulk's attacks clearly hurt him. He punched him out later in the first film.

Versatility is nice but effectiveness is also greater than that.

You seem to distance yourself away from he portrayals of the characters as you try to bastardize your way through these characters.

Thor eats him.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Thor was losing. Prove him going all out would significantly matter here.

He tore through many different suits in a far superior IronMan than Thor fought. Did Thor tear through his inferior suit ?

What does that have to do with the Hulk ? We see the Hulk's attacks clearly hurt him. He punched him out later in the first film.

Versatility is nice but effectiveness is also greater than that.

You seem to distance yourself away from he portrayals of the characters as you try to bastardize your way through these characters.

That's not a counter What we do know is that Thor was holding back, otherwise those two going all out would have ruined the ship and killed people.

That's not a counter. Thor was holding back as to not kill IM.

That's not a counter. That's a red herring. Thor also wasn't "punched out".

That's not a counter: Versatility gives one an edge.

Now you're accusing me of something you're well own for: Downplaying who you need to see lose. You debate by not showing how your pick wins, but how shitty you imagine the opposition is. This is why you always fail.

So you didn't counter a single point of mine and tried to downplay Thor. In short, you lost again.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Thor eats him.
Hulk is the beast of the team not Thor.

Thor could have been knocked out off screen for a few minutes. We don't really know.

Originally posted by Tattoos N Scars
Thor could have been knocked out off screen for a few minutes. We don't really know.

Then we can't really use that as an argument since we don't know. But logic would dictate that he was awake before and after the cutaway and nothing was mentioned or hinted at him being KO'd so was can assume he wasn't

Originally posted by quanchi112
Hulk is the beast of the team not Thor.
He would eat him anyway just to prove a point.

Originally posted by Robtard
That's not a counter What we do know is that Thor was holding back, otherwise those two going all out would have ruined the ship and killed people.

That's not a counter. Thor was holding back as to not kill IM.

That's not a counter. That's a red herring. Thor also wasn't "punched out".

That's not a counter: Versatility gives one an edge.

Now you're accusing me of something you're well own for: Downplaying who you need to see lose. You debate by not showing how your pick wins, but how shitty you imagine the opposition is. This is why you always fail.

So you didn't counter a single point of mine and tried to downplay Thor. In short, you lost again.

Speculation. What we do know is the longer the fight went on the more it favored Hulk.,

Thor was trying to damage Ironman. He failed to do so.

Yes, he was.

Versatility doesn't overrule what's effective.

There are facts so downplaying is merely a word a troll like yourself would use in order to avoid certain facts.

The portrayals clearly favored the Hulk in direct comparison to Thor.

Thor fought IM at 400%. At the end of the fight, IM was damaged and Thor was completely unharmed.

Hulk fought an un-amped IM but one that had Hulkbuster. At the end of the fight, IM was damaged and Hulk was KOd

Originally posted by FrothByte
Thor fought IM at 400%. At the end of the fight, IM was damaged and Thor was completely unharmed.

Hulk fought an un-amped IM but one that had Hulkbuster. At the end of the fight, IM was damaged and Hulk was KOd

Hulkbuster armor was obviously for Hulk. Hulk tore through it quite easily but Ironman had enough to eventually get the win over a troubled Hulk. Thor didn't tear through his armor which was obviously thinner and not specifically designed to combat Thor.

Do you believe that Ironman defeats the Hulkbuster Ironman ?

I believe that IM can't beat Hulk without his Hulkbuster armor but that Thor can also make short work of the Hulk Buster armor.

Rock, paper, scissors analogy.

Although the hulkbuster armor is more powerful than the armor that IM fought Thor with, it is also far slower and less agile. IM was already having a hard time landing hits on their fight, if it wasn't for his thrusters he probably wouldn't have landed any.

Thor will run circles around the Hulkbuster and Hulk can easily crush the armor that IM fought Thor with

Originally posted by FrothByte
I believe that IM can't beat Hulk without his Hulkbuster armor but that Thor can also make short work of the Hulk Buster armor.

Rock, paper, scissors analogy.

Although the hulkbuster armor is more powerful than the armor that IM fought Thor with, it is also far slower and less agile. IM was already having a hard time landing hits on their fight, if it wasn't for his thrusters he probably wouldn't have landed any.

Thor will run circles around the Hulkbuster and Hulk can easily crush the armor that IM fought Thor with

I do not think so considering Hulk wasn't landing hits on Thor initially either but later started getting the better of him.

Before the fighter jet got involved Hulk was winning. Abc logic not withstanding and the fact the two Ironman suits were different I'd say the evidence directly supports my take on this.

Hulk has the strength to put Thor down, the hammer makes the fight questionable.

Originally posted by Tattoos N Scars
Thor could have been knocked out off screen for a few minutes. We don't really know.

Just like Thor could have ko'd the Hulk 18,000 times off screen between all the MCU movies?

SM you think Thor could have stopped the LV like Hulk did with just his fist?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Just like Thor could have ko'd the Hulk 18,000 times off screen between all the MCU movies?
Be serious.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I do not think so considering Hulk wasn't landing hits on Thor initially either but later started getting the better of him.

Before the fighter jet got involved Hulk was winning. Abc logic not withstanding and the fact the two Ironman suits were different I'd say the evidence directly supports my take on this.

I actually agree with Quan for a change!

Originally posted by quanchi112
I do not think so considering Hulk wasn't landing hits on Thor initially either but later started getting the better of him.

Before the fighter jet got involved Hulk was winning. Abc logic not withstanding and the fact the two Ironman suits were different I'd say the evidence directly supports my take on this.

Let's be honest here. Hulk landed only 3 clean hits on Thor. The only one that actually hurt Thor was a sucker punch. The other two Hulk was only able to land because Thor decided to try an restrain Hulk (choke hold) as compared to just another Mjolnir smash which would have been far easier.

Just because the fight was interrupted while Hulk had the upper hand does not mean he was winning the fight. If the fight had been interrupted when Thor kneed Hulk would you then say Thor was winning?

Fact is, there was no clear winner of that fight since both combatants were not seriously hurt. Had the fight continued another few minutes we don't know who would have come on top (considering of cours that Thor stuck to pure melee).

Hulk wins.

Absolutely stomped Thors main rogue, wrecked Ultron beyond repair when he got pissed, significantly more durable and stronger than Thor plus the gap will only widen as the fight goes on. He took dozens of punches to the face from Hulkbuster which was initially as strong as he was with no visible damage, that's insane. Tbh he's been virtually unstoppable up to this point (suckerpunches not withstanding).