NASA Study on Global Warming
Burning fossil fuels cools the planet.
Of coarse the drive by liberal media in America won't post this.
NASA Study on Global Warming
Burning fossil fuels cools the planet.
Of coarse the drive by liberal media in America won't post this.
LoL, TI. Good one.
But the main point of the story is about current models being too simplistic in accurately determining climate change.
The concern is that current models won't tell us how bad climate change could get, because some human caused cooling affects haven't been factored in correctly into the model.
"The study found existing models for climate change had been too simplistic and did not account for these factors." -snip
"But, rather than being good news, NASA has concluded the lack of taking these factors into account means existing climate change models have underestimated at the future impact on global temperatures will be."-snip
"Because earlier studies do not account for what amounts to a net cooling effect for parts of the northern hemisphere, predictions for TCR and ECS have been lower than they should be." -snip
"This means that Earth's climate sensitivity to carbon dioxide—or atmospheric carbon dioxide's capacity to affect temperature change—has been underestimated, according to the study." -snip
"If you've got a systematic underestimate of what the greenhouse gas-driven change would be, then you’re systematically underestimating what’s going to happen in the future when greenhouse gases are by far the dominant climate driver." -snip
I thought this was in interesting response to the article though in the comments section of said article:
"How long will it be before the left decries this as junk science. When in truth, ALLL of the global warming science is based on climate models on computers, where the programers just input the data they want to get the result they want. Thats the real junk science.
I had spoken with a climate scientist who was being interviewed on a local radio station and posed this question to him...Is it possible that any variance in the climate temperature over the last 100 years, (1 tenth of 1 degree Celsius), is actually more a response of the more accurate measurements of the temperature due to more accurate measuring devices? More modern technology responding to more accurate measurements being the difference. He had to acknowledge that this was a factual argument, plus he admitted we now have satellites that can accurately measure the temperature throughout the atmosphere which was not available 100 years ago. This was a climate scientist admitting this. "
By: dannyo663
We should be more concerned with the massize amounts of trash/toxicity in our water over climate change.
Originally posted by Bardock42
So, seems like things are worse than even the liberals warned about, really awful that so many conservatives still deny it and do anything in their power to stop us dealing with it.Thanks for sharing, TI, good find.
The headline says burning fossil fuels cools the planet. 😂
Originally posted by Star428
Exactly. But why bother trying to explain that to liberal progressives? Waste of time. They enjoy being ignorant. Ignorance is bliss.
1. Ignorance is often subjugation and misery.
2. If you truly value people, you will HAVE to learn to fight for them and the best ways of doing so, and saying "Why bother?" is not an option.
Because there are other people actively working against those you care about.
In regards to the OP's topic, the following might prove far more productive than an ad hominem attack: