NASA Study on Global Warming

Started by Robtard3 pages

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
No I didn't.

I just read the headline

"BURNING fossil fuels and cutting down trees causes global COOLING, a shock new NASA study has found."

I guess the headline is lying and in the article they change their position.

The writer and editors should be shot if this is the case.

It's not lying or misleading though, the article goes on to explain things directly related to the cooling effects.

If you read the snippets I quoted for you, you'd get the gist of it. Or you could also choose to read the entire article, for the full monty.

Originally posted by Bardock42
So, seems like things are worse than even the liberals warned about, really awful that so many conservatives still deny it and do anything in their power to stop us dealing with it.

Thanks for sharing, TI, good find.

This is a good find indeed.

As an American, I'm happy that the Paris agreements was a success, gives me hope not only for our great nation regarding climate change, but also the world.

I bet you do nothing environmentally friendly in your daily life. No clue why you care about Paris agreement.

😂

Can't actually come up with an argument? Make an attack at the poster!

Again, your trying so hard.

Originally posted by bluewaterrider
1. Ignorance is often subjugation and misery.
2. If you truly value people, you will HAVE to learn to fight for them and the best ways of doing so, and saying "Why bother?" is not an option.
Because there are other people actively working against those you care about.

In regards to the OP's topic, the following might prove far more productive than an ad hominem attack:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0gDErDwXqhc

http://www.express.co.uk/news/clarifications-corrections/526191/Climate-change-is-a-lie-global-warming-not-real-claims-weather-channel-founder

Pretty sure the founder of the Weather Channel is more knowledgeable about the reality of the situation than any liberal posting on this forum. 👆

I also have to agree with Pat Sajak. He said this:

I now believe global warming alarmists are unpatriotic racists knowingly misleading for their own ends...-Pat Sajak (Wheel of Fortune game show host)

It's also costing us $4 billion dollars a day. It's sick how liberals are peddling this horseshit that is costing us so much money every single day.

Originally posted by Star428
http://www.express.co.uk/news/clarifications-corrections/526191/Climate-change-is-a-lie-global-warming-not-real-claims-weather-channel-founder

Pretty sure the founder of the Weather Channel is more knowledgeable about the reality of the situation than any liberal posting on this forum. 👆

John Coleman isn't a scientist.

Originally posted by Star428
http://www.express.co.uk/news/clarifications-corrections/526191/Climate-change-is-a-lie-global-warming-not-real-claims-weather-channel-founder

Pretty sure the founder of the Weather Channel is more knowledgeable about the reality of the situation than any liberal posting on this forum. 👆

I also have to agree with Pat Sajak. He said this:

I now believe global warming alarmists are unpatriotic racists knowingly misleading for their own ends...-Pat Sajak (Wheel of Fortune game show host)

It's also costing us $4 billion dollars a day. It's sick how liberals are peddling this horseshit that is costing us so much money every single day.

So you believe a retired journalist and a game show host know more about global climate change than the United States Armed Forces?

Funny though people believe Obama when he says he's Christian though, even though all he talks about is Allah and his Muslim faith.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Funny though people believe Obama when he says he's Christian though, even though all he talks about is Allah and his Muslim faith.

Only the liberal sheep believes him, TI. Those of us who know how to use our brains know better. 👆

Global warming? It's such nonsense. Well it's 60 degree's here in Chicago, I'm going to go enjoy this perfectly natural weather. We are known for our warm winters.

Originally posted by Surtur
Global warming? It's such nonsense. Well it's 60 degree's here in Chicago, I'm going to go enjoy this perfectly natural weather. We are known for our warm winters.

You guys have nothing on Rochester, Minnesota.
Thought I was pretty hardy coming from Michigan and all the bad weather it brings. Stepped outside Mayo clinic at night with the equivalent of a heavy sports jacket. Going on a food run for a patient, or so I thought, but I nearly doubled over from pain before 30 seconds was up. Had to go back inside ...
Fingers were aching, midsection felt as if someone had struck me. Grasped it intellectually before then, of course, but I never TRULY understood a person could die from exposure to cold until that moment.
Man, if there's any place colder than THAT during the winter season, I NEVER want to go there ...

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Funny though people believe Obama when he says he's Christian though, even though all he talks about is Allah and his Muslim faith.

Confirmation bias lol. You ignore all the times he mentions his Christian faith/talks about Christianity and even the time he sang Gospel in Charleston but hold up any instance of him mentioning Islam as proof he's a Muslim.

😂

Right so his empty word mean more then his actual actions..

Why do you hate the idea of him being Muslim?

You're right, TI. Actions speak louder than words and it's clear judging by his actions that he is a muslim.

Originally posted by Star428
You're right, TI. Actions speak louder than words and it's clear judging by his actions that he is a muslim.

Did you know the "M" in KMC really stands for Muslim?

😂😂

Killer Muslims

Originally posted by Robtard
LoL, TI. Good one.

But the main point of the story is about current models being too simplistic in accurately determining climate change.

The concern is that current models won't tell us how bad climate change could get, because some human caused cooling affects haven't been factored in correctly into the model.

"The study found existing models for climate change had been too simplistic and did not account for these factors." -snip

"But, rather than being good news, NASA has concluded the lack of taking these factors into account means existing climate change models have underestimated at the future impact on global temperatures will be."-snip

"Because earlier studies do not account for what amounts to a net cooling effect for parts of the northern hemisphere, predictions for TCR and ECS have been lower than they should be." -snip

"This means that Earth's climate sensitivity to carbon dioxide—or atmospheric carbon dioxide's capacity to affect temperature change—has been underestimated, according to the study." -snip

"If you've got a systematic underestimate of what the greenhouse gas-driven change would be, then you’re systematically underestimating what’s going to happen in the future when greenhouse gases are by far the dominant climate driver." -snip


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTt8IzilofM