Batman(Bale) & Bane vs John Matrix & John Rambo(08)

Started by quanchi1122 pages

Originally posted by golem370
McClane is a character what impresses me more because he is not a war vet or highly trained soldier he is just a tough SOB who doesn't stop until every bad guy is down.
He gets his ass kicked and is a pos.

is this a joke thread or a spite thread because Matrix and Rambo stomp hard

Originally posted by Silent Master
I think relentless1's argument that a random Joe that has never used a gun before has the same level of shooting skill as Mr Smith from the movie Shoot em up, or Deadshot from the comics clearly shows which person in this thread holds the real bias.

Thats the dumbest argument I've ever heard. By the same token you could dismiss Matrix/Rambos feats because they are also going up against fodder. You can't have it both ways hater.

Glad that you realize how dumb you were sounding.

Less than three months until Batman starts winning matches.

I'm sure silent master will still be on here hating

Well he did say he would give Bruce wins, if he deserves them.

And I will, if his feats merit it. However relentless1 thinks Baleman should be given wins solely because he's Baleman.

And he should.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He gets his ass kicked and is a pos.

I didn't think you went off topic in threads?

Originally posted by golem370
McClane is a character what impresses me more because he is not a war vet or highly trained soldier he is just a tough SOB who doesn't stop until every bad guy is down.

👆

KMC's #1 MVF star too boot

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
And he should.

Because charity is the only way Baleman could ever win?

Originally posted by Tattoos N Scars
I didn't think you went off topic in threads?
Exceptions.

Matrix and Rambo

To discount McClane against any 80s action movie characters would be dumb he does thing clearly outside the box that work, he is a skilled shooter tough as nails he killed 5 or so armed men in a elevator pretty badass scene.

Does anyone else want to see relentless1 back up his claim that a random Joe that has never used a gun before has exactly the same chance of hitting someone than the best marksmen in fiction?