Terrorists Take Over Federal Building in Oregon

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Yes it was browns father who basically started that crap, of coarse he served no jail time because technically that is freedom of speech. Liberals will stand up for those rights because he is black, but if the person is white, lynch them. I am starting to wonder if liberals are more racist then conservatives.

I just can't help wonder what would happen if a judge tried to send some black men back to prison to serve more time because he felt the previous sentence wasn't harsh enough.

Can you imagine the media shitstorm? The first thing out of some peoples mouth would be "it must be racism". I guarantee you that within 24 hours they'd have a petition up online calling for the judge to resign..and most likely also a "Go Fund Me" page open.

Originally posted by Robtard
TIL: If white people take over a building using guns, they're just exercising their Constitutional rights

TIL: If black people riot, loot, pillage, close business its ok because they are black.

Can you find a thread where rioting, looting and pillaging by black people is condoned? Every time a thread has been made on the matter, people condemn the looters while separating them form the peaceful protesters, while the opposition insist they're all the same.

So shutting down private business, streets is peaceful and condoned.

Why do you always play the same card?

You have no argument here unless you are just trying to discriminate against your own ethnicity.

You're equating a peaceful civil protest to taking over a building via force/guns as being the same.

The truth card. I try.

Are you implying that I'm a race-traitor or something? If so, stop. I did laugh though.

Prove they took over by any more then BLM tearing cities apart.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial So what you did was find a white issue where people are standing up for their rights in a peaceful way

A group using the threat of violence (guns) to take over federal property and stating that "violence is an option" if the police try to take it back is "standing up for their rights peacefully"?

The more you know

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

Your link is broken.

And, you didn't answer my question.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Prove they took over by any more then BLM tearing cities apart.

I don't see peaceful protest and armed takeovers as being the same, maybe that's just me.

Buy if you're insisting that what BLM does is no different than these people, what is your beef with BLM; wouldn't they also just be "exercising their rights"?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
You are killing people, so that is against the law.

Don't get upset now and throw a fit because your OP was trolling.

Ironically you have no problem with Black Lives matter and all the actual chaos they have caused.

Shows your true colors.

QFT.

My beef is the bias. They actually cause violence regardless if they have guns or not.

What is your beef with these people trying to defend their rights?

Originally posted by Tzeentch
Your link is broken.

And, you didn't answer my question.

You didn't ask a question you ended a sentence with a question mark with no actual question.

Originally posted by Tzeentch
A group using the threat of violence (guns) to take over federal property and stating that "violence is an option" if the police try to take it back is "standing up for their rights peacefully"?

So where is the violence they have committed?

And why don't you just admit you made this thread to go after conservative white people.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
My beef is the bias. They actually cause violence regardless if they have guns or not.

What is your beef with these people trying to defend their rights?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
You didn't ask a question you ended a sentence with a question mark with no actual question.

So where is the violence they have committed?

And why don't you just admit you made this thread to go after conservative white people.

Can you point out to me where in the definition of terrorism it states that you have to commit violence to be a terrorist?

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=define+terrorism

Emphasis on intimidation. The threat of violence is all that's required to commit terrorism. Are you going to tell me that walking into a federal building armed to the teeth and telling authorities that you will use violence if they try to remove you from the building is not threatening violence?

And no one has the right to do what BLM is doing, yet some how its all legal and such.

And yes that is exactly why the second amendment was written. Don't try and say it was not.

Originally posted by Tzeentch
Can you point out to me where in the definition of terrorism it states that you have to commit violence to be a terrorist?

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=define+terrorism

Emphasis on intimidation. The threat of violence is all that's required to commit terrorism.

So you say I didn't answer your question, even though you really didn't ask one, then I ask you one, you ignore it and ask a real question😂

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
And no one has the right to do what BLM is doing, yet some how its all legal and such.

And yes that is exactly why the second amendment was written. Don't try and say it was not.

No it wasn't. Please, Mr. Constitutional Scholar, show me the actual text that says that. As I recall, the 2nd Amendment was for the maintenance of a well-regulated militia--not a bunch of rednecks in camo chewing tobacco and watching football on their SEC TV apps.

Im not getting into a long drawn out debate on conservative white people vs liberal black people ideology. and people wonder why this country is so divided.👆

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
My beef is the bias. They actually cause violence regardless if they have guns or not.

What is your beef with these people trying to defend their rights?

BLM is a peaceful group, there are people who cause violence during said protest, but that is not BLM's methods or supported.

The part where they took over a government buildings armed with guns and threatened violence (what the guns are for). People/groups protest all the time and they don't use guns.