Hm, this is a tough one... because there's a lot of different metrics.
I mean, on the one hand, FDR has WW2 and Social Security and New Deal, all huge successes. On the other, he has internment.
Nixon has his sizable share of accomplishments too, but his obvious minuses as well.
Originally posted by Star428
🙄He didn't ask who the worst President of all-time was did he? So why u picked Obama's muslim race-baiting divisive joke ass is beyond me.
Obama outperformed quite a few presidents in a whole lot of metrics.
I mean, needless to say, his employment numbers blow Herbert Hoover's out of the water.
He's only 'worst' in the sense you like him the least and he's the current 'main opponent' of your party, you'll be hard pressed to find any objective measure where he performs even near the bottom, and in some he's fairly high up there.
Give it a decade or so, or maybe just the next Dem president, and you'll probably have a completely different opinion.
(Also, I find 'race baiting' to be a particularly silly complain about him- "He's black, and then we we call him on it, we get accused of being racist! That's totally race baiting!"😉.
Originally posted by Lord Lucien
No love for Bush Sr?
He's solid, IMO the best Republican president in my lifetime, but he doesn't have any real groundbreaking policies to put him in the top tier.
Originally posted by ares834
Carter? Really?Admittedly he was from before my time, but from what I've heard was he was a terrible president but a great man.
He did have issues during his term as president, but some of that stuff ended up, longrun, panning out fairly positive, so his reputation is worse than the reality.
He was kinda what a lot of people thought Obama would be- a one term flash in the pan who got some good stuff done. (Then Obama managed to win and throw off that comparison, but at first pretty much everyone thought he'd have one term due to the recession)
I don't think I'd put him in top tier, but not bottom either.