Originally posted by Henry_Pym
You guys realize the VVVAAASSSTTT majority of these people aren't war migrants they are economic migrants. Most polls show only 10% of the migrants are coming from Iraq/Syria.
From what you just said it sounds like a bunch of people not fleeing from war decided to use the people fleeing from war as an excuse to flee to another country. Surely you jest.
That retarded "Refugees welcome" mentality is to blame it is beyond sanity to say that there will be no upper limit for refugees and let everyone and everything in even without papers.
This kind of attittude is as retarded as the right wing's hating on every single refugee, both extremes are dumb but the left extreme is a lot more dangerous for germany.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
We can hope for Germany's sake.Or is this Karma for WW1 and 2?
As for World War 2, I think the allied bombing campaign and the Soviet invasion were probably karma enough.
Originally posted by Omega Vision
World War 1 wasn't Germany's fault, they basically were just saddled with most of the burden for the aftermath because they lost.As for World War 2, I think the allied bombing campaign and the Soviet invasion were probably karma enough.
Honestly do you come up for air when you say things like this?
Forget Kharma your ability to circumnavigate history is crazy.
As for modern times, I am very interested how the situation plays out.
Even if Germany has a stricter policy on migrants now, or about to employ it, I am sceptical on how they can manage such a mass of people.
Namely, what do you do with about a million (or more?) migrants that just came to your country in a spam of few months. That's just unheard of as far as I can tell.
Also, supposedly around 75% percent of those migrants are men between 20 and 40. I asssume Germany will let them call for their wives and kids? If so, how stricter migrant policy applies to that?
Also, what about the people who did not make it and are caught in-between, say Hungary and Germany? Should they be held down in the countries they are now or what? Who is to decide about it?
Hungary has already closed it's borders like a lot of other countries too, we have enough refugees already and should follow.
For ****s sake we don't even know where to put them already, theaters, sports halls and in some cases schools are overflowing already.
Humanism might be fine but at a certain point it becomes self destructive.
Saudi Arabia has an entire tent city for Mekka Pilgrims which is completely emtpy for the rest of teh time and they don't take any refugees.
Originally posted by Parmaniac
Hungary has already closed it's borders like a lot of other countries too, we have enough refugees already and should follow.For ****s sake we don't even know where to put them already, theaters, sports halls and in some cases schools are overflowing already.
Humanism might be fine but at a certain point it becomes self destructive.
Saudi Arabia has an entire tent city for Mekka Pilgrims which is completely emtpy for the rest of teh time and they don't take any refugees.
Saudi Arabia has taken hundreds of thousands refugees from Syria, they are just not counted as such, particularly by the Western Media.
I'm sure they could do more, but that's just a misrepresentation, mostly used to deflect from the issue that there are refugees in Europe that need humanitarian treatment.
The facts remain tha feminism and LGBT movements arose in the West and can actively change the socio -political reality in the western countries, while nothing like that can be said of the Muslim countries. (of that I know off)
I would agree that this cultural divide will take much more and longer to bridge than just a "cultural sensitivity" program tbh.
And on top of that we have terrorists pouring through into Europe among those who are truly immigrants. This was shown by the Paris attacks.
Even if the borders are closed, there's no telling how many terrorists are already in.