Old Master Maul vs Count Dooku Speculation

Started by ILS4 pages

I do like his metal legs. 😱

Take the brain of Old Master Maul, clone it and put it in the body of SoD Maul.

SoD likely wins

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
While I don't think it's remotely likely, I would love to see a brutal Vader vs Maul fight.

If Maul was in peak condition, I see no reason why FPJ would say that Maul would lose to Ahsoka then, tbh.

He thinks she's one of the top-dog fighters, but I wonder if that's more due to his observations on her abilities or if Dave wanks her to those levels. If she does very well against Vader that could probably explain why he thinks that, because he obviously has a very high opinion of him as well.

Yeah, he said he thinks that she is in the top three or four Jedi in combat ability of all time.

So for him to say he thinks Maul loses to her isn't a big deal.

Yeah and He reckons Ahsoka could take Kenobi as well. So FPJ just seems to be a major Ahsoka fanboy tbh.

But then so is Filoni, and he's in charge of Rebels.

inb4 Vader >/= Ben Kenobi > Rebels Ahsoka > Maul/CW Kenobi

Ye of little faith.

All depends od Disney's interpretation of Vader's power, and how well Maul will do against him (with the assumption, that he wont be killed by Kenobi)

Under Disney, Vader is pretty much guaranteed to be > Maul. But yeah nothing to say Old Master Maul can't do well against Vader before being taken out. Well nothing except FPJ.

Yeah. But as I remember, there was a statement, that sadi that Vader after Mustafar is more like Dooku and Maul, just Palpatine's servant or smth like that?
Anyway, if they will show Vader as clearly inferior to Sidious, then Maul's performance against Vader wont be much of a proof for his eventual superiority over Dooku.

^ That was an old statement of Lucas's, which was a pretty vague statement anyway.

Under Disney though Vader and Palpatine are clearly the 2 top Sith in the PT/OT era. And I'd say Vader's not too far below Palpatine tbh. But no other Dark Sider (sans the Ones) will be their equals.

Wasn't Filoni the one, that said something similar at the beggining of creating "Rebels"?
Anyway, the difference between them is more similar then their positions on the actual list.
Palpatine might be top1, Vader top2 and Dooku or Maul top3. But still, Vader might be marginally above Dooku or Maul, and Sidious might be far superior to Vader. In that scenario Maul's performance against Vader wont be that important.
But if Vader is nearly Palpatine's equal, then Mauls performance against him will be a very important thing.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Under Disney, Vader is pretty much guaranteed to be > Maul. But yeah nothing to say Old Master Maul can't do well against Vader before being taken out. Well nothing except FPJ.
Wait and see.

up

Originally posted by quanchi112
Wait and see.

If only quan were here now.

Maul fled, broken in body and spirit, I don't think he will reach the potential he had. Ahsoka should be quite above him and Vader a good deal above both. He certainly won't reach Dookus LS skills nor his mastery of the force (Dooku was a Light side master and mastered the Dark side too.)

Based on last night we see his about equal or slightly superior to Ahsoka but if that reflects his skill now, he definitely isn't on Dooku level.

kek, Ahsoka did better against Vader than Dooku would, so that's some shit logic.

Originally posted by FreshestSlice
kek, Ahsoka did better against Vader than Dooku would, so that's some shit logic.

That's just not true. And Maul is weaker than Ahsoka.

Originally posted by Nephthys
I think Maul will have regressed, personally. He looks old, humbled and weak to me.

^ Oh gosh, look at dat.