#Oscar's so White

Started by Nibedicus11 pages

Found this online. If accurate, doesn't seem like racism against blacks based on stats to me. Based on these stats at least... Latinos/Asians have more of a case to complain.

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Found this online. If accurate, doesn't seem like racism against blacks based on stats to me. Based on these stats at least... Latinos/Asians have more of a case to complain.


So because it's already racist against Latinos it can't also be racist against blacks?

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Found this online. If accurate, doesn't seem like racism against blacks based on stats to me. Based on these stats at least... Latinos/Asians have more of a case to complain.

These stats are from the 2000s forward, and the methodology is not sufficiently explained, however I do think that it is true that in the last decade and a half black people have been better represented (imo partly as a direct result of people pointing out and addressing the previous racism against black people in these award ceremonies), however I think the talk in this thread has been mainly about minorities and people of color (which includes Asians and Latinos who are very much underrepresented).

Here is the full article in The Economist that this graphic is from: http://www.economist.com/blogs/prospero/2016/01/film-and-race

Originally posted by Slay
So because it's already racist against Latinos it can't also be racist against blacks?

We don't know if it's "already racist against latinos/asians". Just that the stats shown don't seem to support the claim of "racism against blacks".

Originally posted by Bardock42
These stats are from the 2000s forward, and the methodology is not sufficiently explained, however I do think that it is true that in the last decade and a half black people have been better represented (imo partly as a direct result of people pointing out and addressing the previous racism against black people in these award ceremonies), however I think the talk in this thread has been mainly about minorities and people of color (which includes Asians and Latinos who are very much underrepresented).

Here is the full article in The Economist that this graphic is from: http://www.economist.com/blogs/prospero/2016/01/film-and-race

Like I said, asians and latinos make a better case about awards exclusion (Tho, as an Asian, I don't really care and only want the deserving ones to win). Black ppl? Not so much.

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Like I said, asians and latinos make a better case about awards exclusion (Tho, as an Asian, I don't really care and only want the deserving ones to win). Black ppl? Not so much.

Yeah, I think everyone wants those that are most deserving to win. Some people just view racial biases as opposed to that goal and giving white people an undue advantage.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Yeah, I think everyone wants those that are most deserving to win. Some people just view racial biases as opposed to that goal and giving white people an undue advantage.

Proof of racial bias in the awards, tho?

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Proof of racial bias in the awards, tho?

Well, there's only the circumstantial and statistical evidence, as no one has come out to admitted to being racially biased afaik, except perhaps the Academy's commitment to solve the issue being a tacit admission.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Well, there's only the circumstantial and statistical evidence, as no one has come out to admitted to being racially biased afaik, except perhaps the Academy's commitment to solve the issue being a tacit admission.

I find the Academy's "commitment" to "solve" the "issue" (notice my use of " "?) more like simple pandering to avoid being negatively labeled, IMO.

Originally posted by Nibedicus
I find the Academy's "commitment" to "solve" the "issue" (notice my use of " "?) more like simple pandering to avoid being negatively labeled, IMO.

Yeah, I suppose those are the two main readings of their decision.