Teen Girl Defends herself against Sexual Assault; will now face legal reprocussions

Started by Robtard5 pages

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Explain then why liberals are always taking away our right and taxing us more and plunging us into debt, how does that sound like liberty.

Conservatism means to conserve what we have.

-What rights have you lost exactly under Obama? I hear this a lot from Conservatives and tea-people. Last time I checked the biggest infringement on our rights was the Patriot Act; that wasn't Obama, did I forget something?

-Taxes haven't really risen for the vast majority of Americans, those making over $200k or households making over $250k have risen a little bit and those making over $400k/$450k(home) are taxed slightly over the previous administrations numbers

-The debt has risen severely under Obama, but that's what you get going into a recession and being handed an extremely costly [then] 5+ year war

You really need to get off the "liberalism is evil" merry-go-round, brah

How about he wants to penalize me for not qualifying for Obamacare.

But I know you don't give two shits about that.

That's a loss of a right? No, it's a glitch in the system which you can probably fix by eFiling some paperwork

Oh so I have to file paperwork and waste my time and money to fix Obamacares**** ups.

The fact that any combat veteran is not automatically approved is beyond me.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
How about he wants to penalize me for not qualifying for Obamacare.

But I know you don't give two shits about that.


I thought this was an issue of your state refusing extra federal money.

Originally posted by Robtard
-What rights have you lost exactly under Obama? I hear this a lot from Conservatives and tea-people. Last time I checked the biggest infringement on our rights was the Patriot Act, that wasn't Obama; did I forget something?

Yeah good thing Obama expanded on the patriot act and even used a drone strike on an american citizen before due process and droned his 17 year son as well.

Realistically though "rights" lost would more then likely appear under some sort of govt agency if an executive order or memorandum changed how that agency might interact with said citizen, which is something all presidents have done and isn't unique to Obama.

IOW: "None" 👆

Now let us cry some more about Obama taking away our guns so Smith & Wesson can beat previous quarterly profits

Originally posted by -Pr-
Europe isn't one country...

Originally posted by Robtard
IOW: "None" 👆

Now let us cry some more about Obama taking away our guns so Smith & Wesson can beat previous quarterly profits

You can thank Obama for Smith and Wesson record quarterly profits.

#pwnd

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
You can thank Obama for Smith and Wesson record quarterly profits.

#pwnd

While S&W should send Obama a nice basket or edible arrangement every single day, it's really not Obama.

It's the degenerates who spin Obama saying "we need gun reform" into "Obama wants to take away your guns!" and all the troglodytes that believe the lies and rush out to buy even more guns and ammo.

Where is your proof of these "degenerates" having more influence then Obama on the American people's choice to buy guns based on his statements on guns?

Because people don't rush out to buy more guns/ammo when they're not actually being taken away, they rush out when they believe their rights to buy them will be 👆

To date, has Obama taken your guns away? No, he has not.

Ok so no proof on anyone else manipulating people to buy guns, other then Obama.

Let me tell you about a little natural phenomenon called "cause and effect."

👆

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Ok so no proof on anyone else manipulating people to buy guns, other then Obama.

Let me tell you about a little natural phenomenon call "cause and effect."

👆

👆

Owned him.

Originally posted by Robtard
That's a loss of a right? No, it's a glitch in the system which you can probably fix by eFiling some paperwork

When people see their tax refunds for this year they will probably think so.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Where is your proof of these "degenerates" having more influence then Obama on the American people's choice to buy guns based on his statements on guns?

One of your recent school shootings last year.

The kid got access to guns his mother was illegally stock piling at home "in case of Obama."

And let's no argue on whether she was technically a degenerate or not.

Can't we all just live in peace, be friends and agree that Obama is a failure, liberalism sucks and people need to have guns to protect themselves 🙂

EDIT: Also, hats off to that girl. 👆

If I masterly defended myself from aggression by clubbing a guy with an assault rifle I'd still expect to be prosecuted by owning a frigging rifle and carrying it around.

I understand people making a difference between an assault rifle and pepper spray, but so does the law.

May this case be decided swiftly in favor of the girl with the pepperspray.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Ok so no proof on anyone else manipulating people to buy guns, other then Obama.

Let me tell you about a little natural phenomenon called "cause and effect."

👆

Yea, the cause of 'spending several years not talking about it,' making people panic in their britches and run around saying he will.

Obama's actions often have very little to do with what people panic about his actions being.


Explain then why liberals are always taking away our right and taxing us more and plunging us into debt, how does that sound like liberty.

Rights have increased during Obama's term. The tax rate is still much closer to the historical low-end of the last century than not. Debt goes up after a financial crash regardless- The Republicans were pushing for austerity, famous for raising debt while harming the economy at the same time, something that happened in multiple other countries at the time our economy was improving and unemployment cutting in half.

Why do you support a policy that raises debt more, but without lowering unemployment and the like? Heck, 'debt' is not a particularly important economic sign, not compared to GDP- risen constantly under President Obama- or unemployment- Cut in half under Obama. 'Debt' is what people go to when they don't have good economic arguments or don't get how national debts actually work.

Want to know how you lower debt? You increase revenue, i.e. raise taxes for real, on the upper class and other sectors that can afford it and which are currently under-taxed compared to historical levels. Something Obama hasn't done much of, because, well, again, what Obama's actions really are have little impact on what people panic over his actions being.

If you want to complain about someone, it pays to learn how it actually works, rather than yelling something as the worst thing ever without realizing that, "Oh, the debt went up because it was paying for fixing our giant employment hole, and then when employment is up that increases economic health which is long-term better for the economy than trying to pay off debt in a recession and stalling a recovery."

Originally posted by dadudemon
Mmmmkay.

Here is my opinion: the people prosecuting this should be pepper-sprayed in the face and then smacked in the face for being so stupid. This includes any magistrate/judge involved, as well.

Opposing opinion: "But pepper-spray is illegal and she assaulted someone in an illegal manner."

My counter-argument: "Then change the stupid ****ing law! She's not in the wrong, the law is in the wrong. If she can't have a gun, can't use a knife (I assume they can't use a knife to protect themselves), then her options are a less lethal taser or a the non-lethal pepper-spray."

Okay, thoughts? Am I wrong? Am I right? What do you think about this situation?

http://www.thelocal.dk/20160126/danish-teen-fought-off-her-attacker-with-pepper-spray-now-shell-face-fine

I agree with you, I think European countries are too strict when it comes to things like pepper spray (I believe in Germany there is a "loop hole" to carrying it at least if they are designated for protection against animals). Also knives actually, in Germany it is forbidden to carry a blade with lock mechanism...smh