Who can create more jobs

Started by Time-Immemorial3 pages
Originally posted by Bardock42
Well, the economy does better under democratic presidents, so either Clinton or Sanders. Clinton would probably continue the very successful course of Obama, which has decreased unemployment significantly. On the other hand Sanders social policies could lead to more jobs and free up third jobs that people have to take up to make ends meet. So I'm not sure, either would be good.

Not really, Reagan>all

Bernie is not a democrat, he's a socialist.

There is no way he can create more jobs then Trump.

Originally posted by FinalAnswer
Socialism =/= Communism thx very much

They're both versions of the same disease. GG 👆

Originally posted by Stigma
They're both versions of the same disease. GG 👆

Just like how conservatism and fascism is the same right?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Not really, Reagan>all

Bernie is not a democrat, he's a socialist.

There is no way he can create more jobs then Trump.


Actually:

B. Clinton > Reagan in jobs

Carter also beat Reagan if we compare his single term to Reagan's two terms individually.

There's several others that also beat Reagan if we keep going down the line over the last hundred years or so; several of them Democratic presidents

Originally posted by FinalAnswer
Just like how conservatism and fascism is the same right?

LOL no.

Also, nice bait 👆

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Not really, Reagan>all

Eh, he's no Obama or Clinton.

Clinton outdid everyone in economy in our lifetimes.

Obama managed a similar reduction in unemployment in much harder circumstances.

But again, we're near peak employment. No-one's gonna make oodles of jobs because in order to do so you'd have to import oodles of people. We don't have enough Americans to have giant job growth from where we are, thanks to Obama.

Reagan>Obama

In your dreams Obama has outdone Reagan.

Originally posted by Stigma
LOL no.

Also, nice bait 👆

Well your comparison is just as asinine so there you go.

Originally posted by Q99
Eh, he's no Obama or Clinton.

Clinton outdid everyone in economy in our lifetimes.

.

Clinton didn't create the tech boom but he was lucky enough that he got to ride it through his presidency. Just like when people love to talk about his budgets which were congressional budgets (in his case republican congressional.)

If Trump sticks to his guns on making deals I'd wager that perhaps he could help to create an economic enviroment to boost private sector jobs.

Bernie could be good as well though if he is able to focus on small business and spank some of the babied large corporations.

Conservacons love to try and rob the states-master Bill Clinton of his glory, but they can't. No. They. Can't.

Originally posted by Robtard
Conservacons love to try and rob the states-master Bill Clinton of his glory, but they can't. No. They. Can't.

😆 He was a very successful president but he didn't create the tech boom and that was what drove "his" economic accomplishments in the private sector.

Then again people like to look exclusively at the president and tend to forget the congress and the courts and what current events/market factors are driving regardless of DC.

Originally posted by FinalAnswer
Well your comparison is just as asinine so there you go.

No, not really.

Socialism and Communism have something important in common (pun intended). I let you figure out what it is.

Originally posted by snowdragon
😆 He was a very successful president but he didn't create the tech boom and that was what drove "his" economic accomplishments in the private sector.

Then again people like to look exclusively at the president and tend to forget the congress and the courts and what current events/market factors are driving regardless of DC.


Absolutely. No president can create jobs single-handedly, but the ones that have better understanding of business and economy will have a much bigger chance to succeed in this during their term. That's why Trump should be good at it.

Originally posted by Stigma
No, not really.

Socialism and Communism have something important in common (pun intended). I let you figure out what it is.

Just like Donald Trump and Adolf Hitler have important traits in common right?

Originally posted by FinalAnswer
Just like Donald Trump and Adolf Hitler have important traits in common right?

LOL Talk about asinine comparison.

Your conditioning is working well, liberal stormtrooper 👆

But seriously I think we can safely say that our viewpoints are too different to reconcile, so there's no point in going back and forth about it. Just read the wise words of Winston Churchill in my signature and peace with you, bro.

And Winston Churchill was a ****ing scum bag responsible for Gallipoli and the current situation in the Middle East.

Originally posted by snowdragon

If Trump sticks to his guns on making deals I'd wager that perhaps he could help to create an economic enviroment to boost private sector jobs.

If he sticks to his guns on immigration, he'll cause a regional economic implosion, though.

What do people think happens when you remove 10 million people? Quick answer, you have massive amounts of companies shut down, demand drops, etc.. The Southwest becomes an economic pit for decades.

His deal-making ability could be helpful, but that's just one aspect of his platform, and his actual tax proposal mentioned isn't one that'd help either.

And as a businessman, he's ok, but If he had taken his inherited money and invested it in a mutual fund that tracked the S&P 500, he'd be at about the same wealth level to slightly richer. If he put it in a more diverse high-performing portfolio (but still not getting involved in actual managing the investments more specifically), he'd be a few times richer.

Warren Buffet, interestingly, did start with about the same amount of money at about the same time, and via choosing and managing his investments, he's over an order of magnitude richer.

And of course, managing investments and managing an economy is, itself, pretty different, experience in one doesn't mean one will be great at the other.


Bernie could be good as well though if he is able to focus on small business and spank some of the babied large corporations.

His minimum wage would be pretty interesting. I don't think we'd necessarily see much job *growth* but we would likely see the same jobs providing higher quality of life, which is at least as important if not more-so.

Originally posted by FinalAnswer

And Winston Churchill was a ****ing scum bag responsible for Gallipoli and the current situation in the Middle East.

It forgot the one where Trump purposed that Muslims in America where Muslim Identifier tags, so everyone will known when there are Muslims about. Similar in how Jews were made to where the Star-of-David and homosexuals a Pink Triangle in Nazi Germany.

Originally posted by FinalAnswer

And Winston Churchill was a ****ing scum bag responsible for Gallipoli and the current situation in the Middle East.

Isn't there a saying that the person that uses the Hitler argument to start any conversation always loses?

Pretty sure you are just posting off topic and that has nothing to do with jobs.

You just seem a bit hurt cause Trump has the most votes in the polls for job creation.

Never even voted in the poll lol

You seem a bit hurt the comparison is valid.