ChaosTheory123
Bored with sanity
That's better buddy :maybe
Originally posted by carthage
None of which calls into question the fact Exar's best showings are when he's on Yavin, if you want to delude yourself into thinking he's capable of similar feats on neutral ground by using units of measurement applicable to real life than have at it.
In summation
You want to keep randomly assuming shit about given feats as opposed to actually using a legit measurable metric to establish comparisons?
Who exactly is the deluded one buddy? :hmm
This hobby fails on many levels, but I can at least be assured I'm at least trying to use some objective metric to gauge feats here.
Its awe inspiring that on Yavin he can utterly blow apart Massassi, but fail to do the same on someone he's supposedly more powerful than.
Are you that simple minded to assume just because he's superior she can't hold some fraction of his power?
And why do you selectively use conservation of energy when convenient?
Either go full tilt with it or say **** it
Anything in between is wishy washy garbage *shrugs*
I'm not seeing how her durability factors into it, the blasts clearly aren't of the same potency for the aforementioned reason of Exar being on a nexus.
So
We're going the "Thon is a ****ing monster" route :hmm
Because its the general assumption that a powerful force user can dominate a lesser powerful force user?
Why?
They're human sized masses and the energies needed to move them are pithy
Its even worse when you toss non force sensitives into the mix who should be ****ing powder under the logic you guys work with
Its better to use beam o war shit, because you can at least be sure they're putting their all into the attack in bloodlust sans different context
But that's beside the point seeing as Odan Urr didn't "Ragdoll" him, all he did was blast him back.
Semantics are just boring
Not that it would be any more reliable than any of your usual metrics of "kilojoules", powerscaling, or any of the other tools you regularly employ on your discussions on this forum
So me comparing shit to real world values isn't legit where as your eyeballing biased assumptions that subconsciously draw on the same shit anyway are?
That's cute~
No, go ahead
Explain why a given feat is impressive without referencing some form of physics
In a discussion where AP implies Exar is next to Luke, I'd say it warrants a discussion, lol
Don't see the gap being much more than maybe 2 times weaker than that given incarnation of Luke being generous with how much power Durron contributed myself
So, instead of ignoring the question
Discuss
Don't run away
At least not until I grow bored of playing devils advocate with you~
I don't know where to begin seeing as I don't value powerscaling as an argument, unless the users being compared have showings to base a comparison on i,e Exar being more powerful than Nadd, Sadow, Muur- so it would be difficult to entertain any discussion on those merits.
This is traditionally called "moving the goal posts"
So, other than opinion based shit, anything else?
The examples I listed all take place on the same planet Exar was on, and are all evidence of the powerful force presence there along with all sorts of quotes from different eras that have been posted Ad nauseam on this forum regarding how powerful Yavin is in relation to the feats of force users.
You're doing that "saying nothing with too much" thing again
Yes, nexus are powerful, but why are you assuming they're some kind of massive amp where performances by light siders on powerful Nexus shit on that interpretation hard? :hmm
A few inconsistent examples like your Bastila example, really don't detract from the main point that Exar Kun offworld really has nothing to put him on Luke's tier or even Vader's for that matter so I see it as moot.
"I don't like it, it didn't happen"
Really?