Originally posted by Ushgarak
Angel never chose evil; he was possessed by a force which then made him do evil things. Anakin actively chose to embrace dark forces.
Angel does remember the pleasure he felt by inflicting pains to others, and if he truly considered himself acquited from his actions he wouldn't be pursuing redemption. Any quest for salvation assumes there is a big fault, the biggest the fault the deepest the need for expunging one's sin.
Vader's demise was "easy" in comparison.
Originally posted by Ushgarak
You can't 'make up' for crimes of that scale. It would be exceptionally wrong for him [b]not to face justice. The only morally acceptable outcome would be appropriate punishment, which if redeemed he would submit himself to.[/B]
The saga disagrees since he was redeemed and came back as a force ghost. There wasn't any "appropiate" punishment and death was just a short punishment compared with the continued task of "making amends".
Punishment isn't always justice. If offing Anakin will end up in the galaxy being torn into war, then Anakin is responsible for the potential danger he inflicts to civilization by "giving himself" in. In that case, facing "justice" is blalantly ignoring his responsabilities and is immoral.
Originally posted by Ushgarak
Dramatically, dying is much better. That's why redemption = death; the character's story arc is dead anyway at that point.
The outcome it's ok, I'm not dissing the saga for what happened, I'm pointing out that there were other possibilities that make for engaging storytelling. It's not as if ancient mythology didn't have many stories about Fallen heros that went on living after commiting atrocities.