Black Lives Matter thread

Originally posted by dadudemon
Oh, NOW you're concerned about the accuracy of words used to describe people's positions?

grouchoawe

Given the low thresholds at which he calls you guys "nazis" or which he labels self defence "domestic terrorism" I think it's easily safe to call Adam a pedophile based on the wording he used to describe his fantasy regarding the rape of a minor.

@Adam

It is not irrelevant.

Trust me pedo, it's irrelevant.

The straight men of this board were either speaking about the events of the shooting, the nuance of legality or what morally constitutes self defence.

The only person who gleefully pondered about what might happen to Kyle's "sweet ass" during the prison time he won't serve was you - the resident gay - Who was more upset with a kid shooting in self defence than the convicted pedo trying to attack him.

I described the state of his ass as virginal

Oh yah, "I only wanted to remark on the virginal state of a young boys ass where such a remark wasn't provoked"

In fact pedo, I'd say you've implicated yourself further wth said comment. No one seems to care about what would happen to the "virginal state" of a minors ass but you. Obviously it's interesting to ask why virgin buts seems to captivate your attention if little boys aren't your tipple.

Nope. I did not even imply rape

Yep.

Yes you did. It's really as simple as that, pedo.

In popular culture most of the sex that happens in prison is depicted with violence, coercing or threats, and most of the research has been regarding non consensual acts. As there simply isn't enough data to say which percentage of of hetro prisoners engage in homosexual acts that aren't forced, we can take your comment in the same grain as "don't drop the soap" memetics.

Of course, the specific wording and themes of your post confirm the implication.

. I wonder how all of the black men, who will make up the majority of his fellow inmates, will feel about him murdering people protesting a police officer murdering an unarmed black man in front of his three minor children while responding to a call that was not about him? Surely, they will see him as an upstanding citizen who was just defending himself like all of the gaslighting racists here believe. On second thought, Rittenhouse did not really think this out. I hope his cherry ass enjoys prison![/b]

You sarcastically detail the ways in which black inmates will probably not like Kyle right before sarcastically commenting on how much Kyles "cherry ass" - which you explain to mean "virgin ass" enjoys prison.

Now, I doubt you meant that these angry gorillas would provide Kyle with consensual intimacy if he felt lonely or horny, so the only logical conclusion is that you meant something far nastier and forced. You were gleefully advocated for rape, yeah.

Rape of a minor no less.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Sorry, I am not interested in men with small penises.

Yeah, we've already established you like little boys with "cherry asses"

Yeah, a minor can't go to prison. If trialed and convicted as an adult, he'd wait out his minor status in a facility for minors and then only go to an adult prison sometime after he became a legal adult.

Referring to Black people as "angry gorillas", is that more or your "sensible" racism.

If we're speaking about Adam's hypothetical black convicts who'd rape another inmate, then yeah.

Originally posted by Robtard
While Rittenhouse needs to go down for murdering people, Sheskey shouldn't get a free pass. Both teen and cop should have a trial and if found guilty, sentenced to the full extent of the law.

What was the first person Kyle shot doing when he got shot?

Originally posted by Surtur
What was the first person Kyle shot doing when he got shot?

Oh I can answer this one.......chasing him down and trying to grab his rifle, so easy.

IOW: Trying to neutralize/disarm a threat, an underage teen with a gun

Rob do you disagree with that assessment?

Originally posted by Robtard
IOW: Trying to neutralize a threat, an underage teen with a gun

Lol. Who was he threatening? And one of the guys Kyle shot had a gun, was he a threat?

Kyle is a clear hero. The villains were the communist thugs who chased after him and tried to do bodily harm to him.

Cuz Kyle wasn't threatening to shoot anyone prior to that. And if it's wrong for Kyle to take the law into his own hands and go defend places and people then the correct action for these folk would have been to call the cops, not chase down the frightened teen with a rifle. There is zero evidence he was actively threatening people and nope the mere act of carrying a gun doesn't show that.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol. Who was he threatening? And one of the guys Kyle shot had a gun, was he a threat?

Lol cuz Kyle shot him in the arm before he could.

Kyle had a gun but did not use it until attacked.

That's you imaging and playing out the scenario, you have no idea if Rittenhouse's third victim was going to fire his gun or not.

The jury will decide.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Kyle is a clear hero. The villains were the communist thugs who chased after him and tried to do bodily harm to him.

Rob is trolling, it's all he has left. He clearly just implied the third person shot wasn't a threat because he didn't use his gun. Kyle didn't use his until he was threatened by others.

He will pretend this was murder tho, it's funny. Just watch him prove me correct with his future posts.

Originally posted by Robtard
That's you imaging and playing out the scenario, you have no idea if Rittenhouse's third victim was going to fire his gun or not.

The jury will decide.

Lol see ethneo? Called it.

Originally posted by Surtur
Rob is trolling, it's all he has left. He clearly just implied the third person shot wasn't a threat because he didn't use his gun. Kyle didn't use his until he was threatened by others.

He will pretend this was murder tho, it's funny. Just watch him prove me correct with his future posts.

Another strawman argument. Try and attack what I am saying, not what you're making up and applying to me.

Rittenhouse did murder two people and wounded a third. The jury will decide his fate.

You've yet to show Kyle was a threat prior to being attacked. If merely carrying a gun makes him a threat the guy he shot was a threat too, not just to Kyle but to everyone else there.

But then again you know this. Pretend you don't though, I will allow it 🙂

An armed underage teen going out to be a vigilante is a threat. He took it upon himself to be judge jury and executioner.

so an armed adult going to riot isn't a threat, got it

we move on now 👆