Black Lives Matter thread

Started by Robtard159 pages

Originally posted by Surtur
so an armed adult going to riot isn't a threat, got it

we move on now 👆

More strawman arguments, good boy.

AFAIK, Rittenhouse's third victim, the one with the gun, had not shot or shot at anyone. He should be arrested and invested though. Do forensics on his gun, see if any found bullets belong to his weapon.

NY teacher shares cartoon with students comparing police officers to KKK. It was part of a Black Lives Matter-themed assignment.

Lol progressivism is a cult.

Originally posted by Robtard
IOW: Trying to neutralize/disarm a threat, an underage teen with a gun

Doesn't hold up in court nor in spirit.

The video footage shows these events in order :

- Kyle attempting to put out dumpster fire situated next to gas pipes.

- Pedo Convict starts chasing him with mob behind him

- Kyle retreats for quite a while

- Someone in the mob fires a shot, you can hear an audible shot and see the mussel flash

- Kyle shoots the guy chasing him

Given that Kyle didn't fire the first shot, was outnumbered and the attacker had no idea Kyle was underage, this doesn't hold up. The fact that Kyle was retreating from the crowd until there was a gun shot makes it a clear cut case of self defence.

Oh I guess rob is trolling.

Or does he just use that excuse when his points are shot down, which happens on a regular...

Originally posted by JohnnyRotton
Doesn't hold up in court nor in spirit.

The video footage shows these events in order :

- Kyle attempting to put out dumpster fire situated next to gas pipes.

- Pedo Convict starts chasing him with mob behind him

- Kyle retreats for quite a while

- Someone in the mob fires a shot, you can hear an audible shot and see the mussel flash

- Kyle shoots the guy chasing him

Given that Kyle didn't fire the first shot, was outnumbered and the attacker had no idea Kyle was underage, this doesn't hold up. The fact that Kyle was retreating from the crowd until there was a gun shot makes it a clear cut case of self defence.

Just move on, you can't win this argument because Rob is arguing from a position of bad faith. When he does this it is best just to change the subject.

He knows Kyle didn't fire his gun until accosted, yet says the 3rd person shot was not a threat because he had not shot at anyone. This is what Rob does. What bothers them more is moving on from it, they want you to continually engage with this convo.

Originally posted by JohnnyRotton
Doesn't hold up in court nor in spirit.

Considering Rittenhouse hasn't had a single day in court, kinda weird to say that. We'll see though when he goes to court.

Originally posted by Surtur
Rob is trolling, it's all he has left. He clearly just implied the third person shot wasn't a threat because he didn't use his gun. Kyle didn't use his until he was threatened by others.

He will pretend this was murder tho, it's funny. Just watch him prove me correct with his future posts.

Oh, I know he is. It reminds me of how he sided with the corrupt prosecutor who charged that couple for simple defending their own property and lives from BLM thugs by simply exercising ther 2nd amendment rights.

Or how pooty trolls when he acts outraged that people in cars drive thru so-called "protestors" who're blocking the road and banging on their car doors and shit lol.

Destroying their points = Trolling. Trumpers are silly.

Why did you get banned rob, was it trolling?

Oh I told a mod to do it and was obeyed.

🙂

Originally posted by JohnnyRotton
Why did you get banned rob, was it trolling?

Surt whinged and begged for 9 pages to have me and Whirly banned and Backfire felt genuinely bad for him.

Originally posted by Robtard
Destroying their points = Trolling. Trumpers are silly.

Nah, you're not destroying anything, Robbie.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Nah, you're not destroying anything, Robbie.

He even lies and says I pushed for 9 pages to have him banned. Adorable.

Originally posted by Robtard
Surt whinged and begged for 9 pages to have me and Whirly banned and Backfire felt genuinely bad for him.

because of the trolling?

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Nah, you're not destroying anything, Robbie.

Rittenhouse's first victim did not fire a gun as that man did not have a gun to begin with. See how easy it is to destroy you people's points.

Originally posted by JohnnyRotton
because of the trolling?

No.

Oh yes

Originally posted by Surtur
He even lies and says I pushed for 9 pages to have him banned. Adorable.

Was it more than 9 pages you whinged about it? Cos the thread is still there.

You then whinged to have me banned for an extra two weeks the day after I was banned. Lolz. RDS to the extreme.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Oh, I know he is. It reminds me of how he sided with the corrupt prosecutor who charged that couple for simple defending their own property and lives from BLM thugs by simply exercising ther 2nd amendment rights.

Or how pooty trolls when he acts outraged that people in cars drive thru so-called "protestors" who're blocking the road and banging on their car doors and shit lol.

Oh speaking of that:

9 Protesters Confronted By Gun-Waving St. Louis Couple Get Trespassing Citations

One of them whined on twitter "waaah they pointed a gun but they coming after me?!!" lol.

Even if the couple committed a crime(they didn't) how come these inferiors can't see multiple crimes can occur at once?

Originally posted by Robtard
Rittenhouse's first victim did not fire a gun as that man did not have a gun to begin with. See how easy it is to destroy you people's points.

I was speaking to someone about this earlier and they told me if your outnumbered, being chased and under valid threat of being killed or injured you can shoot the person(s) mobbing you according to Wisconsin law. It doesn't matter if the pedo had a gun or not, someone else in the crowd assailing him shot first. Which is valid especially if you think the pedo was trying to disarm kyle, which is what you said anyway.