Black Lives Matter thread

Started by Firefly218159 pages
Originally posted by Silent Master
Your interpretation of the data is what I am calling your opinion, if you want me to believe your interpretation provide the peer-reviewed studies that back it up
Originally posted by Firefly218
***** it's not my opinion. It's data from a .gov study. In 2008 the correlation is .25 between contemporary spending and educational attainment. Conversely the correlation is .40 between spending from 20 years ago and educational attainments. Which correlation is stronger? I'll leave it to you now

I've given you the data. Now I'm asking for your interpretation. What is the statistical trend that you see? In 2008, which piece of data is stronger and which is weaker? I'll give you a clue, your or my opinions/interpretations don't fuking matter, 2 + 2 still equals 4.

Again, if you want me to believe your interpretation of the data provide an actual peer-reviewed study that proves it.

Originally posted by Robtard
There's a saying: "You can lead a cuck to water but you can't make him drink."
Showing facts to ppl who don't want to believe them is kind of futile at this point

Again, i'm not questioning the data itself, I am questioning your interpretation of the data. If you want me to believe your interpretation is correct provide a peer-reviewed study that proves it

Originally posted by Silent Master
Again, if you want me to believe your interpretation of the data provide an actual peer-reviewed study that proves it.
I'm not sure if you're willfully being ignorant or truly don't understand how these data work. Numbers don't need people's opinions to be accurate... I don't need a peer evaluation to know that .40 > .25 from 2008

At this point I don't even think you realize what is being argued.

Have you figured out the point I was making, or do you need me to explain it to you?

Originally posted by Silent Master
At this point I don't even think you realize what is being argued.
You claimed that education statistics were better under Bush than they were under Obama, and said it was because Bush' Republican policies were better than Obama's Democratic policies.

I acknowledged that perhaps education statistics were better under Bush than they were under Obama, but it's not because Bush' policies are superior.

I then justified my claim that Bush' policies were not superior by providing evidence that a President's policies don't have an immediate effect. It takes time for education statistics to reflect the policies of a President, and therefore the stats under Bush are not a fair representation of his policies.

You realize that 12 of the 20 years before Bush took office we had a Republican president right?

Originally posted by Silent Master
You realize that 12 of the 20 years before Bush took office we had a Republican president right?
I mean the point is that you can't simple-mindedly attribute education stats to the current President. You can't blame Obama for the trainwreck he inherited and you can't credit Trump now that education has been starting to improve.

And I have nothing against George HW Bush, he was a pretty decent President. Reagan is the guy who started us on this trickle-down economics path of destruction imo though.

The only thing I have ever credited Trump with, is being a moron and an idiot.

Originally posted by Silent Master
The only thing I have ever credited Trump with, is being a moron and an idiot.
Okay so you agree with me then 👆

Legit depiction of how it went down between beaner George Zimmerman and the dinus Trayvon Martin. 😉

YouTube video

YouTube video

So recently here we had yet *another* instance of people being gunned down and murdered at a memorial for someone else who was gunned down and murdered.

Mass Shooting Targets Mourners At Memorial, Killing 2 And Wounding 8

Sad thing is I originally saw this article on a site that had nothing to do with news just specific to Chicago. But when I saw the headline I knew it was probably Chicago and yep, it was.

Originally posted by riv6672
YouTube video

Fixed that for you champ.

Originally posted by vansonbee
Legit depiction of how it went down between beaner George Zimmerman and the dinus Trayvon Martin. 😉

[img]https://i.imgur.com/D46z1tx.jpg[/img

Reported for posting images from StormFront

ps you're Asian, even though you have a shared hatred of black people with those Nazis, they'll still look down on you too, smartguy

sauce: http://myfox8.com/2017/05/15/woman-allegedly-ripped-up-mothers-day-card-beat-6-year-old-son/

SPARTANBURG, S.C. — A South Carolina woman is accused of beating her 6-year-old son after he gave a Mother’s Day card to his grandmother but not to her, WHNS reports.

Police went to a residence in Spartanburg around 6:40 p.m. on Thursday in reference to a disturbance. Once they arrived, officers found a grandmother standing with her two grandchildren.

The woman told police that 30-year-old Shontrell Murphy hit the boy on the front, side, and back of his head because he gave his grandmother a card but not her. She then tore the card up.

Murphy later admitted to hitting her son, but “does not believe it was in a hard or violent manner.” The children told police Murphy hits them consistently and are afraid of their mother.

Murphy is facing a child cruelty charge.