Darth Vader vs. Darth Maul [SABERS ONLY]

Started by |King Joker|4 pages

Darth Vader vs. Darth Maul [SABERS ONLY]

This fight is a sabers only match. Canon feats and accolades only.

Vader as of Star Wars Rebels.
Maul as of Son of Dathomir.

I'd side Vader. Given his speed feats and increased mastery of the Force, as well as more time to perfect his technical skill, he should be on a level sufficient enough for him to beat Dawth Mawl.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
I'd side Vader. Given his speed feats and increased mastery of the Force, as well as more time to perfect his technical skill, he should be on a level sufficient enough for him to beat Dawth Mawl.

Rebels Vader loses, RotJ on the other hand would win.

Originally posted by cs_zoltan
Rebels Vader loses, RotJ on the other hand would win.
Hidalgo says Rebels is Vader's prime.

Vader 8/10

Maul.

Originally posted by Syndicate
Maul.
Reasons?

Originally posted by |King Joker|
Reasons?

Comparative in all physical aspects and superior in agility due to Vader's hindered mobility. Should balance out. Skill I'd mark about the same or maybe even favoring Vader if this was his RotJ incarnation and included Legends. As it is Vader doesn't have the skill showings to put him above or debatably even on par with Maul. Vader obviously would take the force edge but since that's not accounted for in this battle.

Originally posted by |King Joker|
Hidalgo says Rebels is Vader's prime.

Don't really care what he says.

Seeing as how he's one of the heads of the story group and pretty much one of the arbiters of canon you should. But whatever. 😉

I've got to be honest KJ. I'm not much for unsubstantiated statements either.

Yeah this guy has made several statements before that make absolutely zero sense.

So you'd rather take a statement from a novel written decades ago and apply it to today's canon, rather than a current statement from one of the heads of the story group/canon? That makes no sense.

Originally posted by |King Joker|
So you'd rather take a statement from a novel written decades ago and apply it to today's canon, rather than a current statement from one of the heads of the story group/canon? That makes no sense.

Why do we have to use unsubstantiated statements at all?

Originally posted by Syndicate
Why do we have to use unsubstantiated statements at all?

Lmfao.

Originally posted by Syndicate
Why do we have to use unsubstantiated statements at all?
Since when does a declaration by one of the head story group guys get ignored simply because people don't like it? He's an authority figure on canon, what he says is worth something.

U are doing well joker

Originally posted by Syndicate
Why do we have to use unsubstantiated statements at all?

That's really only a question you can answer for yourself, tbh.

Originally posted by |King Joker|
what he says is worth something.

And the canon novel authorized by GL isn't?