Originally posted by SquallXWell, I am a "god". But, I am a "just" god.
It's a shame you limited to just DC and Marvel. There's some Indie comics have some pretty sick creatures.
So, the ban on non-Marvel and DC comic book monsters is hereby ABOLISHED!!
Let monsters of all different universes find fun, friendship and acceptance in this thread!!
(That is, of course, as long as they meet all other remaining criteria.) Because, well, the other monsters are just... Well, "different".
And, as we all know, things that are "different", should always face strict intolerance.
So, let it be done.
Originally posted by Galan007
I'd have to disagree with Bill being a 'monster'. mmm
Originally posted by One Big Mob
He's probably just talking about his horsecock and equating his monster dick to be relevant here.
I see that some questions seem to be popping up concerning the criteria that would be involved for a character to be considered a "monster". And, to be honest, after creating this thread I immediately had the same questions.
So, let's throw some ideas around.
What details would have to be present for a character to be officially listed as a "Monster"?
I was thinking...
1. Unique- if the creature is simply a member of a "monstrous" race / species, it would not be a monster. Unless the creature is mutated, altered, etc, in such a way that sets it apart, even from it's own monstrous race / species.
2. Appearance- a character that has all "human" features, even if somewhat strange or frightening, should not be considered a "monster", imho. There must be features present, that set it apart from the "human" form.
I will stop there and see if anybody else has an opinion on this.
Originally posted by Horrificus
I see that some questions seem to be popping up concerning the criteria that would be involved for a character to be considered a "monster". And, to be honest, after creating this thread I immediately had the same questions.So, let's throw some ideas around.
What details would have to be present for a character to be officially listed as a "Monster"?
I was thinking...1. Unique- if the creature is simply a member of a "monstrous" race / species, it would not be a monster. Unless the creature is mutated, altered, etc, in such a way that sets it apart, even from it's own monstrous race / species.
2. Appearance- a character that has all "human" features, even if somewhat strange or frightening, should not be considered a "monster", imho. There must be features present, that set it apart from the "human" form.
I will stop there and see if anybody else has an opinion on this.